then.
Thanks again for the help
Chris
From: Mark Lam [mailto:mark@apple.com]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 4:14 PM
To: Vienneau, Christopher
Cc: webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Using OfflineAsm
On Sep 5, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Mark Lam
mark@apple.commailto:mark
Hello,
I'm looking for some information about the Java script interpreter ASM backend,
aka OfflineAsm.
First a bit of background information; the code I have been using is about a
year old, on several platforms we don't run with JIT and won't be able to
enable it. This means that we've been
On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Vienneau, Christopher cvienn...@ea.com wrote:
Hello,
I’m looking for some information about the Java script interpreter ASM
backend, aka OfflineAsm.
First a bit of background information; the code I have been using is about a
year old, on several
Christopher,
Let me add a little to Phil’s comments.
As Phil says, you shouldn’t expect much if any performance gain going from the
C LOOP to one of the assembler back ends if you also don’t plan on enabling
JITs.
The architectures / OS combinations that work with the LLInt is nearly the same
Hi Chris,
I’ll try to answer your questions below …
On Sep 5, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Vienneau, Christopher cvienn...@ea.com wrote:
Hello,
I’m looking for some information about the Java script interpreter ASM
backend, aka OfflineAsm.
First a bit of background information; the code I
On Sep 5, 2014, at 4:05 PM, Mark Lam mark@apple.com wrote:
4) Should I actually expect a performance increase compared to the “C
LOOP”?
Yes. The ASM LLINT should be faster than the C LOOP LLINT.
To clarify, the C LOOP LLINT emulated a CPU’s behavior using emitted C
6 matches
Mail list logo
