En 22/01/13 09:52, Maciej Stachowiak escribiu:
>> That'd be awesome, at least an overview document that could help people
>> to understand the whole picture and the main advantages/drawbacks of the
>> selected design.
>
> What topics are you interested in? I could probably write decent explanation
On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Sergio Villar Senin wrote:
> En 21/01/13 23:07, Maciej Stachowiak escribiu:
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Adam. It's fine to pick up the conversation later, and we're
>> certainly open to iterating beyond what we do first.
>
En 21/01/13 23:07, Maciej Stachowiak escribiu:
>
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
>> Some folks have pointed out to me off thread that I'm coming off as
>> angry and harsh. I would like to apologize for my tone.
>>
>> My goal here is not to obstruct or block your progress on
On Jan 21, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Some folks have pointed out to me off thread that I'm coming off as
> angry and harsh. I would like to apologize for my tone.
>
> My goal here is not to obstruct or block your progress on the
> NetworkProcess. My goal is to end up with a commo
Some folks have pointed out to me off thread that I'm coming off as
angry and harsh. I would like to apologize for my tone.
My goal here is not to obstruct or block your progress on the
NetworkProcess. My goal is to end up with a common design that we can
share between WebKit2 and Chromium or at
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Jan 20, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>
> I take your word for it that it's not possible on Windows.
>
>
> Given that Chromium has many users on Windows (and other non-
On Jan 20, 2013, at 1:44 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
I take your word for it that it's not possible on Windows.
>>>
>>> Given that Chromium has many users on Windows (and other non-Mac
>>> platforms), you should now understand why this desig
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Oliver Hunt wrote:
>>> I take your word for it that it's not possible on Windows.
>>
>> Given that Chromium has many users on Windows (and other non-Mac
>> platforms), you should now understand why this design does not fit
>> well with Chromium's design constraints
>>
>> I take your word for it that it's not possible on Windows.
>
> Given that Chromium has many users on Windows (and other non-Mac
> platforms), you should now understand why this design does not fit
> well with Chromium's design constraints.
But chromium doesn't use webkit or webkit2, so i'm
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you think thread in the UI process vs. completely separate process is a
>>> topic worth discussing? It seems like
Hi Adam,
You raise a number of interesting points which I'll try to address.
On Jan 12, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> Do you think thread in the UI process vs. completely separate process is a
>> topic worth discussing
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Is that really the case? If so, I'm surprised that the patches for
>
On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>>
>>> Is that really the case? If so, I'm surprised that the patches for
>>> the shared memory cache and the NetworkProcess landed.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>> If you're actually planning to make a significant complexity-imposing
>>> architectural change for performance reasons, without any way to test
>>> whether it delivers the claimed per
On Jan 11, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
>>
>> If you're actually planning to make a significant complexity-imposing
>> architectural change for performance reasons, without any way to test
>> whether it delivers the claimed performance benefits, or how it compares to
>> less complex
15 matches
Mail list logo