Oops, dropped in the Wonder 5.4 frameworks instead of 5.3. That took
care of everything. Sorry.
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:49 PM, Daniel Brajkovic wrote:
I just did a brand new install of Eclipse 3.3.2, WOlips nightly
build and the latest Project wonder. I created a new project, an
EOModel, E
I just did a brand new install of Eclipse 3.3.2, WOlips nightly build
and the latest Project wonder. I created a new project, an EOModel,
EOGenerated Classes and then tried to run the Application, just to
make sure everything is OK. (BTW, I'm using WO 5.3.3)
Well, lo and behold, I get this
Hi!
On 2008/03/17, at 23:33, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 18.03.2008 um 00:18 schrieb Chuck Hill:
Me too, now. Thank you kindly. Things are getting full and
expensive in that part of town.
Expensive? If the dollar continues to do what it does, you can *buy*
the hotel when you get there!
Me too, now. Thank you kindly. Things are getting full and
expensive in that part of town.
Expensive? If the dollar continues to do what it does, you can *buy*
the hotel when you get there!
Sure ... Kick the little guy.
ms
___
Do not post admi
On Mar 17, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
Am 18.03.2008 um 00:18 schrieb Chuck Hill:
Me too, now. Thank you kindly. Things are getting full and
expensive in that part of town.
Expensive? If the dollar continues to do what it does, you can *buy*
the hotel when you get there!
E
Am 18.03.2008 um 00:18 schrieb Chuck Hill:
Me too, now. Thank you kindly. Things are getting full and
expensive in that part of town.
Expensive? If the dollar continues to do what it does, you can *buy*
the hotel when you get there!
Cheers, Anjo
___
On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:55 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 17-Mar-08, at 6:31 PM, David Holt wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a paucity of hotel rooms available that
weekend? Does anyone have any suggestions for a good place to stay?
The Parc and Marriott are full which is surprising given their
si
I'm thinking of going to Statford, they have good reviews on Expedia.
http://www.hotelstratford.com
Is anyone else seeing a paucity of hotel rooms available that
weekend? Does anyone have any suggestions for a good place to stay?
The Parc and Marriott are full which is surprising giv
On 17-Mar-08, at 6:31 PM, David Holt wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a paucity of hotel rooms available that
weekend? Does anyone have any suggestions for a good place to stay?
The Parc and Marriott are full which is surprising given their size.
Darn iPhone developers ;-)
d
How much do yo
Parc 55 was full even before the WWDC announcement :-(
Is anyone else seeing a paucity of hotel rooms available that
weekend? Does anyone have any suggestions for a good place to stay?
The Parc and Marriott are full which is surprising given their
size. Darn iPhone developers ;-)
d
On 17
Is anyone else seeing a paucity of hotel rooms available that
weekend? Does anyone have any suggestions for a good place to stay?
The Parc and Marriott are full which is surprising given their size.
Darn iPhone developers ;-)
d
On 17-Mar-08, at 1:55 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Hello WO dude
On Mar 17, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
okay. I thought I would wait and download the newest
and most updated eclipse and WOLips I have this
problem with stalling.. I click to start eclipse and I
get the dialog asking which workspace to use.. I click
the default and say ok
are you on a network login ?
if so try moving your workspace to the local drive, rather than a
network based location.
Simon
On 17 Mar 2008, at 21:28, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
okay. I thought I would wait and download the newest
and most updated eclipse and WOLips I have this
problem w
okay. I thought I would wait and download the newest
and most updated eclipse and WOLips I have this
problem with stalling.. I click to start eclipse and I
get the dialog asking which workspace to use.. I click
the default and say ok. It appears to be loading
and then the status bar just st
My apps don't have any real problems. :-) Yeah, right.
Good to know though. I am doing some batch fetching in certain places
and I'm sure some future version of my apps could use tuning but I'm
just glad I'm not handicapping anything too badly.
Tim
-
Timothy Worman
Programmer/Analyst
Gr
On 17-Mar-08, at 4:54 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
On 13-Mar-08, at 5:27 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
It should be a two days event. I don't know if it will be before
or after WWDC, I have to check with the Marriott and the Parc 55
hotels.
Hey Pascal!
If there's a choice, I'd vote for before WWD
Hello WO dudes and dudettes,
WOWODC is coming in SFO on June 7th/June 8th. I made a quick (two
questions) survey to better evaluate how much people will attend this
year:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=aa4_2bWOr0B6SQ_2bewgY5NJKg_3d_3d
We hope to see you there!
_
On 13-Mar-08, at 5:27 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
It should be a two days event. I don't know if it will be before
or after WWDC, I have to check with the Marriott and the Parc 55
hotels.
Hey Pascal!
If there's a choice, I'd vote for before WWDC. That way, there's no
chance of us talking a
Hi David,
This is how we are retrofitting most of our array loops; now since WO
5.4:
public void doThisForAllProducts(EOEditingContext ec) {
for (Product aProduct : products())
aProduct.doThis(ec);
}
Nice and simple, eh?
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra, M.B.A.[sfu
Ah, I misunderstood what Chuck was trying to say. Yes, this is fixed
in Wonder (also for 5.3). And our toArray also works.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 17.03.2008 um 19:02 schrieb Anjo Krank:
Correct, this was fixed a while ago, but toArray wasn't fixed.
Am 17.03.2008 um 17:58 schrieb Chuck Hill:
Yes,
It's good to know this. I have just found myself using it a lot and
wanted to know if I was doing things the right way or not. If you
hadn't noticed, in the past, several of my practices were considered
less than optimal. :-)
I guess I now have reading to do on Batch Fetching...
Dave
On
+1
Even though I'm working primarily with JavaClient.
On Mar 17, 2008, at 04:13, Oliver Scheel wrote:
I feel a lot more confident about using WO for new work now than I
ever
have in the past couple of years.
That's true. After taking the J2EE/Apache round trip I enjoy
porgramming
with
This is fixed in WO 5.4
Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:55, David Avendasora wrote:
I think I mis-spoke. It doesn't return an array of faults. If the
relationship itself is a fault, simply calling products() without
the .toArray() in a for loop returns a fau
Yeah ... +1 here. By far your performance problems are going to be
inefficient use of EOF. For instance, if you're traversing
relationships of relationships, you will want to make sure you have
batch fetched them appropriately. See ERXRecursiveBatchFetching in
Wonder.
ms
On Mar 17, 20
Enumeration should be slightly slower.
But you are wasting your time looking at this to optimize your WO
apps. Go find a real problem.
Chuck
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Timmy wrote:
All:
How does java Enumeration compare to this with regard to
performance? I iterate through my EO's
All:
How does java Enumeration compare to this with regard to performance?
I iterate through my EO's almost always using Enumeration - um because
that's how I was "learned."
T
-
Programmer/Analyst
Graduate School of Education and Information Studies
University of California Los Angeles
Correct, this was fixed a while ago, but toArray wasn't fixed.
Am 17.03.2008 um 17:58 schrieb Chuck Hill:
Yes, that is a bug on NSArray (I think) that results in the fault
not being fired if you call one of the Java collection methods.
Which, of course, the new Java for loop calls.
It is
On 17-Mar-08, at 1:38 PM, Simon McLean wrote:
I'm not being rude about it, just wondering if it's one of those
things that everyone tolerates because "that's the way it is". I'd
put it quite high on the list of "confusing-things-to-get-your-
head-around-when-moving-to-eclipse". It just does
Yeah, I agree. Flexibility is good as an advanced option, but stick
the shackles on to begin with - If anything you avoid questions from
dummies like me :-)
I'm sure this must have been suggested before, but how about fluffy
being the default for a new WOnder app in eclipse ?
It's the defau
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
I'm not being rude about it, just wondering if it's one of those
things that everyone tolerates because "that's the way it is". I'd
put it quite high on the list of "confusing-things-to-get-your-
head-around-when-moving-to-eclipse". It just
I'm not being rude about it, just wondering if it's one of those
things that everyone tolerates because "that's the way it is". I'd
put it quite high on the list of "confusing-things-to-get-your-head-
around-when-moving-to-eclipse". It just doesn't feel intuitive.
Whereas putting your compon
On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:04 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it
comes to source control ?
For years, I just swore at them.
I've done a bit of that too!
The best practice is probably to migrate your project structure
to the Fluffy Bunny Layou
Give me some credit! In my actual code I had replaced the simple text
attribute names with their Entity.ATTRIBUTE_KEY static final String
equivelent, so my code was at least somewhat reliable.
It just didn't work is all.
Dave
On Mar 17, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Sure, go and g
Does anyone actually like the pattern set stuff ? I'm not being rude
about it, just wondering if it's one of those things that everyone
tolerates because "that's the way it is". I'd put it quite high on
the list of "confusing-things-to-get-your-head-around-when-moving-to-
eclipse". It just d
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it comes
to source control ?
For years, I just swore at them.
I've done a bit of that too!
The best practice is probably to migrate your project structure to
the Fluffy Bunny Layout (I really should make a Wiki page for
that) and h
HI Miguel,
On Mar 16, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
I have an entity A where each object contains some references to
other objects in entity B (each A contains some Bs, but each B is on
a diferente relation). The relations are one-to-one, and are modeled
only from A to B.
That
Yes, that is a bug on NSArray (I think) that results in the fault not
being fired if you call one of the Java collection methods. Which, of
course, the new Java for loop calls.
It is a Wonder, Wonderful WOrld.
Chuck
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:55 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
I think I mis-spoke
I think I mis-spoke. It doesn't return an array of faults. If the
relationship itself is a fault, simply calling products() without
the .toArray() in a for loop returns a fault and trying to iterate
over it doesn't work.
At least this was the case in 5.3. I haven't tested it in 5.4.
See th
On Mar 17, 2008, at 9:46 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it comes
to source control ?
For years, I just swore at them.
I've done a bit of that too!
The best practice is probably to migrate your project structure to
the Fluffy Bunny Layout
On Mar 17, 2008, at 3:41 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Hi all,
I find myself often times needing to iterate through an NSArray of
EOs. I'm not sure if the way I'm doing it is the most effecient or
not. Here's what I normally do:
public void doThisForAllProducts(EOEditingContext ec) {
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it comes
to source control ?
For years, I just swore at them.
I've done a bit of that too!
The best practice is probably to migrate your project structure to
the Fluffy Bunny Layout (I really should make a Wiki page for that)
and h
On Mar 17, 2008, at 7:15 AM, Fabrice Pipart wrote:
Hi !
I am sure this question has already been asked. But I looked in the
mailing list archives, in wiki books and in project wonder and could
not find any solution to a problem that should be... simple.
I have two entities Source and Dest
Filed.
Problem ID: 5802594
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Hi all,
I just spent about 3 hours trying to track down an error I had in a
EOQualifier.qualifierWithFormat(String format, NSArray args) call:
I was using is
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
Or if you’re not using Wonder stick to the matching qualifiers:
EOKeyValueQualifier, EOAndQualifier, EOOrQualifier...
Forget that there is something like qualifierWithFormat. It is
considered evil and only lures the lazy ones into the pit o
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
Hi All -
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it comes to
source control ?
For years, I just swore at them.
We've got some projects where all the woproject files are under
source control, and others have only some of
Hi All -
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it comes to
source control ?
We've got some projects where all the woproject files are under source
control, and others have only some of them.
I can't remember the specifics as to why we excluded some files in the
past,
Or if you’re not using Wonder stick to the matching qualifiers:
EOKeyValueQualifier, EOAndQualifier, EOOrQualifier...
Forget that there is something like qualifierWithFormat. It is
considered evil and only lures the lazy ones into the pit of the
queasy qualifier beast of traal!
atze
"part = %@ and lotCodeValue = %@ amd manufacturingSchedule = %@"
This is why I build qualifiers with code. In particular, with ERXKey,
this would be:
EOQualifier qualifier =
Item
.PART
.is
(part
).and
(Item
.LOT_CODE_VALUE
.is(lotCodeValue)).and(Item.MANUFACTURING_SCHEDULE.is(schedul
On Mar 17, 2008, at 8:07 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Hi all,
I just spent about 3 hours trying to track down an error I had in a
EOQualifier.qualifierWithFormat(String format, NSArray args) call:
I was using is String:
"part = %@ and lotCodeValue = %@ amd manufacturingSchedule = %@"
Note
Hi all,
I just spent about 3 hours trying to track down an error I had in a
EOQualifier.qualifierWithFormat(String format, NSArray args) call:
I was using is String:
"part = %@ and lotCodeValue = %@ amd manufacturingSchedule = %@"
Note the second "and" is actually "amd"
This did not genera
Hello, well, I think Im gonna try to do something, that I m guessing
its easy to achieve with WO. I decide to do this to train in a better
way I guess. At school I have to implement Some DAO's to make them
work with an ORM(Hibernate) and MySQL. with a realtional database, its
small but we
Hi !
I am sure this question has already been asked. But I looked in the
mailing list archives, in wiki books and in project wonder and could
not find any solution to a problem that should be... simple.
I have two entities Source and Dest with an optional many to many
relationship between t
Hey David.
Am 17.03.2008 um 11:41 schrieb David Avendasora:
I find myself often times needing to iterate through an NSArray of
EOs. I'm not sure if the way I'm doing it is the most effecient or
not. Here's what I normally do:
public void doThisForAllProducts(EOEditingContext ec) {
Hi all,
I find myself often times needing to iterate through an NSArray of
EOs. I'm not sure if the way I'm doing it is the most effecient or
not. Here's what I normally do:
public void doThisForAllProducts(EOEditingContext ec) {
for (Object aProductObject : products().toArray()) {
Hi All -
I've been tinkering with upgrading to leopard over the weekend. I've
updated one machine, then run the woswitch.sh script so we can
continue developing under 5.3.3. I had to do a bit of build path
jigging to get things working again, but pretty much all our code
still seems to wo
> I feel a lot more confident about using WO for new work now than I ever
> have in the past couple of years.
That's true. After taking the J2EE/Apache round trip I enjoy porgramming
with WO (and WOLips) on NEW projects ;-)
And: "The King is dead, long live the King!" ;-)
Oliver
56 matches
Mail list logo
