Well, that seems to kill that theory. :-)
That does not really look like Jerry's pet bug as the switching of
the conditional should be consistent (assuming the batches and items
in each batch are in an deterministic order.
Is it possible that the action method is not returning the edit pag
Thanks Chuck,
Here is the code:
protected Integer previousBatchNumber = new Integer(-1);
protected Integer currentBatchNumber;
public void setAnItem(Item newAnItem)
{
if(!(newAnItem == null)) {
currentBatchNumber = (Integer) newAn
How is "isFirstItemInABatch" determined? That sounds like your
problem. It seems like this returns true only once, when the page is
first drawn.
Chuck
On May 23, 2007, at 4:55 PM, David Holt wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am having problems with a boolean changing the structure of my
page
Hello everyone,
I am having problems with a boolean changing the structure of my page
- a la Jerry's pet bug :-)
The usual answer is to set the boolean in the appendToResponse. In my
case, the conditional applies to multiple items and the boolean is
determined from a value in the item in th
On 24/05/2007, at 12:48 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
I'm using an old version of the Wonder AJAX Framework (before it
became Wonder!). I'm still using that because I did some
modifications (flexibility and security) that I don't want to
loose. One day I have to talk to someone to integr
The people I listen to, ChuckH, MikeS, and others from this list,
are excited about the with Wonder.
FWIW, I'm totally biased on this topic :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (W
For structured coding and debugging, GWT takes a completely different
approach, you write and debug your code in Java and it gets cross-
compiled into javascript. It's certainly worth looking at, but it's
more intended for apps like gmail where the entire application runs
in the browser and the ap
Yeah that's the method you're looking for ... This just got a little
bit of a facelift for use with multiple eof stacks last week, so you
might want to use that version.
ms
On May 23, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
Am 23.05.2007 um 10:53 schrieb Miguel Arroz:
I see that the meth
Am 23.05.2007 um 10:53 schrieb Miguel Arroz:
I see that the method
ERXEOAccessUtilities.rowCountForFetchSpecification(context,
specification) is deprecated. Is there any new way to do this?
I guess you could use:
ERXEOControlUtilities.objectCountWithQualifier(ec, entityName,
qualifier)
Hi!
I see that the method
ERXEOAccessUtilities.rowCountForFetchSpecification(context,
specification) is deprecated. Is there any new way to do this?
(I know this is Wonder-related, but I tried to sent this email
twice to the Wonder mail-list, and I got the mail back with the error:
Hi!
I'm using an old version of the Wonder AJAX Framework (before it
became Wonder!). I'm still using that because I did some
modifications (flexibility and security) that I don't want to loose.
One day I have to talk to someone to integrate this in Wonder! :)
In the JS side, I'm usin
another javascript library: http://jquery.com
I only looked at it briefly, done some demo, looked at the plugin
architecture, impressive and interesting.
- jfv
Le 07-05-23 à 09:37, Mike Schrag a écrit :
A short version of the question: which toolkit? why?
Prototype/Scriptaculous are sort of
On 23/05/2007, at 10:37 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Sorry for an OT question.
Briefly got out of the black hole of backend development, and into
the much-hyped world of dynamic web UI. Need to make a decision on
a JavaScript toolkit to do various dynamic widgets for a set of web
applicat
Thanks Mike, I need to looks at Wonder Ajax.framework sources to
maybe borrow some ideas.
Andrus
On May 23, 2007, at 4:37 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
A short version of the question: which toolkit? why?
Prototype/Scriptaculous are sort of the 800 lb gorilla ... Rails
picked it, and it has beco
At the moment I am targeting tapestry 4.0, but I am trying to get a
general picture, as a frontend framework change down the road is a
real possibility. So I am looking more into a use pattern with a
certain WO-like category of Java frameworks.
Thanks
Andrus
On May 23, 2007, at 4:37 PM, D
Have you looked at the Ajax framework in Project Wonder and how it's
reusable widgets are constructed?
On May 23, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Sorry for an OT question.
Briefly got out of the black hole of backend development, and into
the much-hyped world of dynamic web UI. Ne
A short version of the question: which toolkit? why?
Prototype/Scriptaculous are sort of the 800 lb gorilla ... Rails
picked it, and it has become sort of the de facto. They're very good
as a base, but scriptaculous doesn't really define any higher level
widgets. Ajax.framework is built on
On 23-May-07, at 8:37 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Sorry for an OT question.
Briefly got out of the black hole of backend development, and into
the much-hyped world of dynamic web UI. Need to make a decision on
a JavaScript toolkit to do various dynamic widgets for a set of web
applications
And I will chip in and say that if you want a really simple and
elegant java web framework, look at Click (http://click.sf.net/) -
simple code, lashings of examples, and great docs.
Geoff
On 21/05/07, Sam Barnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wicket is really sweet. I'd just like to toss in a reco
Sorry for an OT question.
Briefly got out of the black hole of backend development, and into
the much-hyped world of dynamic web UI. Need to make a decision on a
JavaScript toolkit to do various dynamic widgets for a set of web
applications.
A short version of the question: which toolkit?
Hi Travis,
that's exactly what I have done. But I always get a segementation
fault when I add mod_WebObjects into the httpd.conf.
I removed it now and put it into an external configuration file and
then I got a more "exact" error message:
start httpd: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/httpd:
21 matches
Mail list logo
