I like the idea. I'm not sure I agree w/ Adam that I'd roll the code
into DRT, insofar as I don't know how big it is and I would definitely
want the code shared across all of the DRT implementations. I'd
probably also do a pass over all of the existing PNGs at some point
rather than wait for them
In deciding whether to just let the PNGs get shrunk over time or to do a
pass over all of them at once, I think we should decide what we are trying
to optimize for. (Download time for initial checkout of the webkit tree?
Time for existing developers to update their trees? Storage space in the
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Elliot Poger epo...@google.com wrote:
In deciding whether to just let the PNGs get shrunk over time or to do a
pass over all of them at once, I think we should decide what we are trying
to optimize for. (Download time for initial checkout of the webkit tree?
Hi guys,
Just thought I'd share the results of an experiment I did in optimising the
png files in LayoutTests.
I used a tool on Mac called ImageOptim (http://imageoptim.pornel.net/)
which tries a set of different png lossless optimising tools (like pngcrush
- I also downloaded and included
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Mike Lawther mikelawt...@chromium.org wrote:
Just thought I'd share the results of an experiment I did in optimising the
png files in LayoutTests.
I used a tool on Mac called ImageOptim (http://imageoptim.pornel.net/) which
tries a set of different png
5 matches
Mail list logo
