Posted a patch to expose layoutTestController as testRunner on
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88210
- Ryosuke
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or
> if you don’t like that name, maybe testHarnes
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
>
>> I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or
>> if you don’t like that name, maybe testHarness
On May 31, 2012, at 3:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or if
> you don’t like that name, maybe testHarness or some even better name.
>
> "testController" seems like a misn
Darin, sorry for derailing this thread. I suppose I should have changed the
subject. :)
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
> Just a heads-up: there is a meta bug tracking this at
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87284 .
>
> A few folks have been going through
2012/5/31 Dan Bernstein :
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
>>
>> I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or
>> if you don’t like that name, maybe testHarness or some even better name.
>
>
2012/5/31 Ojan Vafai :
> testController seems fine to me. I agree it's an improvement.
>
> On the other hand there are other tasks that have more benefit in terms of
> code maintenance for people wanting to spend time working in this area. A
> couple ideas:
>
> Move more APIs that only depend WebCo
On May 31, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or if
> you don’t like that name, maybe testHarness or some even better name.
>
> "testController" seems like a mis
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> testController seems fine to me. I agree it's an improvement.
>
> On the other hand there are other tasks that have more benefit in terms of
> code maintenance for people wanting to spend time working in this area. A
> couple ideas:
>
>- M
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Darin Adler wrote:
> I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or
> if you don’t like that name, maybe testHarness or some even better name.
>
"testController" seems like a misnomer since it doesn't really control the
test itself. I
testController seems fine to me. I agree it's an improvement.
On the other hand there are other tasks that have more benefit in terms of
code maintenance for people wanting to spend time working in this area. A
couple ideas:
- Move more APIs that only depend WebCore code to internals. Reduces
On 5/31/12 11:56 AM, "Darin Adler" wrote:
>I am thinking we should rename layoutTestController to testController. Or
>if you don¹t like that name, maybe testHarness or some even better name.
testHarness is probably not a good choice as the W3C JavaScript framework
that recently landed in WebK
11 matches
Mail list logo
