I opened a meta-bug at https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138561
I also plan to close bugs related to the previous "stream API"
proposal (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110194 and
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110558).
2014-11-03 7:57 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Poulain :
> It looks
O Lun, 03-11-2014 ás 10:08 +0100, youenn fablet escribiu:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> > I have two concerns:
> > 1) You have many patches waiting for review. I think you need to get better
> > communication channels with reviewers in order to iterate over your patches
> > faster. It is unfortunate but gett
In any case, ensuring that the streams API works efficiently for HTTP
exchanges in WebKit is top priority imho, no matter whether tied to
fetch or XHR at the end of the day.
2014-11-02 17:34 GMT+01:00 Anne van Kesteren :
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:56 PM, youenn fablet wrote:
>> Meaning that only
Hi Benjamin,
> I have two concerns:
> 1) You have many patches waiting for review. I think you need to get better
> communication channels with reviewers in order to iterate over your patches
> faster. It is unfortunate but getting complex patches reviewed in WebKit
> requires poking reviewers dir
It looks like nobody has raised any concern against Streams API. We even
got positive feedback from Anne. :)
I have two concerns:
1) You have many patches waiting for review. I think you need to get
better communication channels with reviewers in order to iterate over
your patches faster. It i
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 2:56 PM, youenn fablet wrote:
> Meaning that only the fetch API would at some point support streams?
> If so, I wonder why we should postpone a small but useful feature to a
> nice but future API.
I suspect there will be many APIs that support streams. It's been a
sorely mi
Meaning that only the fetch API would at some point support streams?
If so, I wonder why we should postpone a small but useful feature to a
nice but future API.
2014-10-31 8:48 GMT+01:00 Anne van Kesteren :
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:02 AM, youenn fablet wrote:
>> I would like to add support fo
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Benjamin Poulain wrote:
> Any opinion for or against Streams? Do you know if Mozilla intends to
> implement it?
I'm in favor of having IO streams :-) There's so many features that
could be made better by having them. I don't think anyone from Mozilla
has looked at
On 10/31/14, 12:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:02 AM, youenn fablet wrote:
I would like to add support for the streams API, starting
with readable streams and their integration with XHR and loaders.
This work is expected to happen behind a flag.
There's no planned i
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:02 AM, youenn fablet wrote:
> I would like to add support for the streams API, starting
> with readable streams and their integration with XHR and loaders.
> This work is expected to happen behind a flag.
There's no planned integration with XMLHttpRequest.
--
https:/
Hi all,
I would like to add support for the streams API ([1], [2]), starting
with readable streams and their integration with XHR and loaders.
This work is expected to happen behind a flag.
Regards,
Youenn
[1] https://github.com/whatwg/streams
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/streams-api/
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
