Hello,
This may be completely normal, but I haven't run into it before.
I have a framework with a Resources/Properties file that contains a
particular property, say "foo=bar". I have an app that is dependent
on that framework. In the app's build.properties, it happens that I
have a coinc
What I did was to drop the tables and create tables again with static data,
rather than delete all the objects. This is done all from wo. Isn't this
is the same :)
Hi all,
I am trying to make the life of the person doing our acceptance
testing easier by creating a utility that deletes all t
Hi,
Can you use Migrations to tear down and recreate the database while
unit testing? If so can you please explain how?
Thanks,
Johnny
On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:31 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 2009-10-27, at 9:14 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 5:57 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 2009-
On 2009-10-27, at 9:14 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 5:57 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 2009-10-27, at 8:29 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Joe Kramer wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to make the life of the person doing our acceptance
testing easier by creating a ut
On 28/10/2009, at 12:17 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
Can you execute:
OrderItem.newOrderItem(ec, 1, "iMac 27\" Quad-Core 2.66GHz/1TB/4GB",
"*0.00"
*)
and have it shipped to my house? :P
throws new EOUtilities.MoreThanOneException when attempting to fetch
required client where location like '
Can you execute:
OrderItem.newOrderItem(ec, 1, "iMac 27\" Quad-Core 2.66GHz/1TB/4GB", "*0.00"
*)
and have it shipped to my house? :P
-Lon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
>
> The newOrder() and newOrderItem() are just convenience methods I wrote for
> creating and in
On Oct 27, 2009, at 5:57 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 2009-10-27, at 8:29 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Joe Kramer wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to make the life of the person doing our acceptance
testing easier by creating a utility that deletes all the objects
from our da
On 2009-10-27, at 8:29 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Joe,
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Joe Kramer wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to make the life of the person doing our acceptance
testing easier by creating a utility that deletes all the objects
from our database without having to run our drop
The newOrder() and newOrderItem() are just convenience methods I wrote
for creating and inserting into the editing context to test this
particular EOF scenario. Then I used the removeFromItems() method
generated by the Wonder templates. But I believe that ends up calling
removeObjectFro
Very interesting... You are right David. I have confirmed the same too.
Adding a call to ec.processRecentChanges() between the add and the
remove makes this work as I expected it.
Here's the code:
EOEditingContext ec = ERXEC.newEditingContext();
Order order = Order.newOrder
Hi Joe,
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Joe Kramer wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to make the life of the person doing our acceptance
testing easier by creating a utility that deletes all the objects
from our database without having to run our drop/create scripts and
restart our app every time
On 2009-10-27, at 7:52 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
Try:
Create an Order and OrderItem and insert both into an editing
context.
Then add the item to the order using
order.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(item, "items").
Then call editi
My guess it's the "array" is appropriate but the editingContext
insertedObjects is not correct.
I won't try to help anymore. :P
-Lon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
>
> Try:
>>
>> Create an Order and OrderItem and insert b
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:40 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
Try:
Create an Order and OrderItem and insert both into an editing context.
Then add the item to the order using
order.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(item, "items").
Then call editingContext.processRecentChanges()
Then removeObject
Try:
Create an Order and OrderItem and insert both into an editing context.
Then add the item to the order using
order.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(item, "items").
*Then call editingContext.processRecentChanges()*
Then removeObjectFromBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(item, "items") to r
Hi all,
I am trying to make the life of the person doing our acceptance testing
easier by creating a utility that deletes all the objects from our database
without having to run our drop/create scripts and restart our app every time
she wants to start a test from a clean environment. Is there an
Resending with some typos fixed... :-)
Hi,
Let's say you have to-many relationship between two entities: Order
<-->> OrderItem. The to-many relationship is called "items" and "Owns
Desintation" is checked.
Test #1: Create an Order and OrderItem and insert both into an
editing context.
Hi,
Let's say you have to-many relationship between two entities: Order
<-->> OrderItem. The to-many relationship is called "items".
The items to-many is flagged to indicate that the Order owns the
destination OrderItem.
Test #1: Create an Order and OrderItem and insert both into an
e
Am 27.10.2009 um 05:35 schrieb Tavis McDevitt:
Thanks to all who responded. My linked list was going to store
workflows for a document processing application. I can certainly
store it in a set of records with integer attributes for ordering,
but will of course have to write the functionali
Just to summarize, the problem was that:
new NSArray( new int [] { ... } )
translates to the single-object NSArray constructor:
NSArray( Object ), whereas:
new NSArray( new Integer [] { ... } )
translates to the object-array constructor: NSArray( Object [] ),
because an i
Just a performance hint. You don't want to use "new Integer(2000)".
Use "Integer.valueOf(2000)". Integer.valueOf allows for the cacheing
of values.
appliedYear is an Integer.
I've added a formatter = "", but not help. I tried #1 but it
requires a "new Integer(2000)"
Dear Theodore,
thank you very much - I have updated the link. I hope Tavis will not
have anything against me helping him.
sincerely yours
Bojan
On 27-Oct-09, at 11:14 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
check the links on the page...
Message: 9
|Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
|From:
check the links on the page...
Message: 9
|Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
|From: Tavis McDevitt
|Subject: Re: 2009 Survey Results
|To: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
|Message-ID: <349667.24031...@web58101.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
|Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
|To try an
Hi everyone,
I've got a strange behavior and I think it could be a bug.
Here is the situation, I've got a component, that we will name MyComponent,
like this:
In an other component, i've got this
Until there, no problem but I need to create MyComponent programmatically,
so t
> The cascade is working but the ordering is wrong. SQL Server can't handle
> deferred constraints. The easiest solution is to drop the FK constraint.
> The other solution is to order the delete operations and that is NOT easily
> done.
Thx, the easy way worked.
You were right about SQLServer
On 26 okt 2009, at 02:09, Pascal Robert wrote:
> We have an app that use CUPS to print labels. The framework use JIPSI :
>
> http://www.lohndirekt.de/software/jipsi_quickstart_drucksoftware.html
>
> Disclaimer : I didn't setup the CUPS server and didn't work on the app, I
> just know that we h
26 matches
Mail list logo
