Thanks Jerry, I'll stop trying to do that and I'll follow the KVC way.
Cheers.
On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Jerry W. Walker wrote:
Hi, Marcos,
What you described is not supported in WebObjects as shown. You're
displaying a .wod file and WebObjects only parses the name=x> syntax in the .html
http://www.simple-talk.com/2006/04/06/agile-development-and-iconix/ -- Daryl Thachuk Montage Technologies Inc. http://www.montagetech.com On 12-Jun-06, at 12:24 PM, John Gilmore-Baldwin wrote: I work in a small shop, and most of our development until now has involved single people doing single
Hi, Marcos,
What you described is not supported in WebObjects as shown. You're
displaying a .wod file and WebObjects only parses the name=x> syntax in the .html file to relate it to the bindings in
the .wod file.
However, I can't see a good reason for doing what you're trying to do
here a
Hi List:
I've been thinking if it is possible to bind a WOString to a WOActiveImage filename binding for example, something like this:
String1: WOString {
value = "Bullet.jpg";
}
ActiveImage1: WOActiveImage {
filename = ;
framework = "app";
action = cancel;
}
Thanks in advanced! ___
Does anyone know of a good reference or examples that
can demonstrate model-view-controller?
I have found WO apps to be much more difficult to model using MVC
than Cocoa apps. Maybe one reason is because WO is a server-side
technology (ignoring Java Client :-) so Views aren't so obvious.
Hello Ken;
So what you're basically saying is, you're using the temporary
global ID as a way to reference items across the wire that are all
in the same server side editing context.
^^^ Yes that is about the long and short of it.
Sounds like a reasonable approach, but my guess is people at
http://www.awprofessional.com/title/0321278658http://pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/svn2/index.htmlChristianI work in a small shop, and most of our development until now has involved single people doing single projects. This has been a side effect of how things have operated here rather than a plan
Title: Implementing project life cycle system
I work in a small shop, and most of our development until now has involved single people doing single projects. This has been a side effect of how things have operated here rather than a plan.
I’m bringing more people into the development of project
Mike wrote on 06/07/2006 11:39:23 PM:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I haven't touched WO in a few years. But I got a problem at
work that
> in my mind just screams for WO D2W. So I managed to convince
my boss
> that it's worth at least a prototype. But he ain't going to
let me
> have
> a Mac just yet, so I'
Don,
Why do you have 2 methods for each? I see setIsCustodian and
setCustodian... Also, in setIsCustodian, you're sending a string to
takeStoredValueForKey:
takeStoredValueForKey((bValue?"1":"0"), "custodian");
where custodian should be a number, as shown in the setCustodian meth
Hello All;
Sorry, my last message came through as html markup. I made this one plain
text. Sorry for filling up your email boxes. I am using WO 5.3 on Tiger with
an Oracle 10G 10.0.3.0 database. I am able to render a listing of people with
two checkboxes (the fields in the database are numer
Don,
Wtihout your WOD file, it's difficult to determine what is going
wrong. My first guess is that you don't have the binding for the
WOCheckbox set correctly - a common mistake... you should be binding
to the 'checked' attribute. I assume the numerics are 0 and 1 ?
Ken
On Jun 12, 20
Hello All;
I am using WO 5.3 on Tiger with an Oracle 10G 10.0.3.0 database. I am able to
render a listing of people with two checkboxes (the fields in the database are
numeric for these checkboxes) The fields are named trainer and custodian.
Everything renders correctly, puling the correct
Andrew,
OK - thanks for the clarification. So what you're basically saying
is, you're using the temporary global ID as a way to reference items
across the wire that are all in the same server side editing context.
Sounds like a reasonable approach, but my guess is people at Apple
had the
Hello Ken;
I am authenticating with the system and obtaining a session. Further
WS invocations on the system are in the context of this session so
there is a default EC which I am using. I typically undertake a
number of WS invocations into my system to create a graph of modified/
insert
What good is serializing a temporary global ID? A temporary ID is
only good and useful in the editing context that created it. Can you
explain what you're attempting to do?
On Jun 12, 2006, at 5:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello;
Has anybody any further advice in this area? I'd like
Hello;
Has anybody any further advice in this area? I'd like to shift
EOTemporaryGlobalID-s from the client back to the server in order to
reference EO's that I'd made in previous web-services invocations.
EOTemporaryGlobalID-s serialise fine from WO... (the A's are fake
data obviously)
17 matches
Mail list logo
