On 15/05/2007, at 2:41 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 15/05/2007, at 2:30 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Example prototype:
MyPrototypes.eomodeld/
EOJDBCMySQLPrototypes.plist
<...>
{
allowsNull = Y;
columnName = "";
On 15/05/2007, at 2:30 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Example prototype:
MyPrototypes.eomodeld/
EOJDBCMySQLPrototypes.plist
<...>
{
allowsNull = Y;
columnName = "";
externalType = NUMERIC;
name = "decima
On May 14, 2007, at 9:24 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Hi there,
I've just reworked a model to utilise a prototypes model - but when
eogenerating the classes I'm finding that I'm no longer getting
BigDecimal, for example, in the signature but Number instead.
e.g.,
// template snippet...
publi
Hi there,
I've just reworked a model to utilise a prototypes model - but when
eogenerating the classes I'm finding that I'm no longer getting
BigDecimal, for example, in the signature but Number instead.
e.g.,
// template snippet...
public <$Attribute.javaValueClassName$> <$Attribute.name$
On May 14, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I was running pre-deployment tests on code which had not itself
been changed and I got a deadlock. The only app change that I can
think that might be affecting this is the fact that I have the EOF
stack synchronizer turned on in this la
On May 14, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Do you have multiple EOF stacks? If not, just use
EOSharedEditingContext.defaultSharedEditingContext()
Chuck
Oh yes, that does it nicely.
Thanks,
Baiss
On May 14, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Baiss Eric Magnusson wrote:
In re-designing a WO app I ha
Do you have multiple EOF stacks? If not, just use
EOSharedEditingContext.defaultSharedEditingContext()
Chuck
On May 14, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Baiss Eric Magnusson wrote:
In re-designing a WO app I have worked on for a year the customer
wants the "top level navigation" to go to about 60 differe
In re-designing a WO app I have worked on for a year the customer
wants the "top level navigation" to go to about 60 different
WOComponents from Direct Action calls, which are invoked by WOPopup's
calling , with the additional binding menuEO.primaryKeyId>, thus passing a Primary Key ID to the
Oops, sent to wrong list now sending to wodev
---
I was running pre-deployment tests on code which had not itself been
changed and I got a deadlock. The only app change that I can think
that might be affecting
Yes. Ever used that approach? Did it work for you?
Sorry, no I've not ever tried it myself. I try to limit myself to
simple integer PKs (except in extreme circumstances like when dealing
with legacy system, which in my case stored procedures we're
practical anyway).
Yes, they are genera
Hi Robert,
1. Is this the technique you are using to trigger your stored
procedures:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/UsingEOModeler/
6WorkingWithEntities/chapter_6_section_5.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/
TP30001018-CH206-BABGBCJE
Yes. Ever used that approach? Did it work
1. Is this the technique you are using to trigger your stored
procedures:
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/WebObjects/UsingEOModeler/
6WorkingWithEntities/chapter_6_section_5.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/
TP30001018-CH206-BABGBCJE
2. Are your stored procedures doing something more compl
Just use optimistic locking (the little lock icon in Entity Modeler)
and do a try/catch on ec.saveChanges and catch EOGeneralAdaptorException
On May 14, 2007, at 2:01 PM, YL wrote:
It's a config table, I want to make sure onle one person can
change it at a
time.
Assume multiple people have
That sounds like pessimistic locking. WO is more oriented at
optimistic locking, but that can get complex to handle with you have
multiple instances (EOF handles this differently when conflicts
happen within one EOF stack and when they happen across EOF stacks).
I'd work out how to deal wi
It's a config table, I want to make sure onle one person can change it at a
time.
Assume multiple people have the access for changing the table remotely.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "YL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:58 AM
Sub
On May 14, 2007, at 2:14 AM, Johan Henselmans wrote:
I am settting up a database in which we want to store information
about products and their attributes.
However, we do not know in advance what attributes will be part of
the product, apart from a few (price, date-available etc). So I
c
Locking is at the editing context level. What are you trying to do?
Chuck
On May 12, 2007, at 7:08 PM, YL wrote:
Is there a way to lock an entity to prevent other accesses to it
(even refuse read/fetch) during the current transaction?
Thanks
--
Practical WebObjects - for developers who
On May 13, 2007, at 10:33 PM, Thomas wrote:
Chuck,
as always, your advice was spot on. It was worth buying your book
(amongst many other reasons) if it encouraged you to keep
contributing to this forum.
As if I could stop! :-)
The system with the problem is a CMS. It turns out that th
I am not an Apple person, but here is my guess:
http://www.lyricsfreak.com/s/sex+pistols/god+save+the
+queen_20123626.html
:-P
Chuck
On May 14, 2007, at 6:10 AM, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:
Dear Apple people who are monitoring this list,
PLEASE, be so kind to tell us what we can expect i
Hi all,
I am trying to get some stored procedures performing after insertion
of new records. The stored procedures generate unique number for
records. That reason why I am using stored procedures is that the
generation can only be done properly on the SQL level. The procedures
themselves
Hi Johan,
I am currently doing something similar. However, due to the amounts
database rows that your kind of a solution would warrant in our
situation, I have thought of a different approach.
I will use your terminology (table names etc) to try to explain.
It comes down to defining a Pro
Dear Apple people who are monitoring this list,
PLEASE, be so kind to tell us what we can expect in regard to the
WebObjects java client development. Please try to answer the following:
1. Will JavaClient runtime stuff still be a part of WebObjects?
2. Will Direct To Java Client still be a p
I am settting up a database in which we want to store information
about products and their attributes.
However, we do not know in advance what attributes will be part of
the product, apart from a few (price, date-available etc). So I came
up with the idea to use a separate table for product
Groovy supports a form of rapid swing ui prototyping using their
SwingBuilder interface. You could possibly use this as an
alternative. There is also a GroovySWT library that works in a
similar fashion.
On 14/05/2007, at 4:25 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On May 9, 2007, at 4:36 PM, David
24 matches
Mail list logo
