[webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-04 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > I would also like to throw out the idea of pulling the layout tests > out into their own repo, maybe even per platform. How do we keep webkit/layout repositories in sync? > Currently the huge number of layout tests in WebKit make many gi

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-04 Thread Ryan Leavengood
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > Indeed, I'm against this idea. You make good points. There may be solutions to your objections, but they might not be much better than having a slow git status right now. Do other people who use WebKit with Git see this problem? If so, wha

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-04 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Ryan Leavengood wrote: > > You make good points. There may be solutions to your objections, but > they might not be much better than having a slow git status right now. > > Do other people who use WebKit with Git see this problem? If so, what > do you do to stay pro

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-04 Thread Alan Stearns
On 11/4/11 3:09 PM, "Ryan Leavengood" wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> >> Indeed, I'm against this idea. > > You make good points. There may be solutions to your objections, but > they might not be much better than having a slow git status right now. > > Do othe

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-04 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > Once we figure out how to support imported reftests, we should be > encouraging people to use reftests internally (even for tests we have no > intention of pushing to the W3C) instead of dumprendertree or pixel tests > (where possible - I assum

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-07 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Nov 4, 2011 4:59 PM, "Dirk Pranke" wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Alan Stearns wrote: > > Once we figure out how to support imported reftests, we should be > > encouraging people to use reftests internally (even for tests we have no > > intention of pushing to the W3C) instead of d

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-07 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Nov 7, 2011 8:00 PM, "Ryosuke Niwa" wrote: > I'd argue that we should not encourage people from writing reftests until we migrate those two ports to NRWT and https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60605 is fixed given all but Chromium port's bots run pixel tests. I meant to say only Chromium

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-07 Thread David Levin
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > On Nov 4, 2011 4:59 PM, "Dirk Pranke" wrote: > > Actually, we should be encouraging people to use reftests now, since > > every port but two supports them, and we should be moving the last two > > over ASAP. > > I'd argue that we should not e

Re: [webkit-dev] Putting layout tests on a separate repository (was "Supporting w3c ref tests and changing our convention")

2011-11-07 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:47 PM, David Levin wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > >> On Nov 4, 2011 4:59 PM, "Dirk Pranke" wrote: >> > Actually, we should be encouraging people to use reftests now, since >> > every port but two supports them, and we should be moving the