Hello;
I can't 100% remember what the case in WO 5.3.3 was and I could be
wrong, but has anybody else had 5.4.X problems with running a fetch
specification like this;
( com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOFetchSpecification(entityName=XYZAdminUser,
qualifier=((id = 22)),
On Sep 23, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Sergio Sánchez Maffet wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed a failure in the handling of prefetched flattened
relationships using WONDER (latest) with WO 5.4.3
In general, I would describe pre-fetching as buggy. It works in
simple cases, but gets confused if you go
Hi all,
I have noticed a failure in the handling of prefetched flattened
relationships using WONDER (latest) with WO 5.4.3
Model:
My1Entity (class My1Entity)
To one relationships: my3entity destination My3Entity
To many relationships: my2entities (flattened relationship)
destination My2Enti
Whatever gave you that idea? The CNF imps have nothing much todo with
the RNF imps...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 23.09.2008 um 12:06 schrieb John Bruce:
I looked at
the Wonder default and jGroups implementations of remote
notifications, but
I believe that they have the goal of sync'ing models, which
On Sep 23, 2008, at 05:19, Jaime Magiera wrote:
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:28 PM, David den Boer wrote:
But never forget that all the 'important' (IMHO) code runs on WO,
and that is what matters for the long run.
What exactly does that do to encourage a development base?
Assuming it is true,
Hi Gavin,
I've also used Shoal ( https://shoal.dev.java.net/ ) which is a Java
library for group communication. It uses JXTA by default but can also
use JGroups. I have used it as a replacement for JGroups EOF syncing
but you can also easily use it for sending notifications to members of
the group
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:28 PM, David den Boer wrote:
But never forget that all the 'important' (IMHO) code runs on WO,
and that is what matters for the long run.
What exactly does that do to encourage a development base?
Jaime Magiera
Sensory Research
http://www.sensoryresearch.net
_
