Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Farrukh Ijaz
Hi Mark, Thanks for the detailed explanation. Comments below: On 2010-11-06, at 10:35 PM, Mark Wardle wrote: > Hi Farrukh, > > I'm no expert on these matters but unless I have a very simple and > straightforward plan of inheritance that would be immediately obvious > to someone else joining the

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:12 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: > Ok, I am not able to figure that one out. Pls translate! > > WebObjects direct to data center? Yes. > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > >> And release WOD2DC? >> >> >> On Nov 6, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Kieran Kelleher
Ok, I am not able to figure that one out. Pls translate! WebObjects direct to data center? On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:59 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > And release WOD2DC? > > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: > >> I was thinking the same thing. Maybe apple will sell Virtual os x serve

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Farrukh Ijaz
Hi Chuck, All the entities (A, B, C, and D) eventually have become IS-A relationship. I would also like to use interface instead of inheritance but thinking how I can manage the Entity E to have toOne relationship for all these entities using interface. May be I need to write custom code to man

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
And release WOD2DC? On Nov 6, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: > I was thinking the same thing. Maybe apple will sell Virtual os x server > instances running in north Carolina data center cloud?! > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Tim Worman wrote: > >> It's hard not to feel like more i

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Kieran Kelleher
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe apple will sell Virtual os x server instances running in north Carolina data center cloud?! On Nov 6, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Tim Worman wrote: > It's hard not to feel like more is yet unsaid about some of these changes. I > wonder if Light Peak is going to play

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
One with the eyes cut out or one to stick pins in? I've had this horrible neck pain... On Nov 6, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Mark Wardle wrote: > Trouble is, I cut out the photos for my wall shrine a long time ago :P > > Mark > > On 6 November 2010 21:57, Chuck Hill wrote: >> >> On Nov 6, 2010, at 1

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Wardle
Trouble is, I cut out the photos for my wall shrine a long time ago :P Mark On 6 November 2010 21:57, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Mark Wardle wrote: > >> I'm sending the book back. I bought it because of those two photos and >> quite frankly... if they're fake. >> >> D

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
If all they share is a few common, generic attributes, I would not use inheritance for this. I'd prefer an interface. As Mark pointed out, inheritance is for "IS A" relationships. It is not to save some implementation time. That is an abuse of inheritance. If they share behavior, then inh

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
On Nov 6, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Mark Wardle wrote: > I'm sending the book back. I bought it because of those two photos and > quite frankly... if they're fake. > > Does amazon take returns for books five years old? If you write LIAR! LIAR! over the photos and send back the back cover, I think

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Antonio Petri
I wonder if Apple ever ran anything of their web infrastructure on Apple hardware. At certain point in the past, they didn't even have a server OS, never mind an Xserve; I can't believe they used Mac OS Classic. It might well always been on different hardware and software, maybe Sun kits with Solar

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Steve Peery
If that is the case, then your Abstract Entity Alpha scenario seems reasonable. Steve On Nov 6, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote: > Yes, they will expose certain properties which are symmetrical in all the > entities, e.g. title, description, etc. > > Consider this requirement as a tree s

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Farrukh Ijaz
Yes, they will expose certain properties which are symmetrical in all the entities, e.g. title, description, etc. Consider this requirement as a tree structure which can have nodes that appear to be symmetric but their underlying user object can be different. Farrukh Sent from my iPhone On

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Karl
I do not believe that its full of HP, DELL, IBM (Levono) or other vendors gear. The BServe perhaps? Karl On 2010-11-06, at 4:39 PM, Tim Worman wrote: > It's hard not to feel like more is yet unsaid about some of these changes. I > wonder if Light Peak is going to play a role in filling lost 1

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread Tim Worman
It's hard not to feel like more is yet unsaid about some of these changes. I wonder if Light Peak is going to play a role in filling lost 1U features - like fibre connectivity, etc.? On OS X Server in clouds/vm's - that ginormous data center might have more uses than we know. When I think of

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Wardle
I'm sending the book back. I bought it because of those two photos and quite frankly... if they're fake. Does amazon take returns for books five years old? Mark -- Dispatch estimate for these items: 3 April 2005 - 3 April 2005 Delivery estimate: 6 April 2005 - 7 April 2005 1 "Practical Web

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Mark Wardle
Hi Farrukh, I'm no expert on these matters but unless I have a very simple and straightforward plan of inheritance that would be immediately obvious to someone else joining the project, I've avoiding using EOF inheritance. I've dabbled with a number of options depending on the exact circumstances

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
On Nov 6, 2010, at 6:12 AM, Antonio Petri wrote: > But... you wear a dress shirt and even a tie in your picture on your book... That was marketing, not real life. :-) -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Chuck Hill
Someone has been drinking the kool-aid! > // Hugi Thordarson > // Doing J2EE and Maven but not eating babies. Yet. Just a matter of time, just a matter of time... On Nov 6, 2010, at 5:41 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote: > Man, after spending 2 days with enterprise Java people at the Alfresco >

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Jean-Francois Veillette
> 2. The other way mentioned in the lower diagram where Entity A, Entity B, > Entity C and Entity D extend Abstract Entity X and Entity E will have toOne > relationship with Abstract Entity X. (This is _desirable_). Not knowing anymore that that of your model, I would take the Entity Alpha opti

Re: EOModel needs an easy tweak

2010-11-06 Thread Steve Peery
Is there any shared functionality between Entity A, Entity B, Entity C and Entity D that would justify Abstract Entity Alpha? Steve On Nov 6, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote: > Hi EOF-ologists, > > I've a modelling issue and need to know what could be the suitable fix (or > tweak) to ful

Resource Loading via class.getResource, class.getClassLoader().getResource and application().resourceManager()

2010-11-06 Thread Larry Mills-Gahl
Hello, I'm having some difficulty with loading some resources from the source file. I'm trying to package up transform files in the jars so they can be accessible to any java process that loads the jar and not just webobjects applications. The specific task here is loading transforms and image res

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Antonio Petri
But... you wear a dress shirt and even a tie in your picture on your book... > > > Man, after spending 2 days with enterprise Java people at the Alfresco > DevCon (a DEVELOPER conference where a good chunk of the guys wear dress > shirt? > > Now that is just plain wrong. > > > > > #fail), I'm lov

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Hugi Thordarson
Man, after spending 2 days with enterprise Java people at the Alfresco DevCon (a DEVELOPER conference where a good chunk of the guys wear dress shirt? >>> >>> Now that is just plain wrong. >> >> One of the presentation also said "Use Maven", that's explain everything :-) > > Don

Re: Greetings!

2010-11-06 Thread Lachlan Deck
On 06/11/2010, at 12:25 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > Le 2010-11-05 à 21:21, Chuck Hill a écrit : > >> On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: >> >>> Man, after spending 2 days with enterprise Java people at the Alfresco >>> DevCon (a DEVELOPER conference where a good chunk of the guys we

Re: [OT] No more XServe

2010-11-06 Thread ISHIMOTO Ken
There are two Server Options left now : Mac mini with Snow Leopard Server : 999 USD Mac Pro Server : 2999 USD We use about 10 Mac mini Server now for about 4 years and the work great. On 2010/11/05, at 23:46, Chuck Hill wrote: > I suppose it is possible, but I would regard that as unlikely. O