Hi George,
Did you notice much of a change in performance?
Cheers,
Chuck
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:38 PM, George Domurot wrote:
For what it's worth... We put OpenBase 64bit into production last
month. It's quite nice. I think it gets a public release soon.
-George
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:03 PM
Fact: Chuck Hill is smarter than Chuck Norris.
:-P
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
That sounds like a Chuck Norris fact :-P
Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in Front
That sounds like a Chuck Norris fact :-P
Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBase
when Chuck was vehemently attacking MySQL a while back ;-)
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Mike Schr
Looks something like this...
Unable to find a SOAP style for service and port. Skipping.
{http://xyz.com/ServiceName}ServiceName BasicHttpBinding_ServiceNameService
This is a weird one. Gotta hate it when Google bats 0.000 on your
errors. Does anyone have experience with this error or per
For what it's worth... We put OpenBase 64bit into production last month. It's
quite nice. I think it gets a public release soon.
-George
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>
>> I just wi
Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBase
when Chuck was vehemently attacking MySQL a while back ;-)
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Geert said it's been in producti
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBase
when Chuck was vehemently attacking MySQL a while back ;-)
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Geert said it's been in production use with one of their customers
since July ... So it's not really a .0 release.
ms
Geert said it's been in production use with one of their customers since July
... So it's not really a .0 release.
ms
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:
> Hi Cail,
>
> Thank you. This is great!
>
> Is it stable enough for upgrading our large scale deployments?
>
>
For sure, I experience this with the lists all the time.
Tim Worman
UCLA GSE&IS
On Jan 7, 2010, at 2:54 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Reading this article put into clear terms as to why I find the WO/Wonder
> Lists so valuable:
>
> http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/fail_accept_defeat/
>
Hi Cail,
Thank you. This is great!
Is it stable enough for upgrading our large scale deployments?
Or is it still going to be a dot zero release for a while.
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
This message contains confidential information a
Reading this article put into clear terms as to why I find the WO/Wonder Lists
so valuable:
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/fail_accept_defeat/
Excerpt:
This is why other people are so helpful: They shock us out of our cognitive
box. “I saw this happen all the time,” Dunbar says. “A sci
Hi Dennis,
I can confirm that FB5 does support Intel 64 bit.
-Cail
On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:
Hopefully, it will be "Intel (64 bit)"!!!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
On 2010-01-07, at 7:26 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
:-)
On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55,
Hopefully, it will be "Intel (64 bit)"!!!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
On 2010-01-07, at 7:26 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
> :-)
>
> On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Just got an email from Geert at FrontBase that FB5 should be out in a week
>> or two ... So, FB lives
Hi!
It depends on how long does the task take to run, and how heavy
does it hit the DB. For complex stuff, we use dedicated apps. For
simple stuff, a Java thread will do, or maybe that wonder class (I
didn't know it existed, gonna look at it).
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2010/01/07, at 00
:-)
On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Just got an email from Geert at FrontBase that FB5 should be out in a week or
> two ... So, FB lives :)
>
> ms
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev ma
I use a Java thread.
My application periodically refresh data from a Calendar Server
Amedeo
On 07/gen/2010, at 01.22, Mark Woollard wrote:
> What's the recommended way to run a periodic task from within a WO
> application? In this case its infrequently (hourly) and independent of any
> web r
On Jan 6, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Mark Woollard wrote:
What's the recommended way to run a periodic task from within a WO
application? In this case its infrequently (hourly) and independent
of any web requests.
Thanks
Mark
___
If you are deplying on
Hi,
In my webpage there are three Frames and on top these frames I am
showing a calculator tool constructed in a DIV element, and we have a
small button(input type="button") in the calculator with label as
"Hold down and Drag to Move" with dragging functionality to move the
calculator on
Just got an email from Geert at FrontBase that FB5 should be out in a week or
two ... So, FB lives :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscrib
Hi Henrique;
> Thank you, that did it. I was thinking I had to change something on the
> server, I now realize the 'on the wire' format is always the same, right?
> It's the client that has to be instructed on how to deserialize.
That's essentially correct. The LEWOJSONFormat handles WO-specif
Hi Miguel,
Thank you. I re-implemented this and it now works. I suspect I had one
of my own validateXXX() methods in one entity subclass that was doing
something stupid.
I thought there would be considerable overhead in running
validateForSave() but timing this suggests it is quite efficient.
I
we have a dedicated scheduler app (based on quartz
http://www.quartz-scheduler.org/) looking after all our repetitive tasks. we
run a single instance of it in production, with change notification
distributing any changes that other apps need to know about. i believe a few
other WO people do the sam
Another vote for quartz!
Might be overkill for a simple recurring task but having the flexibility there
for the future is great.
Henrique Gomes
On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Frédéric JECKER wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quartz (http://www.quartz-scheduler.org/) works pretty well
>
> Regards
>
> Le 7 janv.
Andrew,
Thank you, that did it. I was thinking I had to change something on the server,
I now realize the 'on the wire' format is always the same, right? It's the
client that has to be instructed on how to deserialize.
But does it mean that If I have the EO Model also on the client it will
ins
24 matches
Mail list logo
