Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 17.05.2008, at 18:40, Chuck Hill wrote: HEY! It's weekend, it's 29 degrees and even sunny in Vancouver. Go, grab a beer, grill a steak and hug your wife! That's what I'm going to do now (No, I'll hug MY wife!). I think that Nok will be disappointed. And as I don't want that, I'll inclu

Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Don Lindsay
Hello; I tried Netbeans and Visual Web on a test project. The interface in Netbeans is very tweaky and crashes constantly. I never made it though the whole project befroe I threw my hands in the air. WebObjects is more mature faster and less of a resource hog in my experience. Don On

Re: ALCATRAZ! (Was: [OT] WOWODC Outing)

2008-05-17 Thread Daniel Beatty
Greetings David and the gang, I will also be in San Francisco at that time, bound for WOWODC, and would like to join either party (Alcatraz or this Chieftan as some one was calling.)I am probably be one of the few student types asking, but I have been told asking doesn't hurt.May I j

Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Schrag
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI and self coding features. Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips I'm not sure what you're looking to compare -- WO + Eclipse/WOLips to JSF + NetBeans or just the IDE features of Eclipse/WOLips to the IDE feature

Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Chuck Hill
On May 17, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote: On 17.05.2008, at 18:22, Chuck Hill wrote: On May 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Ken Foust wrote: This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI and self coding features. Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips W

Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 17.05.2008, at 18:22, Chuck Hill wrote: On May 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Ken Foust wrote: This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI and self coding features. Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips WOLips support WebObjects. NetBeans supports shite. Yo

Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Chuck Hill
On May 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Ken Foust wrote: This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI and self coding features. Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips WOLips support WebObjects. NetBeans supports shite. Your choice. Chuck -- Practical WebObjects

Re: Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Guido Neitzer
On 17.05.2008, at 16:47, Ken Foust wrote: This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI and self coding features. Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips Why? You really think a Java Beans / JSF environment will become a WO replacement for people here? Ugh

Netbeans 6.1 visual web

2008-05-17 Thread Ken Foust
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI and self coding features. Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips thanks ken ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list

Classpath differences in Dev. vs. Deployment

2008-05-17 Thread Serge Cohen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi; Is there a way to make sure that the "classpath" used when the application is started within Eclipse (with WOLips) is EXACTLY the same as the one resulting of the launch by JavaMonitor (corresponding to the Contents/MacOS/MacOSClassPath.txt