On 01/04/2008, at 2:14 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
No -- this is a component action, not a direct action (it has to
have the object being referenced).
Right, overlooked that.
If you want to do it on a direct action, just do a normal
hyperlink with ?personID=person.primaryKey and reload the perso
On Mar 31, 2008, at 6:46 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
The KISS solution: configure the maximum size of a request in
Apache itself, using the LimitRequestBody option in the configuration.
You should find a way to handle nicely the error pages the user
will see when submitting a file too
On 01 Apr 2008, at 00:14, Mike Schrag wrote:
No -- this is a component action, not a direct action (it has to
have the object being referenced).
Right, overlooked that.
If you want to do it on a direct action, just do a normal
hyperlink with ?personID=person.primaryKey and reload the perso
That should just work, so I'm not sure what the problem is there,
offhand ... Not sure what version of WOLips you're using, though.
ms
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:26 PM, Archibald Singleton wrote:
On 01 Apr 2008, at 00:16, Mike Schrag wrote:
filename = "~$currentItem + \".gif\""/>
OGNL doesn't u
On 01 Apr 2008, at 00:16, Mike Schrag wrote:
filename = "~$currentItem + \".gif\""/>
OGNL doesn't use $, it just uses the binding name, so "~$currentItem
+ \".gif\"" is invalid, it should be "~currentItem + '.gif'" (single
tick instead of quote is a lot easier with OGNL, too -- a lot less
e
filename = "~$currentItem + \".gif\""/>
OGNL doesn't use $, it just uses the binding name, so "~$currentItem +
\".gif\"" is invalid, it should be "~currentItem + '.gif'" (single
tick instead of quote is a lot easier with OGNL, too -- a lot less
escaping).
ms
___
No -- this is a component action, not a direct action (it has to
have the object being referenced).
Right, overlooked that.
If you want to do it on a direct action, just do a normal hyperlink
with ?personID=person.primaryKey and reload the person in the DA.
Yeah, that's what I was doing bu
Hello,
I've got the following subcomponent in my Main component for which
WOLips is giving me a "There is no key $currentItem in Main" error
message.
= "~$currentItem + \".gif\""/>
The problem is that the key does exist (private ivar with vanilla
accessor methods) and in fact WOLips doe
On 31 Mar 2008, at 23:51, Mike Schrag wrote:
No -- this is a component action, not a direct action (it has to
have the object being referenced).
Right, overlooked that.
If you want to do it on a direct action, just do a normal hyperlink
with ?personID=person.primaryKey and reload the per
No -- this is a component action, not a direct action (it has to have
the object being referenced). If you want to do it on a direct
action, just do a normal hyperlink with ?personID=person.primaryKey
and reload the person in the DA.
ms
On Mar 31, 2008, at 10:49 PM, Archibald Singleton wr
Is this supposed to work with a direct action?
E.g.:
"$person">edit person
I'm asking because I tried it and the person binding just yield and
entree attribute for the tag.
Looking at the implementation of ERXDataHyperlink I don't seem to see
any reason why it wouldn't work.
So, what am
Hi!
The KISS solution: configure the maximum size of a request in
Apache itself, using the LimitRequestBody option in the configuration.
You should find a way to handle nicely the error pages the user
will see when submitting a file too large. This of course depends on
your setup, if
Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone has any recommendations on what to use to
limit the size of files uses upload.
Im currently looking at http://swfupload.org/. has anyone had any
experience with it, in particular getting it to play nice with a WOApp ?
Or is there something better out there ?
Hello -
I am a bit baffled. I have a construct like catalog().products().
When it tries to fault in products it gives me an error stating that
Catalog
doesn't like having "publish" set. Of course not because that
attribute is
only in product.
Then on one of my searches it tells me that par
On Mar 31, 2008, at 3:35 PM, David Holt wrote:
I am attempting to decode the following return from a website and I
am OH SO CLOSE :-)
This is the xml:
2
18326189 18061844
I am trying to get the list of IDs, but I can only get it as far as
the array "IdList". In my HTML component, I
I am attempting to decode the following return from a website and I
am OH SO CLOSE :-)
This is the xml:
2
18326189
18061844
I am trying to get the list of IDs, but I can only get it as far as
the array "IdList". In my HTML compone
It took us a long time to figure this out. It was indeed caused by improper
locking in our app. We don't use Project Wonder, but we did use the
LockScreamingEditingContext to help us find the problem. That helped a bunch
- another useful gem from Practical WebObjects!!!
Dov Rosenberg
On 3/31/08
On Mar 31, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
That has been our experience - no warning just a sudden shutdown of
the app.
When deployed out as a servlet the behavior is such that any other app
including tomcat still responds but the WO app is effectively dead.
That is a locking defect
That has been our experience - no warning just a sudden shutdown of the app.
When deployed out as a servlet the behavior is such that any other app
including tomcat still responds but the WO app is effectively dead.
Thanks
Dov Rosenberg
On 3/31/08 5:25 PM, "Chuck Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
EOF is single threaded at this level. So the threads just wait for
the lock. If you have mis-matched locks (e.g. lock the db context but
never unlock it), the app just deadlocks. No timeout, no exception.
Just a warm, fuzzy deadlock. try... finally is your friend.
Chuck
On Mar 31, 2
Is there a queue where requests get stored in or some sort of timeout
waiting for the lock to release? Or is the failure an outright exception?
Dov Rosenberg
On 3/31/08 4:25 PM, "Chuck Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 31, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
>
>> I guess the real
On 31-Mar-08, at 5:00 PM, Yury Peskin wrote:
List,
I keep getting an error that a DirectAction method does not exist,
but only on the production server.
But I can get to it when I call it from my development machine.
Anybody got any ideas?
The URL you are calling is wrong?
;david
--
Davi
On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:12 PM, Francois Bientz wrote:
Should the EO (Derby) examples work for WO5.4.1 ?
I was able to get the ThinkMovies example to work, but it wasn't
straightforward. The example project build paths and jar dependencies
were incorrect. The name of the Derby bin directo
Please disregard this.
I already figured it out.
Thanks again,
Yury
-Original Message-
From: Yury Peskin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 4:01 PM
To: 'WebObjects Development'
Subject: DirectAction problem
List,
I keep getting an error that a DirectAction method doe
List,
I keep getting an error that a DirectAction method does not exist, but only on
the production server.
But I can get to it when I call it from my development machine.
Anybody got any ideas?
Thanks,
Yury
___
Do not post admin requests to the list.
On Mar 31, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
I guess the real problem is trying to run multithreaded apps against a
single threaded EOF stack. Unless we start using multiple EOF stacks
we
could potentially have other performance problems lurking in the
shadows
More likely from slow f
I guess the real problem is trying to run multithreaded apps against a
single threaded EOF stack. Unless we start using multiple EOF stacks we
could potentially have other performance problems lurking in the shadows
Thanks
Dov Rosenberg
On 3/31/08 3:39 PM, "Chuck Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
That is how you lock the EOF stack. While the stack is locked, no
other thread can fetch / save. This same lock happens during all
fetch or save operations.
Chuck
On Mar 31, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
Taking a look at the new code – I agree it looks a bit safer than
the old
Taking a look at the new code I agree it looks a bit safer than the old
code. What is the implication for doing an EODatabaseContext lock in a multi
threaded app? Will that cause any problems if multiple sessions are trying
to do something similar concurrently?
Dov Rosenberg
On 3/30/08 5:56 PM
On Mar 31, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
I haven't tried the new single file format style tags, but old style
tags don't seem to confuse Coda, from Panic. Of course,
it doesn't look in the .wod file to figure out if things are FORM/
INPUT, etc., but nothing has done that sin
I haven't tried the new single file format style tags, but old style
tags don't seem to confuse Coda, from Panic. Of course, it
doesn't look in the .wod file to figure out if things are FORM/INPUT,
etc., but nothing has done that since GoLive.
Useful if you're tweaking static HTML/CSS
Ha! Is there anything Wonder can't do? I knew there had to be something
there already !!!
Extra Very Elegant.
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Mike Schrag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In Wonder, ERXDataHyperlink --
> edit
> person
>
> You can pass in multiple variables, as well ...
>
> ms
>
> On
In Wonder, ERXDataHyperlink --
"$person">edit person
You can pass in multiple variables, as well ...
ms
On Mar 31, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Chris Meyer wrote:
> Code comment: Ooo ick - using public ivars in your api! - wrap that
> person with accessors!
If I'm lazy enough to want to avoid writin
WOWODC, our annual WebObjects conference, is being held on June 7th
and 8th 2008, the weekend before WWDC, at the Parc 55 Hotel in San
Franscico. Join us for two days of learning and discussion hosted by
the WebObjects community's leading experts!
When: June 7th and June 8th.
Where: Parc 5
Should the EO (Derby) examples work for WO5.4.1 ?
But what must be written in this properties file and where put this file ?
Thanks
franc
---
Re: derby examples
Tom Pelaia
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:08:39 -0800
Thanks for the feedback.
You are correct. The part that I was missing was that I needed to s
35 matches
Mail list logo
