On 17.11.2010, at 14:57, David Avendasora
wrote:
Ah. It's a disused Omni list.
Why would we want to fragment the community by taking a valuable
conversation to a place that no one goes?
Dave
Because a specific single developer doesn't care and therefore this
topic is irrelevant.
Ma
could just be a bug ... if you can make a small sample project that would save
me some time
On Nov 19, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Hi (especially Mike S.),
>
> Mike, in the comments you made on my ERRest slides for WOWODC, you said that
> sub-entities should be created for To Many
Hi (especially Mike S.),
Mike, in the comments you made on my ERRest slides for WOWODC, you said that
sub-entities should be created for To Many relationships, but I just tried back
and it's doesn't work for me. I have a Order with a relation (1:N) to
OrderItem, and each OrderItem is linked to
Greetings Dave,
Good answer. Does the service "Dropbox" allow a developer to acquire their
capability in a semi-private environment. In otherwords, if the material in
question is sensitive and the client wants the capabilities of Dropbox on
their own system, would Dropbox be open to selling an in
not sure ... i'd have to think about that one.
On Nov 19, 2010, at 2:56 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2010, at 2:49 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
>> On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>
>>> you can't do bundleless builds without Wonder
>>
>> Oh yeah. That makes sen
On Nov 19, 2010, at 2:49 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> you can't do bundleless builds without Wonder
>
> Oh yeah. That makes sense... but it's somewhat less than intuitive.
>
> Bundleless builds rock and can eliminate all sorts of other po
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> you can't do bundleless builds without Wonder
Oh yeah. That makes sense... but it's somewhat less than intuitive.
Bundleless builds rock and can eliminate all sorts of other potential issues,
so would it make sense to include that library in W
hm
These symptoms are surprisingly like mine. How do I make it NOT do Bundle-less
builds?
James
On Nov 19, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> * unless you copy those jars into your app from wonder
>
> On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:39 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm
> Also like how you can do inline basic logic i.e.(see rendered attribute).
>
> rendered="#{manufacturer.pagingInfo.itemCount == 0}" />
>
> Is there a way to do that with WOGNL?
"can" vs "should". Can you? sure, same thing but with a ~. Should you? probably
not. Code in Java, not in bindings.
Hi,
I'm on the NetBeans mailing list so I received the message today to download
the NetBeans 7 Beta. Just going through it now and checking out a sample JSF
CRUD project.
I've got to say they've done a very nice job with the UI - it is very native
looking. The inline content assist is very
On 2010-11-19, at 12:47 PM, Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D wrote:
> Greetings Chuck,
> Ok, so it sounds like it could be a bindings thing, or something called
> "Dropbox". Is dropbox a framework, component, or something? If so, where do
> I find it and how do I use it? Also, I think Ch
http://www.dropbox.com/
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D <
daniel.bea...@navy.mil> wrote:
> Greetings Chuck,
> Ok, so it sounds like it could be a bindings thing, or something called
> "Dropbox". Is dropbox a framework, component, or something? If so, where
Greetings Chuck,
Ok, so it sounds like it could be a bindings thing, or something called
"Dropbox". Is dropbox a framework, component, or something? If so, where do I
find it and how do I use it? Also, I think Chuck is correct about the web
browser being the thing that times out.
Thank you,
Hi all,
I have a Many-to-Many relationship and the join table does _not_ have a
compound PK. It has a normal PK with a dataType of Long. The FKs that represent
the to-One relationships on the join table are simply FKs and not part of the
PK.
I would like to flatten the toMany relationships, bu
* unless you copy those jars into your app from wonder
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:39 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just trying to create a HelloWorld app for a quick demo, and when I
> create a WebObjects Application using the defaults using the current WOLips,
> it won't run.
>
>
you can't do bundleless builds without Wonder
On Nov 19, 2010, at 12:39 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm just trying to create a HelloWorld app for a quick demo, and when I
> create a WebObjects Application using the defaults using the current WOLips,
> it won't run.
>
> First I
Hi all,
I'm just trying to create a HelloWorld app for a quick demo, and when I create
a WebObjects Application using the defaults using the current WOLips, it won't
run.
First I get:
[2010-11-18 14:58:15 EST] Waiting for requests...
[2010-11-18 14:58:15 EST]
: Exception
occurred while hand
The upload should not timeout in the app (not sure about the browser) if it is
setup for streaming to the file system. I don't recall the exact combination
of bindings to achieve this.
Chuck
On Nov 19, 2010, at 8:31 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Use Dropbox to upload the file and use their APIs
james,
This sounds like a class path order problem or possibly noxymo (which I
know nothing about) is related to the issue ..
Why not log out the actual classpath in Application.didFinishLaunching() and
examine it to see if your app bundles and ERExtensions are foremost..
Use Dropbox to upload the file and use their APIs to get the files :-P
> Greetings Dave's, ladies, and gentlemen,
> I am working a prototype for D2W Modern Look and for the most part it is
> looking good. I am running into trouble with ER Attachment in D2W Modern
> Look when it comes to files
Greetings Dave's, ladies, and gentlemen,
I am working a prototype for D2W Modern Look and for the most part it is
looking good. I am running into trouble with ER Attachment in D2W Modern Look
when it comes to files >3GB in size. Naturally, the web browser or the
session times out (even with
+1
S. Tunji Turner
sightuary / firstsightmedia
On Nov 19, 2010, at 10:16 AM, André Mitra wrote:
> wirehose beckons, but where is gary...
>
> On 2010-11-19, at 9:17 AM, Jean-Francois Veillette wrote:
>
> One thing that has always worried me about scalability is keeping the per
> user
Hi all,
I need to upload several files at a time, what is the best way to do it:
AjaxUpload or AjaxFlexibleUpload?
AjaxFlexibleFielUpload uses Adrew Valums routine, but it don't work like on the
examples of valums website (there you can load several file at one time)
AjaxUpload uses jquery, can
wirehose beckons, but where is gary...
On 2010-11-19, at 9:17 AM, Jean-Francois Veillette wrote:
One thing that has always worried me about scalability is keeping the per
user "application state" on the server in WOSession. Knowing more about
REST now, this is very unrestful and
>>> One thing that has always worried me about scalability is keeping the per
>>> user "application state" on the server in WOSession. Knowing more about
>>> REST now, this is very unrestful and not stateless, which means will not
>>> scale.
>>
>> I don't see why something being unrestful and n
Yea... now it doesn't think Main is a WOComponent.
Question... is it possible to just start the macbookrpro in firewrire mode and
then just copy everything relevant from my workstation to it?
Wouldn't that cure the problem? Or you can't just copy.
Thanks
James
On Nov 18, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Chuc
26 matches
Mail list logo
