Hi Paul;
Chuck's advice is good for your situation. You may find later there
is some merit in deploying a messaging-broker for other things in
which case that approach may be better at that point in time. I
control large areas of functionality in a multi-instance system using
messaging
On 22/07/2009, at 1:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
This works fine, _except_ that the state needs to persist across
scheduled re-starts. I will look at storing the state in the
database instead.
Restarts and multiple instances, no? Otherwise they would need to
login to each instance.
Ah, th
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:38 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
On 22/07/2009, at 12:41 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi Chuck;
Wouldn't it just be one trip at startup?
Ah I thought he was going to check the state of the "property"
each time somebody attem
On 22/07/2009, at 12:41 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi Chuck;
Wouldn't it just be one trip at startup?
Ah I thought he was going to check the state of the "property" each
time somebody attempts to logs on so he could turn login on and off.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:20 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 21-Jul-09, at 11:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi Chuck;
Wouldn't it just be one trip at startup?
Ah I thought he was going to check the state of the "property"
each time somebody attem
On 21-Jul-09, at 11:11 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi Chuck;
Wouldn't it just be one trip at startup?
Ah I thought he was going to check the state of the "property" each
time somebody attempts to logs on so he could turn login on and off.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:08 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
Hi Chuck;
Wouldn't it just be one trip at startup?
Ah I thought he was going to check the state of the "property" each
time somebody attempts to logs on so he could turn login on and off.
I am not too clear myself on what the requireme
Hi Chuck;
Wouldn't it just be one trip at startup?
Ah I thought he was going to check the state of the "property" each
time somebody attempts to logs on so he could turn login on and off.
http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/07/webobjects-sliced-from-106but-prognosis-of-death-premature.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:58 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 22/07/2009, at 12:24 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
If your deployment is large enough to justify it, you could use a
messaging service (JMS) to message each instance to change the
state? This avoids having to do the extra databa
Hi Andrew,
On 22/07/2009, at 12:24 PM, Andrew Lindesay wrote:
If your deployment is large enough to justify it, you could use a
messaging service (JMS) to message each instance to change the
state? This avoids having to do the extra database trip on each
login but maybe too much complexit
Hi Paul;
If your deployment is large enough to justify it, you could use a
messaging service (JMS) to message each instance to change the state?
This avoids having to do the extra database trip on each login but
maybe too much complexity if you don't have the need for a messaging
broker
On 21/07/2009, at 11:29 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Is a scheduled re-start via JavaMonitor a hard re-start? In
particular, is Properties re-read? (I should be able to answer
this myself in about 8 hours...) Ideally, I want the semantics
here to be "disallow logins on first launch, not again a
HI Miguel,
On Jul 21, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:34 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Miguel,
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
Hi guys,
I am staring a new project and I want to use Wonde
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Miguel,
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
Hi guys,
I am staring a new project and I want to use Wonder and try to
implement Chuck Hill's recommended
On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Cough. Yes. Well. er. The diagram is wrong. Congratulations,
you are the only one to have noticed this! Including me... :-(
CommonPage and CommonComponent should have the same super
On Jul 21, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Cough. Yes. Well. er. The diagram is wrong. Congratulations,
you are the only one to have noticed this! Including me... :-(
CommonPage and CommonComponent should have the same super-class.
You can use ERXComponent for this or subclass
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Miguel,
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
Hi guys,
I am staring a new project and I want to use Wonder and try to
implement Chuck Hill's recommended best practices.
I have watched a lot of times (almost 10 tim
Hi Miguel,
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Miguel Angel Torres Avila wrote:
Hi guys,
I am staring a new project and I want to use Wonder and try to
implement Chuck Hill's recommended best practices.
I have watched a lot of times (almost 10 times) the screencast
http://www.wocommunity.org/pod
On Jul 21, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:59 PM, John Ours wrote:
so what if I get some other type of notification in there? This
appears to be the same call EODistributedObjectStore makes in its
_send routine, and I'd hate to pop a notification that it really
On Jul 21, 2009, at 13:50, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 13:03, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:59 PM, John Ours wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:29 AM, David Avend
On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 13:03, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:59 PM, John Ours wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:29 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Wouldn't calling clientSideReque
On Jul 21, 2009, at 13:03, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:59 PM, John Ours wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:29 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Wouldn't calling clientSideRequestGetNotifications() on the
client trigger an automatic cop
On Jul 20, 2009, at 8:59 PM, John Ours wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:29 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Wouldn't calling clientSideRequestGetNotifications() on the client
trigger an automatic copying of the client-side EditingContext
back to
On Jul 21, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 23:59, John Ours wrote:
Now, my concern is that making this call from the client "pops" the
notification so the server doesn't see it, and for this very
controlled scenario that works fine. But I'd need to cal
Le 09-07-21 à 11:23, Amedeo Mantica a écrit :
Hello Pascal,
As you know, with your help, I'm now able to retreive CalDav events.
Now I need to create an html page for displaying the events in a
beautiful calendar like look.
I have one but it only display the events one after the other, no
Hello Pascal,
As you know, with your help, I'm now able to retreive CalDav events.
Now I need to create an html page for displaying the events in a
beautiful calendar like look.
Do you (and all readers) know if there is already a Wonder Element
that do this??
If not, I'll start today cre
On Jul 20, 2009, at 23:59, John Ours wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:29 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Wouldn't calling clientSideRequestGetNotifications() on the client
trigger an automatic copying of the client-side EditingContext
back to t
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:22 AM, Francesco Romano wrote:
On 21/lug/09, at 16:16, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Francesco Romano wrote:
I want to say that this is the first time I do something dynamic
for the web (like an e-commerce site, or a web app) and it's not
my job..
On Jul 21, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Francesco Romano wrote:
I want to say that this is the first time I do something dynamic for
the web (like an e-commerce site, or a web app) and it's not my
job.. I'm a student and I'm doing a favor to my father...
So... I'm open to every advices, even not relat
Le 09-07-21 à 09:57, Francesco Romano a écrit :
I want to say that this is the first time I do something dynamic for
the web (like an e-commerce site, or a web app) and it's not my
job.. I'm a student and I'm doing a favor to my father...
So... I'm open to every advices, even not related to
On Jul 21, 2009, at 3:19 AM, Francesco Romano wrote:
Thanks to both.
I read that chapter in the Apple documentation.
If I understand correctly the globalID has its scope in the
editingcontext.
No. An EOEnterpriseObject has scope in an EOEditingContext, each is a
unique Java Object. An E
On Jul 21, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
Hello,
I have an app deployed using JavaMonitor. I have a property
'acceptLogins=false' in Properties, which has the effect of
disabling non-superuser logins on startup. When appropriate, a
superuser changes the state of a variable in Ap
On Jul 21, 2009, at 12:56 AM, Francesco Romano wrote:
Hi..
This is a simple (and maybe stupid) question.
No. :-)
I'm doing an application (an e-commerce application.. maybe wo is
not the best choice, but I know java better than ruby..), and I've
some pages accessed with directaction.
M
I want to say that this is the first time I do something dynamic for
the web (like an e-commerce site, or a web app) and it's not my job..
I'm a student and I'm doing a favor to my father...
So... I'm open to every advices, even not related to WO.
Now, my ideas (maybe I've already written thi
On 21 juil. 2009, at 15:19, Francesco Romano wrote:
On 21/lug/09, at 12:43, Christian Trotobas wrote:
On 21 juil. 2009, at 12:19, Francesco Romano wrote:
Thanks to both.
I read that chapter in the Apple documentation.
If I understand correctly the globalID has its scope in the
editingco
On 21/lug/09, at 12:43, Christian Trotobas wrote:
On 21 juil. 2009, at 12:19, Francesco Romano wrote:
Thanks to both.
I read that chapter in the Apple documentation.
If I understand correctly the globalID has its scope in the
editingcontext.
I don't know why but I create a new editing cont
On 21 juil. 2009, at 12:19, Francesco Romano wrote:
Thanks to both.
I read that chapter in the Apple documentation.
If I understand correctly the globalID has its scope in the
editingcontext.
I don't know why but I create a new editing context for each page...
so this is bad. Should I keep
Thanks to both.
I read that chapter in the Apple documentation.
If I understand correctly the globalID has its scope in the
editingcontext.
I don't know why but I create a new editing context for each page...
so this is bad. Should I keep a single editing context? (until a
customer add the f
Hello,
I have an app deployed using JavaMonitor. I have a property
'acceptLogins=false' in Properties, which has the effect of disabling
non-superuser logins on startup. When appropriate, a superuser
changes the state of a variable in Application to allow all logins.
Is a scheduled re-s
Hi Francesco
On 21 juil. 2009, at 09:56, Francesco Romano wrote:
Hi..
This is a simple (and maybe stupid) question.
No question is stupid on this list. Feel free to ask.
I'm doing an application (an e-commerce application.. maybe wo is
not the best choice, but I know java better than ruby.
Hello Francesco;
You can construct an EOGlobalID from the primary key an fault it. I
would generally not advocate using the primary key in this manner as
it may be volatile owing to migration of schema or database product
migration. That concern aside, assuming you have a primary key and
Hi..
This is a simple (and maybe stupid) question.
I'm doing an application (an e-commerce application.. maybe wo is not
the best choice, but I know java better than ruby..), and I've some
pages accessed with directaction.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I can pass values to a page only with the url,
s
Thanks for your suggestion Chuck, but it does not change the behaviour
of the file encoding. By placing it into the main method the correct
file encoding gets listed among the general properties list at startup
but the method Converters.getDefaultEncodingName—in contrast to
Charset.defaultC
44 matches
Mail list logo
