On 16/05/2009, at 12:07 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
I'm not sure this is really any better ... Fundamentally there's a ?
in that param, and as a result, it's impossible to do a put in a
typesafe way. You don't know what V is. I _think_ the signature as
it is now is actually correct, but if you
Am 16.05.2009 um 01:29 schrieb Mike Schrag:
Map< String, List< String >> correctHeaders = new HashMap< String,
List< String > >();
btw, this is what i was saying that the only typesafe way to do this
is to copy the original headers -- so you would do new
HashMap>(originalHeaders) and then
The Oracle 9i drivers are no longer supported or patched.Oracle
Support advises everyone to use the latest drivers, they are 100%
backwards compatible (wry smile). For Java 1.5 use the OJDBC5.jar
from 11i. For Java 1.6 use OJDBC6.jar. For java 1.4 use OJDBC14.jar,
for java earlier th
Thanks for letting us know. Works great. Very clean decompile. It is
cool how it puts /* */ the the left of every
code line too.
btw, you can do this with jad, too, with the -lnc option (there's a
setting in jadclipse for it too) ...
ms
___
Do
Did you guys have to remove jadclipse ? Is there a conflict if one
has jadclipse already installed?
:-)
On May 15, 2009, at 10:15 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
Thanks for letting us know. Works great. Very clean decompile. It is
cool how it puts /* */ the the left of every
code line too.
I'm not sure this is really any better ... Fundamentally there's a ?
in that param, and as a result, it's impossible to do a put in a
typesafe way. You don't know what V is. I _think_ the signature as it
is now is actually correct, but if you need to insert into that map
inside createReque
Thanks for letting us know. Works great. Very clean decompile. It is
cool how it puts /* */ the the left of every
code line too.
On May 15, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Henrique Prange wrote:
Hi list,
Just to inform the Java Decompiler [1] plug-in for Eclipse is now
available for Mac OS X. I hav
Hi Mike,
The following solution doesn't solve the unchecked type cast problem.
But it respect PECS definition and accept a MapNSArray> as parameter. Do you think it is reasonable?
public > WORequest treateRequest(String
method, String url, String anHTTPVersion, Map
someHeaders, NSData co
On 16/05/2009, at 10:03 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Generics are great mostly - but there are times when it's just
downright annoying :-).
Sounds like Maven!
:-P
Touché ;-)
But still lovin' your work as the unlikely ambassador, finding every
On May 15, 2009, at 4:59 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
Generics are great mostly - but there are times when it's just
downright annoying :-).
Sounds like Maven!
:-P
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Come to WOWODC'09 in San Fran this June!
http://www.wocommunity.org
On 16/05/2009, at 9:27 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
public WORequest createRequest( String method,
String aurl,
String anHttpVersion,
Map< String, ? extends List< String
>> someHeaders,
Works fine in Leopard, so I would guess it's a Tiger vs. Leopard issue.
David
On 15-May-09, at 2:24 PM, David Holt wrote:
Does it work with Tiger? I can't get any classes to load. JD-GUI
doesn't work with Tiger as far as I can tell, so it might be the
same issue.
David
On 15-May-09, at 1
Map< String, List< String >> correctHeaders = new HashMap< String,
List< String > >();
btw, this is what i was saying that the only typesafe way to do this
is to copy the original headers -- so you would do new HashMapList>(originalHeaders) and then you'd have a properly typesafe
> that you
public WORequest createRequest( String method,
String aurl,
String anHttpVersion,
Map< String, ? extends List< String
>> someHeaders,
NSData content,
On 15/05/2009, at 10:48 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Yeah this is a tricky one ... But you're right that the API is "?
extends List" so you can pass in NSArray, which is a
pretty common implementation. You also can't necessarily just
assume people can declare their vars as List instead of
NSAr
On 16/05/2009, at 6:51 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Henrique Prange wrote:
Hi list,
Just to inform the Java Decompiler [1] plug-in for Eclipse is now
available for Mac OS X. I have tried and it seems pretty good.
[1]http://java.decompiler.free.fr/
Bye bye Jadc
Does it work with Tiger? I can't get any classes to load. JD-GUI
doesn't work with Tiger as far as I can tell, so it might be the same
issue.
David
On 15-May-09, at 1:51 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 15, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Henrique Prange wrote:
Hi list,
Just to inform the Java Decompi
On May 15, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Henrique Prange wrote:
Hi list,
Just to inform the Java Decompiler [1] plug-in for Eclipse is now
available for Mac OS X. I have tried and it seems pretty good.
[1]http://java.decompiler.free.fr/
Bye bye Jadclipse!
Thanks for the heads up.
Chuck
--
Ch
EOF can change the order that these are sent to the database. Is
there any chance that the order that is causing the error is not the
order you show in your message?
Chuck
On May 15, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
Sorry, it's really not that confusing
OrderHeader
->> OrderDeta
Sorry, it's really not that confusing
OrderHeader
->> OrderDetailSales
-> OrderDetailCost
The values in the objects are fine, the pk's are fine, the insert order
appears to be fine (OrderHeader then OrderDetailSales then OrderDetailCost)
so the db constraint should be a problem,
On May 15, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
This is a complete shot in the dark, but how does Sybase handle
constraints within one transaction? Would the OrderHeader insert
have to be committed before you can issue an INSERT into a related
table?
As long as it's in the transaction i
>
> This is a complete shot in the dark, but how does Sybase handle constraints
> within one transaction? Would the OrderHeader insert have to be committed
> before you can issue an INSERT into a related table?
>
As long as it's in the transaction it should be okay. I'm wondering if it's
not real
Hi list,
Just to inform the Java Decompiler [1] plug-in for Eclipse is now
available for Mac OS X. I have tried and it seems pretty good.
[1]http://java.decompiler.free.fr/
Cheers,
Henrique
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
This is a complete shot in the dark, but how does Sybase handle
constraints within one transaction? Would the OrderHeader insert have
to be committed before you can issue an INSERT into a related table?
If that's not it, what is the actual order_detlcost_ordhdr constraint?
Is it a compound
I have an object graph that's being saved and it seems okay. I have an
OrderHeader object and an OrderDetailCost object where the foreign key for
OrderDetailCost requires OrderHeader to exist.
Here's the sql (snipped):
May 15 10:05:00 DataBuilder[2500] DEBUG NSLog - === Begin Internal
Transact
Oh my! You're right Looks like I've got my work cut out for
me today...
On May 15, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
I suggest you check the source code of your front page, Safari is
right.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:31, John Ours wrote:
OK, totally off topic and a shot in
I suggest you check the source code of your front page, Safari is right.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:31, John Ours wrote:
> OK, totally off topic and a shot in the dark, but I figured I'd ask some of
> the most knowledgeable people I know...
>
> One of my sites (non-WO) is throwing a "Malicious Si
well, no matter what you do, i think you're going to throw out type
safety, so inside the method, you could just cast the headers to
> :
Map> badCast = (MapList>)headers;
badCast.put("a", new LinkedList());
ms
On May 15, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Jim Kinsey wrote:
Hi Andrew,
what the ca
Hi Andrew,
what the calling method ought to be doing though is declaring the
list it passes as Map> and hiding the concrete
List implementation, negating the need for the wildcard.
I tried it with a concrete implementation of List as well, but this
also raised an error in a similar fashio
Yeah this is a tricky one ... But you're right that the API is "?
extends List" so you can pass in NSArray, which is a
pretty common implementation. You also can't necessarily just assume
people can declare their vars as List instead of
NSArray because you don't know where that var came fr
Hello Jim;
Thanks for the reply.
what the calling method ought to be doing though is declaring the
list it passes as Map> and hiding the concrete
List implementation, negating the need for the wildcard.
I tried it with a concrete implementation of List as well, but this
also raised an er
Hi Andrew,
I find it odd that the map should have ? extends List as a
parameter as the extension ought to be unnecessary (assuming callers
are working to the List interface) - any List implementation with a
String parameter fulfills List. I like generics too, but have
come across similarl
32 matches
Mail list logo
