A chance to show off WO

2008-11-14 Thread David Holt
I have just heard about this new Apache Incubator project called Olio designed to compare and contrast php ror and java as web app development platforms. They are encouraging other platforms to have a go...From their wiki: ===Welcome to OlioOlio is a is a web2.0 toolkit to help evaluate the suitabi

Re: Problems with a fetch

2008-11-14 Thread Pascal Robert
Well, like Miguel said, I should use Examen.ENTITY_NAME, not Examen.class.getName(), who will return the full name with the package... I'm stumped on this one. I have a call to objectsWithFetchSpecification() who is telling me : [2008-11-14 14:46:09 EST] java.lang.IllegalArgumentExcep

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Ken Anderson
On Nov 14, 2008, at 2:55 PM, Timothy Reaves wrote: On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:53 AM, David LeBer wrote: On 14-Nov-08, at 9:35 AM, Timothy Reaves wrote: I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal, and things lik

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Timothy Reaves
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:53 AM, David LeBer wrote: On 14-Nov-08, at 9:35 AM, Timothy Reaves wrote: I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal, and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have is th

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Timothy Reaves
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:54 AM, David Avendasora wrote: They deprecated *their* version of the dev tools because Eclipse/ WOLips was so much better than what they had. Apple uses WOLips internally. Apple runs their entire business on WO. They aren't going to release new dev tools. You'll just

Problems with a fetch

2008-11-14 Thread Pascal Robert
I'm stumped on this one. I have a call to objectsWithFetchSpecification() who is telling me : [2008-11-14 14:46:09 EST] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An object store for the entity "com.acaiq.fondation.acaiqForm.Examen" could not be found. Verify that the entity is defined in an

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Robert Walker
a) Leopard deprecated the Java-ObjC bridge support making the legacy tools fail to function properly without this support being reimplemented somehow. b) The legacy tools were well overdue for a rewrite c) Eclipse + WOLips had gained substantial traction internally and within the WO communit

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread James Cicenia
Hello - I just wanted to say that it does age gracefully and seems to also be nicely secure. I have taken on a couple of legacy apps, which have "just been running" seemingly forever without security notices, crashes, etc. While the layout of the projects has changed when I moved them to th

How to pass NSData object to a DA from a form submit?

2008-11-14 Thread William Hatch
I'm creating a testing component that can simulate a POST request to one of the app's DA's. The DA currently works no problem, I just need to simulate what the client does when it makes a request to this action within a test app that's in wo; that way we can mess around with parameters, etc

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Q
On 15/11/2008, at 12:35 AM, Timothy Reaves wrote: I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal, and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have is that one of the developers has pointed out that Ap

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Gustavo Pizano
On Nov 14, 2008, at 3:59 PM, David Avendasora wrote: On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Simon McLean wrote: it runs the itunes music store it runs me.com it runs the jesusphone app store That's iPhone, not jes... wait. Given: iPhone = jesusphone Therefore: i = jesus Therefore: I AM Jesus LOL

Re: Moving over an app to Linux and I get this error..

2008-11-14 Thread James Cicenia
I was referring to it. I don't know if it was or wasn't but it was good enough for me coupled with an embed deployment. So, I couldn't have picked a better time for this project. And I actually am over my Linux / WO fear now too! Of all the lists I belong to, this list rocks them all. Fro

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Kieran Kelleher
After all, it is only java and text files so the fact that the standard development IDE *is* the very common and widely used Eclipse rather than a small user population proprietary IDE is *better* than the situation where Apple provides their own tools. ... building is accomplished wit

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread David Avendasora
On Nov 14, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Simon McLean wrote: it runs the itunes music store it runs me.com it runs the jesusphone app store That's iPhone, not jes... wait. Given: iPhone = jesusphone Therefore: i = jesus Therefore: I AM Jesus Finally, proof. My must go tell my wife. Dave it runs th

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread David LeBer
On 14-Nov-08, at 9:35 AM, Timothy Reaves wrote: I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal, and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have is that one of the developers has pointed out that Apple

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread David Avendasora
They deprecated *their* version of the dev tools because Eclipse/ WOLips was so much better than what they had. Apple uses WOLips internally. Apple runs their entire business on WO. They aren't going to release new dev tools. You'll just have to make due with the dev environment that at leas

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Pascal Robert
We hope we can get you on board :-) To answer your question : 1) The community is doing much better than in the past. We have WOWODC, our annual WO conference, the WO Community Web site, really good open source frameworks and more people in the mailing lists. 2) Apple dropped the old dev t

Re: Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Simon McLean
it runs the itunes music store it runs me.com it runs the jesusphone app store it runs the apple store i get the feeling they are pretty committed to it. Simon On 14 Nov 2008, at 14:35, Timothy Reaves wrote: I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our proprietary dev stack and

Pushing for WebObjects?

2008-11-14 Thread Timothy Reaves
I'm trying to convince our development staff to drop our proprietary dev stack and adopt WebObjects. I like WO a good deal, and things like Project WOnder help too. The problem I have is that one of the developers has pointed out that Apple has deprecated the development tools. You can'

Re: Debugging Frameworks in Eclipse

2008-11-14 Thread Mersida Kurti
Hi cug, Not sure what you mean by "link to a version".  Can you please explain it to me? Thank you, Mersida --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Guido Neitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Guido Neitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Debugging Frameworks in Eclipse To: "WebObjects Dev" Date: Thursday, Nov

Re: Debugging Frameworks in Eclipse

2008-11-14 Thread Mersida Kurti
Hi, I've downloaded the all in one installer at this page: http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Installing+WOLips For wolips version it says stable rev, so I'm guessing that's not the nightly build.  Should I install that instead? Thanks, Mersida --- On Thu, 11/13/08, Mike Schra

"Powered by WO" on an apple site

2008-11-14 Thread Florijan Stamenkovic
https://appleseed.apple.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/SeedPortal Maybe it's just me, but I've never seen a "Powered by WO" banner/tag/ whatever on any other Apple site. Interesting... F ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webob

Re: deployment problem

2008-11-14 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi Harvey, M.Y. Tjoe wrote: maven-war-plugin 2.0 true It seems that you have the maven-war-plugin correctly configured. Any reasons to use the version 2.0 of this plug-in instead of the latest (2.1-alpha-2)? Probably the "archiveClasses" option is

Re: deployment problem --> maven + war

2008-11-14 Thread Henrique Prange
Hi Harvey, M.Y. Tjoe wrote: I got the feeling it should probably the same as ant generated war, anyone can confirm if this is the case? No. The general maven-war-plugin is used to generate the package. I think the Ant task generates SSDD (Servlet Single Directory Deployment) wars. I don'