Re: Relationships howto

2006-02-02 Thread Art Isbell
On Feb 2, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Jim Wong wrote: too used to the normal DB lingo...yah...got to call them entities, attributes and objects. as i have mentioned, I have the 2 entities COMPANY and COUNTRY already. I want a WOPopup in a web component (called newCompany) to display all the ctryNam

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread apl
Hello Cliff / Ken; Could you change a few words on the Apple website in order that this information could be made clear from reading the WebObjects product page? One question that Denis has raised that hasn't been spelt out is the question of "wotaskd". Is it going to be on-going policy

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Denis Stanton
Hi Ken I appreciate your effort to help. I'm really hoping to get clear answer from Apple. For every webobjects developer who has contributed to this discussion on the past by saying "It is clear that you do not need a license for Y" there has been another coming along the next day sayin

Re: Relationships howto

2006-02-02 Thread Jim Wong
Hi:In fact I have gone thru the documentations before already. I also have the EOModel set up already. too used to the normal DB lingo...yah...got to call them entities, attributes and objects.as i have mentioned, I have the 2 entities COMPANY and COUNTRY already. I want a WOPopup in a web componen

Re: Relationships howto

2006-02-02 Thread Jim Wong
Hi:In fact I have gone thru the documentations before already. I also have the EOModel set up already. too used to the normal DB lingo...yah...got to call them entities, attributes and objects.as i have mentioned, I have the 2 entities COMPANY and COUNTRY already. I want a WOPopup in a web componen

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Ken Anderson
Denis, In my view, Cliff made it very clear here: The WebObjects Developer license is the one we modified in 5.3.1 to permit deployments on other platforms. There you go - if you have a WebObjects Developer license, you can deploy anywhere. The only sticking point (which Apple admits) is

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Denis Stanton
On 3/02/2006, at 1:48 PM, Cliff Tuel wrote: That changed again in 5.3.1! :) Deployment is now free, whatever the platform is. is it? http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/macosxserver.html That's the WebObjects Deployment license. The WebObjects Developer license is the one we modified in 5.

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Cliff Tuel
>> That changed again in 5.3.1! :) Deployment is now free, whatever >> the platform is. > > is it? > > http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/macosxserver.html That's the WebObjects Deployment license. The WebObjects Developer license is the one we modified in 5.3.1 to permit deployments on other pla

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel Arroz
Hi! Let's not go over it again! :) Check the recent mail-list archives. Yours Miguel Arroz On 2006/02/02, at 22:48, Alexander Spohr wrote: Am 02.02.2006 um 17:05 schrieb Miguel Arroz: That changed again in 5.3.1! :) Deployment is now free, whatever the platform is. is it? http:/

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Stefan Pantke
Am 02.02.2006 um 22:10 schrieb Marc Oesch: Consult the mail-list archives for lots of discussion about this, including some messages sent by Apple. The unsupported workaround from Apple for WO 5.3.1 deployment on other platforms can be found here: http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-

Re: Java Client Desktop app WO 5.3 APIs

2006-02-02 Thread Ian Joyner
Perhaps someone from Apple could clarify, but between Cocoa and WO, you are talking two very different things (as I'm sure you appreciate), so I don't think there is any reason to change how you develop Java-client apps with IB (I have a large project in it). The statement does say 'release

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Alexander Spohr
Am 02.02.2006 um 17:05 schrieb Miguel Arroz: That changed again in 5.3.1! :) Deployment is now free, whatever the platform is. is it? http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/macosxserver.html 2. Permitted License Uses and Restrictions. F. WebObjects Deployment Software. Subject to the terms and

Re: Feedback on development on MacTel iMac

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel Arroz
Hi! No... i'm using that on my powerbook, with OS X client (10.4.4). Oh, I just remember a possible cause to your problem... did you uncomment the necessary lines at /System/Library/StartupItems/ WebObjects/WebObjects file to startup wotaskd and, if you want, Monitor? Yours Miguel Arr

Re: Feedback on development on MacTel iMac

2006-02-02 Thread Thomas
Miguel, thanks, but I don't think that's it. I vaguely recall from many years ago that the standard Apache configuration has to be modified to support the MyHost/cgi-bin/WebObjects/MyApp.woa/-/wa/etc format. Regards Thomas On 03/02/2006, at 8:56, Miguel Arroz wrote: Hi! Just a wil

Re: Feedback on development on MacTel iMac

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel Arroz
Hi! Just a wild guess, but could that be related to WebObjects apache module not being compiled for intel platform? Yours Miguel Arroz On 2006/02/02, at 21:36, Thomas wrote: But seriously, there is just one fly in the ointment. I was not able to get my OSX Server apache configuration

Feedback on development on MacTel iMac

2006-02-02 Thread Thomas
The intel iMac (2 GHz) finally arrived, and am happy to report that it works very well for WO development. Here are some comparisons with my old development machine (G4 dual 1.25 GHz) working an a very big WO project:Build from clean:G4 = 65 secs, iMac = 40 secsRun a WO process that is computationa

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Marc Oesch
> Consult the mail-list archives for lots of discussion about this, > including some messages sent by Apple. The unsupported workaround from Apple for WO 5.3.1 deployment on other platforms can be found here: http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2005/Dec/msg00193.html Still waiting fo

OpenGIS Modeling for EOF

2006-02-02 Thread Kieran Kelleher
Has anyone built EOEnterpriseObject custom java classes and EOModel prototypes that represent the various OpenGIS Geometry Model geometry types that are supported by the MySQL 4.1 Spatial Extensions? http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/spatial-extensions.html -Kieran __

Java Client Desktop app WO 5.3 APIs

2006-02-02 Thread Ken Tabb
Hi folks, it's noddy question time and I may well be barking up the wrong tree here but... I'm about to embark upon some new Java Client Desktop WO 5.3 apps (that also have a web interface for other aspects of the same app). All the desktop apps will be run on macs (10.4 or later). While

Stopping EODisplayGroups fetching?

2006-02-02 Thread Ian Joyner
I have a Java-Client application that has several panels in a single window in a master-detail interface. In order to speed the opening of a window, I have a mechanism whereby only display groups shown on a panel are fetched. When the user clicks a tab, the display groups on the newly displayed pan

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Miguel Arroz
Hi! That changed again in 5.3.1! :) Deployment is now free, whatever the platform is. Consult the mail-list archives for lots of discussion about this, including some messages sent by Apple. Yours Miguel Arroz On 2006/02/02, at 13:22, Niels Meersschaert wrote: Actually, what has

Re: WebObjects Licensing

2006-02-02 Thread Niels Meersschaert
Actually, what has changed is the new version WebObjects 5.3 is free for development on OS X as part of Xcode. You get the deployment license for free with OS X Server or if you buy an Xserve which includes the server OS. If you need to deploy to other platforms or develop on Windows, the

Re: EnterpriseObjects in a regular Java application

2006-02-02 Thread Michael DeMan
Yeah, this question is always a weird one and I have a whole new twist on the entire thing. For our batch jobs I do it in a completely screwball way with WO 5.2.4. I need a WOSession and context because we e-mail out WOComponents and things during some of the batch jobs for billing and o