Hello Quinton and Lachlan;
Thanks for the work-around. Strangely this seems to fix the problem
on my real project, but not on my experiment project (as per email).
In any case, the outcome is good. I am wondering though, is this a
problem caused by WebObjects or wolips?
cheers
Try add
Hi folks,
when redirecting to a WOLongResponsePage in 'appendToResponse' by using
the WOResponses 'setContend' method (as shown below), the
WOLongResponsePage does not work properly. The page is shown indeed and
'performAction' is called once (by the WOLongResponse mechanism), but
the page does n
Try adding the WOJavaRebel framework that I just added to Wonder to
your classpath (before JavaWebObjects.framework). It has a version of
_IDEProjectWOLips that should fix the problem.
On 26/11/2008, at 3:59 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
On 26/11/2008, at 1:21 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello;
On 26/11/2008, at 1:21 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello;
I've filed a radar #6401984. Unfortunately this looks like a bug in
WebObjects 5.4.3 which applies to users of "jar frameworks" (not for
Chucks or Mikes). The bug manifests itself when you reference a
WebServerResource/.. in that
Anjo,
No, I haven't looked at CouchDB until now (on Wikipedia).
The limits you mentioned on SimpleDB are interesting:
http://ad.vu/9vg
If I'm reading the 250M attribute name-value pair limit correctly,
that means a domain (table) with 10 attributes (columns) could only
hold
Hello;
I've filed a radar #6401984. Unfortunately this looks like a bug in
WebObjects 5.4.3 which applies to users of "jar frameworks" (not for
Chucks or Mikes). The bug manifests itself when you reference a
WebServerResource/.. in that it creates broken URLs which the "wr"
request hand
Hello Mike;
I wonder if the "new hotness" is worth a shot given that all of the
bundles report their "bundle.bundlePathURL()" like this on WO 5.4.3...
file:/Library/WebObjects/lib-5.4.3/JavaFoundation.jar
...and like this for WO 5.4.2...
file:/Library/WebObjects/lib-5.4.2/Ja
Chuck:
> You have bad (broken, invalid, call it what you want) in your application
somewhere.
> Override dispatchRequest in Application and log out each incoming
request.uri().
Thanks for the suggestion. Did that and didn't find anything unusual in the
log. Things were getting a bit ugly - so
Has anybody else had this problem?
I'd try the New Hotness. This sounds like an issue with the WO
Launcher and I think that is all different now in New Hotness. That
said, few people use jar frameworks (Mike is a notorious unbeliever
as am I) so the chance of finding bugs is high.
However,
Am 25.11.2008 um 23:37 schrieb Joe Moreno:
- ever used anything that is not a RDMS? Like SimpleDB or CouchDB?
One would think that the REST adaptor in Wonder might help here
I've been backing up some historical data that doesn't change to
SimpleDB. It doesn't seem like the pricing is bad at
On Nov 25, 2008, at 1:16 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hello;
After upgrading a developer to 5.4.3, the WOA seems to no longer be
able to access resources sourced from a jar-Framework in the
development environment -- Eclipse sans the new Hotness. The
abbreviated URL it creates to get the
Anjo,
- ever used anything that is not a RDMS? Like SimpleDB or CouchDB?
One would think that the REST adaptor in Wonder might help here
I've been backing up some historical data that doesn't change to
SimpleDB. It doesn't seem like the pricing is bad at all - I've put
more than a million r
Yes just in development –– the deployment builds are working fine. My
environment is also fine because I am working with the framework
source so there is no "jar" framework.
cheers.
After upgrading a developer to 5.4.3, the WOA seems to no longer be
able to access resources sourced from a
On 26/11/2008, at 8:16 AM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
After upgrading a developer to 5.4.3, the WOA seems to no longer be
able to access resources sourced from a jar-Framework in the
development environment -- Eclipse sans the new Hotness. The
abbreviated URL it creates to get the WebServerRes
Hello;
After upgrading a developer to 5.4.3, the WOA seems to no longer be
able to access resources sourced from a jar-Framework in the
development environment -- Eclipse sans the new Hotness. The
abbreviated URL it creates to get the WebServerResource looks like this;
/Project/build/Fo
All that is needed is the binary version of the Wonder frameworks. You do
not need to build the Wonder frameworks (from source) to get AjaxExample2 to
work.
--JSt
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ricardo J. Parada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I ran it from the command line because I couldn't
Thank you, I have it working now.
In regards to your example found here:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:WebObjects/Web_Applications/Deployment/Apache
That's very cool the way you pulled out the instance number and
appended it as one of the get variables. Did you accomplish that by
Hi,
I'm currently investigating EC2 as a viable means to deploy WO apps.
Previous discussion has been here:
http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-deploy/2008/Apr/msg00050.html
I found some maven tools here:
http://code.google.com/p/cloudtools/
and there is also support for capistrano
I ran it from the command line because I couldn't figure out how to
build Wonder from within Eclipse. :-) Not sure what I did wrong. I
was expecting it to build from Eclipse+WOLips Nightly.
Anyways, you said you imported (and copy) AjaxExample2 into your
workspace? How about the Wonde
Ricardo:
> Were you able to run AjaxExample2 successfully?
Yes. Started from square one. I ended up deleting all references to it (in
Eclipse) and then re-imported the project to make a local copy in my
workspace. That solved the problem. Of course, I am running in Eclipse.
Haven't done an ant
On Oct 12, 2008, at 8:06 PM, J Stephanos wrote:
When I try to run AjaxExample2, I get this error:
AjaxExample2
Error:
com.webobjects.appserver.parser.woml.WOMLTemplateParserException:
AjaxHeaderFooter: 3:36: wo:str {null={value=$^title}} has no WOElement
Reason: wo:str {null={value=$^titl
Am 25.11.2008 um 19:55 schrieb Guido Neitzer:
setIncludeCommentsInResponses(true) in your application.
How utterly WO-like... why not create a IncludeConditional component/
element that outputs these comments?
Cheers, Anjo
cug
On 25.11.2008, at 11:52, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Hi all,
On 25.11.2008, at 12:09, Miguel Arroz wrote:
It won't solve the problem. Those [if IE] style comments get
corrupt by some weird reason (even with includeCommentsInResponses
set to true). Perhaps we should file a bug on this... :P
I remember that from a long time ago and I thought I had fil
I had an issue with that, too - it was eating one of the > or
something. Can't remember that completely.
Why do you want to file a bug exactly?
cug
On 25.11.2008, at 12:07, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Ahh, so it is WO eating them. I didn't think it was WOLips because
the comments were in th
Hi!
It won't solve the problem. Those [if IE] style comments get
corrupt by some weird reason (even with includeCommentsInResponses set
to true). Perhaps we should file a bug on this... :P
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2008/11/25, at 18:55, Guido Neitzer wrote:
setIncludeCommentsInResponses
Ahh, so it is WO eating them. I didn't think it was WOLips because
the comments were in the build folder. I should probably file a bug
with Apple regarding that trailing endif then...
Thanks for point out the source of the issue Guido!
Ramsey
On Nov 25, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Guido Neitzer wr
I was just thinking the same thing. I think I'll go one step further
though and do an ERXIEConditional for Project Wonder (^_^)
On Nov 25, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
We also hit that problem. We solved it by using an WOString to
insert those comments (with HTML escaping tu
setIncludeCommentsInResponses(true) in your application.
cug
On 25.11.2008, at 11:52, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to do something using IE's conditional comments (http://juicystudio.com/article/object-paranoia.php
) and what starts as
Comes out on the page lookin
Hi!
We also hit that problem. We solved it by using an WOString to
insert those comments (with HTML escaping turned off, I think, but not
sure).
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2008/11/25, at 18:52, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to do something using IE's conditional comments (
QUESTIONS:
Should we use manual locking/unlocking inside the thread?
Should we even bother to use ERXEC inside the thread? Maybe just use
the original WO EOEditingContext
Is this error causing us any problems? Should we ignore it? How can
we configure Wonder or Log4j properties to mask the err
Hi all,
I'm trying to do something using IE's conditional comments (http://juicystudio.com/article/object-paranoia.php
) and what starts as
Comes out on the page looking like:
We converted our app over to Project Wonder to get past some issues we were
having with it locking up under load. For the most part the switch seems to
have been successful we were able to run under a sizable load for
24+hours.
Looking thru the logs however I found some errors like the following
On Nov 25, 2008, at 3:47 AM, Geoff Hopson wrote:
Hi,
I have a screen that requires a fieldset or a field to be able to edit
2 sets of values for the same attribute. If I have a 'name' attribute,
I might want a public facing value to be 'Fred', but I might want an
internal version to be 'Agent
I agree. Something like Alfresco might do the job. IIRC, they have
both REST and SOAP APIs, and it's written in Java.
Yeah well. Kinda. But you'd want rules and stored state and stuff
and you might really be better of by re-using one of the existing
engines before rolling your own and re-i
On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Michael DeMan (WO) wrote:
The cool thing about thinking about it is a finite state engine is
that the technical stuff is so thoroughly documented. Plus,
visualizing it is easier. A bunch of circles on a piece of paper
with arrows coming in from other circles
Hi,
I have a screen that requires a fieldset or a field to be able to edit
2 sets of values for the same attribute. If I have a 'name' attribute,
I might want a public facing value to be 'Fred', but I might want an
internal version to be 'Agent X'. The idea is that, given a suitable
boolean flag (
Yeah well. Kinda. But you'd want rules and stored state and stuff and
you might really be better of by re-using one of the existing engines
before rolling your own and re-implementing the whole thing...
Cheers, Anjo
Am 25.11.2008 um 00:32 schrieb Michael DeMan (WO):
It has occurred to me
37 matches
Mail list logo
