This is a great addition to the site!
On 2010-02-17, at 6:48 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Work on the organization and individual profiles is almost complete, same
> case for the job (you will be able to add a new job posting yourself) and
> project pages.
>
> You can preview the pages :
>
>
Looks nice :-)
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Work on the organization and individual profiles is almost complete, same
> case for the job (you will be able to add a new job posting yourself) and
> project pages.
>
> You can preview the pages :
>
> Individual pro
Work on the organization and individual profiles is almost complete, same case
for the job (you will be able to add a new job posting yourself) and project
pages.
You can preview the pages :
Individual profile : http://bit.ly/9kGSiD
Organization profile : http://bit.ly/blLSfO
On 17/Feb/2010, at 4:25 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Hmm varcharLarge is a weird one. It seems like maybe it should be calling
> newLargeStringColumn and that migration for Oracle should use a CLOB.
I'm ok with that! That I can make work! ;-)
> It seems weird that Oracle's definition for longTex
Hmm varcharLarge is a weird one. It seems like maybe it should be calling
newLargeStringColumn and that migration for Oracle should use a CLOB. It seems
weird that Oracle's definition for longText is BLOB and not CLOB, too. The
relationship between longText and varcharLarge is unclear to me.
Hi Everyone!
My EOModel is using ERPrototypes with EOJDBCOraclePrototypes selected.
I have a column set to varcharLarge and when I generate the migration I get:
...
personTable.newStringColumn("longName", false);
...
That statement results in SQL which is invalid in Oracle
Hey!
On 17/Feb/2010, at 1:53 PM, Mark Wardle wrote:
> Might be worth checking it is the session you think it is?
This is certainly something to consider! Setting a break point on the session
constructor would be a quick way to show how many sessions are getting created
and when... Something
On 17/Feb/2010, at 2:46 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
> Look at my website, www.confindustria.chieti.it, in the top right corner
> there is a barely visible number indicating the session timeout value... (
> 1200 ), after user log in, the value go to 3600 and remain 3600, but session
> expires after
Thank you.
On Feb 17, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> expected behavior ... cleanup=true on ERAttachmentUpload to delete the
> previous attachment.
>
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
>
>> LOL.
>>
>> Next question,
>>
>> When I first upload the file using the ERAtta
expected behavior ... cleanup=true on ERAttachmentUpload to delete the previous
attachment.
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:51 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> LOL.
>
> Next question,
>
> When I first upload the file using the ERAttachmentUpload component the
> result is what I'd expect it to be i.e. an obje
LOL.
Next question,
When I first upload the file using the ERAttachmentUpload component the result
is what I'd expect it to be i.e. an object of my entity and an object of
erattachment are created and the file is stored per the configuration.
However, if I then update my entity and upload a ne
Am 17.02.2010 um 23:18 schrieb Ricardo J. Parada:
>> 2) If you have autolocking on and if you are using ERXEC.newEditingContext,
>> you may get deadlocks.
How so?
Cheers, Anjo
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Web
Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
Hmm... I'm using background threads in my apps to do some processing.
The thread creates is editing context for its own use. Something
like this:
EOObjectStoreCoordinator parentObjectStore = new
EOObjectStoreCoordinator();
editingContext = E
You *can* pass EOs between threads. You just really, wanna make sure your
threads don't block each other (and do proper locking, auto may not be good
enough). In particular, you don't wanna use the session EC in a long running
thread.
Cheers, Anjo
Am 17.02.2010 um 21:23 schrieb Kieran Kelleh
Hmm... I'm using background threads in my apps to do some processing. The
thread creates is editing context for its own use. Something like this:
EOObjectStoreCoordinator parentObjectStore = new
EOObjectStoreCoordinator();
editingContext = ERXEC.newEditingContext(parent
Thanks for this.
The advantage (I assume) of a master detail page is that one
presumably can set the master object and the key for the relationship
and so that component can take responsibility (in a model independent
way) for creating, editing and deleting objects hanging off that
relationship ke
The last time I had session troubles, it turned out I had two sessions
as I managed to accidentally create an additional session with some
random session() call. I think this is v easy to do accidentally!
Might be worth checking it is the session you think it is?
I'm definitely not an expert
Some tidbits that might help:
1) Don't pass EOs between threads. Pass their EOGlobalIDs and use
ec.faultForGlobalID to rehydrate them in an ec in the thread that needs them.
Use Wonder ERXEOUtilities.convertEOtoGID if desired. (Something =
'Access' or 'Control', I can never remember which)
Hi all,
I get an issue with a multi threaded application. To be easier to understand,
my description is simpler than the reality but that's enough to see what's
going on I guess.
I'm using:
WO 5.4.3
Snow Leopard/ java 6
Wonder (not the very last but not old)
I put the following properties:
er.e
On 17-Feb-10, at 10:45 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently
sweet tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question
is: when's desert going to be served? :-)
actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking
about makin
+1
>>> He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet
>>> tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's desert
>>> going to be served? :-)
>> actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking about making a
>> new template that was aja
On 2010-02-17, at 10:37 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, David Holt wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2010-02-16, at 5:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
> +1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet
tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The q
Nice looking site!
I am pretty sure that something else is going on. Maybe some code
calling terminate()? Some bad HTML causing a new session to get
created?
Chuck
On Feb 17, 2010, at 2:46 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
Look at my website, www.confindustria.chieti.it, in the top right
co
On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:31 AM, David Holt wrote:
On 2010-02-16, at 5:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
+1
He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently
sweet tasting, hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question
is: when's desert going to be served? :-)
actually not in this ca
On 2010-02-16, at 5:33 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>> +1
>> He's alluding to that still as yet all mysterious, apparently sweet tasting,
>> hazelnut flavoured chocolate treat. The question is: when's desert going to
>> be served? :-)
> actually not in this case ... just that if you were thinking a
On 2010-02-17, at 6:17 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 5:31 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
>> It definitely doesn't work trying to pull an EO in a child ec into it's
>> parent's. i.e:
>>
>> EOEditingContext rootEc = ERXEC.newEditingContext();
>> EOEditingContext childE
i think may be good do use two popups 00:24 and 00:59
i don't see any other solutions that may be simpler( for the user side too )
Amedeo
On 16/feb/2010, at 22.28, James Cicenia wrote:
> Anyone know or can suggest a nice TimeEntry component?
>
> I am not talking a calendar but a nice HH:MM edi
*sorry for the first offlist reply :) *
You'r right and this reminds me the following good practices, also known as the
zen of python (but applies to all languages):
Source : http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/
Beautiful is better than ugly.
Explicit is better than implicit.
Simple is bett
> and I don't think you even need to do the localInstance, do you? (It's been a
> while since I did nested ECs)
yeah, you do have to local instance (or i will blow up)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev
My official policy is that toString() should never be used for real code
dependencies -- it should only be for debugging. It's much better to be
explicit, IMO.
ms
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Frédéric JECKER wrote:
> ... or add a toString() method to your object :)
>
> Le 16 févr. 2010 à 17:5
On Feb 16, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
>> hey now, am i going to walk up? i have a 3-wheeled car right now!
>
> Like this?!
>
> http://upload.ecvv.com/upload/Info/200801/China_Product_C2006516163117102337_Tri_wheel_Motorcycle__Single_Fuel_System__PETROL.jpg
No, Mike's car is much small
On Feb 16, 2010, at 5:31 PM, David LeBer wrote:
> It definitely doesn't work trying to pull an EO in a child ec into it's
> parent's. i.e:
>
> EOEditingContext rootEc = ERXEC.newEditingContext();
> EOEditingContext childEc = ERXEC.newEditingContext(rootEc);
> Movie m = Movie.c
Look at my website, www.confindustria.chieti.it, in the top right corner there
is a barely visible number indicating the session timeout value... ( 1200 ),
after user log in, the value go to 3600 and remain 3600, but session expires
after 1200
Amedeo
On 16/feb/2010, at 22.21, Mark Ritchie wrot
... or add a toString() method to your object :)
Le 16 févr. 2010 à 17:53, James Cicenia a écrit :
> I swear.. I mean it, really, I do, I had .name tagged on that.
>
> Too much D2W can totally mess with one's mind.
>
> I will slay this beast! I swear.
>
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:35 AM, R
Am 16.02.2010 um 22:21 schrieb Mark Ritchie:
P.S. I'm open to learning how to do this in Eclipse however my
understand is that Eclipse can't set break points when it doesn't
have the source code.
Well, he could override setTimeout in his WOSession subclass and set
the breakpoint there...
35 matches
Mail list logo
