Re: [webkit-dev] free functions

2010-06-10 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Darin Adler wrote: >> On May 25, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: >> >>> I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations do >>> not depend on private data. >>> >>> There is a sch

Re: [webkit-dev] free functions

2010-06-03 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Darin Adler wrote: > On May 25, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: > >> I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations do not >> depend on private data. >> >> There is a school of thought that such functions are better non-member >> b

Re: [webkit-dev] free functions

2010-05-25 Thread Darin Adler
On May 25, 2010, at 7:54 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote: > I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations do not > depend on private data. > > There is a school of thought that such functions are better non-member > because it reduces the number of functions coupled to private

[webkit-dev] free functions

2010-05-25 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Hi, I have a question regarding WebKit's stance on free functions. I sometimes come across public member functions whose implementations do not depend on private data. There is a school of thought that such functions are better non-member because it reduces the number of functions coupled to priv