I have been running this model for six months and saving this entity
just fine. Suddenly, I am getting an optimistic locking failure when
doing an insert of a new record (that's right insert, not update). In
fact is the trace below, I show that the offending record is in the
editing context
Title: Macbook Performance!!
I have been using my new Macbook Pro (2.0 ghz, 2 gig RAM, 100 gig 7200rpm) for about a month and have been totally impressed with the performance.
Our app is a WOLips/Eclipse/WO 5.2.4/Cayenne application with 3 frameworks, 2 applications, and a set of web services d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:23 PM, wojingo wrote:
I was wondering if you have read the book available on the svn website?
I have not read it in depth, but I did look through it before posting.
I missed this.
This is a section about tags that seems relevant.
I ima
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:23 PM, wojingo wrote:
I was wondering if you have read the book available on the svn
website?
I have not read it in depth, but I did look through it before
posting. I missed this.
This is a section about tags that seems relevant.
I imagine that this could be used
Wow. I never thought I would actually miss the cvs tag command...
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:23 PM, wojingo wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, Subversion doesn't have an official tag command.
The "svn way" to do tags is to take a snapshot of the current
state of the repos
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is, Subversion doesn't have an official tag command. The
"svn way" to do tags is to take a snapshot of the current state of the
repository, by making a copy of it in a special /tags directory. That
means, I think, that there is no way to tag-and-m
On Mar 13, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Zak Burke wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 3/13/06 4:53 PM:
Thanks, Zak. I follow you, but I'm still confused about one
thing. How are you creating the source directory, the one being
accessed by APP in your release.sh script?
I haven't made the leap to Svn
On 13/03/2006, at 5:38 PM, Art Isbell wrote:
On Mar 12, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
But maybe my unease with these systems is that they seem more file-
based because that's "the way computers and Unix work", rather
than patch-based which would result from thinking about the
develop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 3/13/06 4:53 PM:
Thanks, Zak. I follow you, but I'm still confused about one thing. How
are you creating the source directory, the one being accessed by APP in
your release.sh script?
I haven't made the leap to Svn so I have no idea how this would work (or
not) in
Thanks, Zak. I follow you, but I'm still confused about one thing.
How are you creating the source directory, the one being accessed by
APP in your release.sh script?
In the CVS world, one could tag and then export, like you said, and
you might tag only a subset of the files that have act
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 3/13/06 3:25 PM:
Something I do frequently is push small changes from a dev site to a
live site. In CVS I do this by tagging the files in the dev site I want
to move over with "stable", then going over to the live site (which was
originally created by checking out on
I'm using CVSTrac and Trac for a couple of projects at work (we have both cvs and subversion repos). The ability to join up a bug reporting system with a wiki and the source code repo is extremely useful. Developers are encouraged to associate comments with tickets and wiki entries. Works very well
Hi list
perhaps another newbie like me will appreciate this tip: To have an
action require double confirmation (WOConfirmPanel only asks once) I
did this:
made a dblconfirm.scp file and added it into web resources. Contents
of the script file:
function dblconfirm(prompt)
{
if (confirm(pr
Ok, since people seem to be ok with this topic of conversation (and I
thank everyone who has participated!), here's one more.
Something I do frequently is push small changes from a dev site to a
live site. In CVS I do this by tagging the files in the dev site I
want to move over with "stab
Actually, that sounds to be exactly what I need. I know Joe mentioned
TLS but I didn't see any mention of a secure connection in EOModeler
so I couldn't tell if he was referring to abilities that may or may
not still be available. I had also heard that EOModeler itself was
extensible so I w
I'm not entirely sure what you need. But anyway... I have a
subclass of the JNDIAdaptorPlugin (think that is the name off the top
of my head) that uses TLS to encrypt all communication between the
app and the LDAP server. It still uses simple authentication, but
the authentication happen
Thanks Joe. That's a bummer. It seems like a pretty glaring omission
that any model you create is not really able to make a secure
connection to your JNDI data source. Does anyone else know of any
other options that might be possible for this?
Timothy Worman
UCLA - GSE&IS
Programmer Analyst
After all this excellent SCM discussion, I am convinced I need to
implement an SCM replacement for my daily lunchtime backup script at
work and my nightly backup script at home for my development Powerbook.
It seems, that for someone implementing a first-time SCM today for
small team develo
Jerry W. Walker wrote on 3/13/06 10:05 AM:
For any commercial project, I feel exposed
without a couple things in place: a good SCM system that supports
concurrent development among team members
I think Mike and Jerry have summarized the, "Is it worth it to even
bother with SCS?" issues very w
Hi All,
The Chicago Cocoa and WebObjects User Group (CAWUG) is holding our
next meeting this coming Tuesday, March 14th, at 6:00 PM at the Apple
Store on Michigan Ave. Hope to see you there.
Agenda:
- Introductions & Announcements
- Building Embeddable Frameworks by Jo
Heh, I feel so much more comfortable arguing against the conventional wisdom (as do most Mac and WebObjects users probably), but in this case, I've got to support the conventional wisdom where it recommends Source Code Management (SCM). For any commercial project, I feel exposed without a couple th
On 13 Mar 2006, at 01:38, Art Isbell wrote:
On Mar 12, 2006, at 6:28 PM, Ian Joyner wrote:
But maybe my unease with these systems is that they seem more file-
based because that's "the way computers and Unix work", rather
than patch-based which would result from thinking about the
develop
Just to leave no religious debate undebated :) I'm going to have to respectfully disagree on this one ... CVS, for example, certainly has its issues, but it takes 5 minutes to get it running, there's near zero administration for it, and it has really nice support built into Eclipse. If you use ex
23 matches
Mail list logo
