CHEF-AID?
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Karl wrote:
> Should we all donate some Aeroplan points to the Chuck Hill Envy Fund to help
> him make it here?
>
> ;-)
>
> Karl
>
> On 2010-06-08, at 3:58 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/Jun/201
Should we all donate some Aeroplan points to the Chuck Hill Envy Fund to help
him make it here?
;-)
Karl
On 2010-06-08, at 3:58 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
>
>> On 8/Jun/2010, at 3:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>> After the lot of you finish off Tomm
On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
On 8/Jun/2010, at 3:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
After the lot of you finish off Tommy's it WILL be a less reputable
establishment! :-)
Now you sound envious... There's still lots of time to hop a plane
and get down here! ;-)
Have no doubt -
On 8/Jun/2010, at 3:31 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> After the lot of you finish off Tommy's it WILL be a less reputable
> establishment! :-)
Now you sound envious... There's still lots of time to hop a plane and get down
here! ;-)
___
Do not post admin r
On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
On 8/Jun/2010, at 3:25 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On the dark side some of us, fueled by WWDC withdrawal, will be
hung over from tequila at much less reputable establishments. :)
Now THAT sounds painful! At least Tommy has quality tequila.
K, got
On 8/Jun/2010, at 3:25 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>> On the dark side some of us, fueled by WWDC withdrawal, will be hung over
>> from tequila at much less reputable establishments. :)
> Now THAT sounds painful! At least Tommy has quality tequila.
K, got the plan: Start with food, warm up at Tommy's
On Jun 8, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Travis Britt wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
A minor consolation is that at least the David's are somewhat
represented.
I should expect so! On the bright side for those of
On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Travis Britt wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
>>>
>>> A minor consolation is that at least the David's are somewhat represented.
>>
>> I should expect so! On the brigh
On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>>
>>> I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
>>
>> A minor consolation is that at least the David's are somewhat represented.
>
> I should expect so! On the bright side for those of us not there, WE won't
> be hung over
On Jun 8, 2010, at 2:34 PM, David Holt wrote:
On 8-Jun-10, at 2:14 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
+1
A minor consolation is that at least the David's are somewhat
represented.
:-)
I should expect so! On the bright side
On 8-Jun-10, at 2:14 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
+1
A minor consolation is that at least the David's are somewhat
represented.
:-)
Dave
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:50 PM, David LeBer wrote:
On 2010-06-08, at 1:37 PM, Karl
Should I take that as a confirmation that you are NOT at WWDC this year?
Karl
On 2010-06-08, at 2:14 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:50 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2010-06-08, at 1:37 PM,
I would just like to offer my heartfelt YOU ALL SUCK best-wishes.
Dave
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:50 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
> On 2010-06-08, at 1:37 PM, Karl wrote:
>
>> Great! Starting at the WWDC bash and continuing at Tommys? Greasy food is
>> essential before Tommys!
>
> Hey Karl, the bash
On 2010-06-08, at 1:37 PM, Karl wrote:
> Great! Starting at the WWDC bash and continuing at Tommys? Greasy food is
> essential before Tommys!
Hey Karl, the bash is on Thursday.
We'll be meeting for dinner tomorrow (Wednesday) that's not saying there won't
be a Tommy's run after that too, bu
Great! Starting at the WWDC bash and continuing at Tommys? Greasy food is
essential before Tommys!
Keep the list posted!
Karl
On 2010-06-08, at 1:33 PM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
> Hey Karl!
> There's an ever expanding group forming for tomorrow night however there's
> also a Tommy's run!! Quick
After the last java update to snow leopard I eventually started getting errors
like this in Eclipse:
Description ResourcePathLocationType
Project 'Ajax' is missing required library:
'/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Classes/laf.jar'
Ajax
Hey Karl!
There's an ever expanding group forming for tomorrow night however
there's also a Tommy's run!! Quick food then awesome tequilla will be
my plan!! ;-)
M.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2010-06-08, at 13:06, Karl wrote:
Hi,
Which list members are at WWDC this year? I haven’t run into
Hi,
Which list members are at WWDC this year? I haven’t run into any of the
regulars yet.
Any plans for a meetup this week?
Karl
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@list
nope.. the WOPopUps that are above and below it work great.
I even made a public selectedRiskProduct and that stays null too.
I am sure it has to do with the Ajax ...
On Jun 8, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Usually, for me, that means I forgot to include it inside a Form element.
>
Usually, for me, that means I forgot to include it inside a Form
element.
On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:53 PM, James Cicenia wrote:
The getter works but this setter never gets called? I removed the
name tag too;
public void setSelectedRiskProducts(NSMutableArray products){
S
The getter works but this setter never gets called? I removed the name tag too;
public void setSelectedRiskProducts(NSMutableArray products){
String ids = "";
for(int i = 0;i ___
Do not post admin requests to the l
Will do, but right now I'm checking didBacktrack() in the page that
calls the long response page, and if it's true and the order was paid,
the "next" button will send them to another page. So far, it's working
great with IE 8, Firefox 3.5 and Safari 4.
You will have to walk through that did
You will have to walk through that didBacktrack message and see which
path it is taking and why.
Chuck
On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
This is not what's happening in my testing so far. With Firefox on
Windows, if I backtrack on the long response page, I get back on the
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:42 AM, gsbr...@umich.edu wrote:
Hi,
When I reboot a 10.4.11 server, wotaskd and monitor? start, but
wotaskd can't start my webapp.
That is either permissions on the executable, permissions on the file
it is logging to, or a mismatched WOHost value.
The symptoms
Hi,
When I reboot a 10.4.11 server, wotaskd and monitor? start, but
wotaskd can't start my webapp. The symptoms are it seems like it
is trying to start, and womonitor shows that it is trying. The
app's log file showed it loaded once, and then the log ends. Of
course, it does not start, and I have
This is not what's happening in my testing so far. With Firefox on
Windows, if I backtrack on the long response page, I get back on the
page where the long response page was called, and if the user call the
long response page again, the code in performAction is performed
again, which create
you can always use the ajax long task stuff, which would not generate a
backtrack entry for each of these refresh states, which is probably what your
users would expect anyway (back = go back to the page prior to the long
operation)
On Jun 8, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
> How is that a
How is that a problem? The only thing the users *might* see while backtracking
is "50% done" followed by "45% done" followed by "51% done" after the next
refresh?
Cheers, Anjo
Am 08.06.2010 um 19:26 schrieb Pascal Robert:
> BTW, how I found out that users are backtracking is because I saw
BTW, how I found out that users are backtracking is because I saw this
in Apache logs :
GET /cgi-bin/WebObjects/Depot.woa/1/wo/1kbJaKnAptsgyX6WIPYrOM/
28.WOMetaRefresh
GET /cgi-bin/WebObjects/Depot.woa/1/wo/1kbJaKnAptsgyX6WIPYrOM/
29.WOMetaRefresh
GET /cgi-bin/WebObjects/Depot.woa/1/wo/1kb
Look like this :
/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Depot.woa/1/wo/a5wsIRHrgb2vaKM3n3WaHg/
9.WOMetaRefresh
What is the URL for the long response page (the URL they are
backtracking to)? Which path is it taking through that method?
Chuck
On Jun 8, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
This is so grea
What is the URL for the long response page (the URL they are
backtracking to)? Which path is it taking through that method?
Chuck
On Jun 8, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
This is so great. Deadlocks are now gone in our app, but I noticed
that some users are using the back button i
This is so great. Deadlocks are now gone in our app, but I noticed
that some users are using the back button in the app. So I looked at
ERXSession.didBacktrack(), and this is working fine for "normal"
components, eg if I backtrack on a normal component, didBacktrack()
returns true.
Proble
YES YES YES Thank you, thank you, thank you.
- j-
On Jun 8, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 9:39 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
>
>> name="CA_type";
>>
>
> How is the form or value for the pop-up being submitted? Are you using an
> AjaxObserveField or a
On Jun 8, 2010, at 9:39 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
> name="CA_type";
>
How is the form or value for the pop-up being submitted? Are you using an
AjaxObserveField or an AjaxSubmitButton?
If by any chance you are using partial form submission with AjaxObserveField
then I would get rid of the
On Jun 8, 2010, at 4:12 AM, James Cicenia wrote:
Sorry Chuck -
This morning I tripled checked all Editing Contexts and they seem
correct.
for my list:
public NSArray ratingsList(){
return
EOUtilities
.localInstancesOfObjects(currentMasterAlert.editingContext(),
user().memberComp
Sorry Chuck -
This morning I tripled checked all Editing Contexts and they seem correct.
for my list:
public NSArray ratingsList(){
return
EOUtilities.localInstancesOfObjects(currentMasterAlert.editingContext(),
user().memberCompanyRole().alertRatings());
}
for my setter:
public
@Andrew - that is certainly a plausible approach and might end up doing.
Going to give this some time.
@Pascal - in my case yes, the plain old fetch spec didn't work. Like i said
in the example, searching for %pe% did not return rows with pépé.
Thanks,
Amiel
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 4:41 AM, Pasca
37 matches
Mail list logo
