Someone recently implemented a video transcoder using ERAttachment and file
upload?
Perhaps using SCALA to fork tasks from WO?
I'm looking for advice and experience on the topic if anyone has recently done
or has something to say
___
Do not post a
Just one, but they have to be from Iceland
On Sep 26, 2011, at 2:28 PM, "Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D"
wrote:
> Greetings Philip,
> Chuck only needs one certification, but it seems that the certifiers are all
> pass out during the evaluation. We can't understand it. How many bottl
Greetings Philip,
Chuck only needs one certification, but it seems that the certifiers are all
pass out during the evaluation. We can't understand it. How many bottles of
Guinness does it take to make a certification?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: webobjects-dev-bounces+daniel.bea
Ho I love that. I don't have any certification :-)
Philippe
Sent from my iPhone
On 26 sept. 2011, at 20:37, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> And I tend to be cautious about people with too many certifications. Passing
> tests makes you a good student, not a good developer.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> --
> Chu
That Crazy Manager Paul... ;)
Very proud of you, Paula.
Paul
On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Paula Loehr wrote:
> As a front end applications developer of a WO application, when I transferred
> to our WO project 4 years ago, I didn’t know WO at all. I came from a PC
> background, so for that m
Nice story! Thanks for sharing.
David
On 2011-09-26, at 1:04 PM, Paula Loehr wrote:
> As a front end applications developer of a WO application, when I transferred
> to our WO project 4 years ago, I didn’t know WO at all. I came from a PC
> background, so for that matter I didn’t know the MA
As a front end applications developer of a WO application, when I
transferred to our WO project 4 years ago, I didn¹t know WO at all. I came
from a PC background, so for that matter I didn¹t know the MAC world at all
(all my PC friends told me I had transferred over to the dark side. I agree
and
On 2011-09-26, at 4:48 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> We have to make WO "cool" again, so that means a new "WO in 5 minutes"
> presentation, a presentation tailored for iOS people, etc., and a
> presentation without some ugly French Canadian accent in it.
I thought that was your sexy French Canad
On 2011-09-24, at 11:38 AM, Marius Soutier wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I know this a difficult and opinionated topic, but I have been asked by a
> friend what technology to choose for a Lean Startup (= 3 months until the
> first minimum viable product). While he and I know WebObjects quite well, I
Good afternoon,
I created a small (4 questions) feedback survey for WOWODC 2012. Basically, I
want to know who is planning to attend the EOF boot camp and/or the "regular"
WOWODC, and who wants to present. I'm also asking for 4 different dates
(multi-selection, please mark down all dates when y
Le 2011-09-26 à 13:23, Marius Soutier a écrit :
> But there are also good programmers who don't want to use WebObjects. They
> are interested, but they don't want to do it all-day long. They prefer stuff
> like Sinatra, Clojure, and so on, which gives them more freedom of choice on
> how to so
But there are also good programmers who don't want to use WebObjects. They are
interested, but they don't want to do it all-day long. They prefer stuff like
Sinatra, Clojure, and so on, which gives them more freedom of choice on how to
solve their problems.
On 26.09.2011, at 19:19, Paul Yu wrot
On 2011-09-26, at 10:19 AM, Paul Yu wrote:
> Great programmers will always write great code.
>
> Great programmers will write great code faster with great tools.
Then there's that class of programmers that write great tools, THEN write great
code with them :-)
>
> Bad programmers will alway
Great programmers will always write great code.
Great programmers will write great code faster with great tools.
Bad programmers will always complain that it is not them, but the tools fault.
Bad Managers will trump them all...
On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:14 PM, David LeBer wrote:
>
> On 2011-09-2
On 2011-09-26, at 10:14 AM, David LeBer wrote:
>
> On 2011-09-26, at 1:05 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Jim Kinsey wrote:
>>
>>> The last time I did any interviewing for developers, we ended up with some
>>> devs who really did not want to engage with WO on an
On 2011-09-26, at 1:05 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Jim Kinsey wrote:
>
>> The last time I did any interviewing for developers, we ended up with some
>> devs who really did not want to engage with WO on any level, no matter how
>> they came across in the interview
On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Jim Kinsey wrote:
> The last time I did any interviewing for developers, we ended up with some
> devs who really did not want to engage with WO on any level, no matter how
> they came across in the interview. Years of complaining about WO, misusing it
> in ways whi
I've learned to set the connection dictionary in the Properties.[myUsername]
file of the Application not the model framework for development. Then in
production or test environments, set them in
/etc/WebObjects/AppInstanceName/Properties file.
Paul
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:46 AM, David Holt wrot
On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> thanks Paul and George,
>
> So here are my steps based on information gleaned from your replies.
>
> 1. Create new Wonder Framework. This framework is special in that it contains
> no Application nor DirectAction nor Session java classes.
On 2011-09-26, at 3:28 AM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> thanks Paul and George,
>
> So here are my steps based on information gleaned from your replies.
>
> 1. Create new Wonder Framework. This framework is special in that it contains
> no Application nor DirectAction nor Session java classes.
>
Golipse build 12 with Pascal's fix for this is available for download now.
On 2011-09-26, at 7:55 AM, Kai Lochbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the update.
>
> But the script fails to install because the update site for mechanics has
> changed. See:
> http://blatherberg.wordpress.com/2011/09/24
Good morning everyone,
We are holding a Documentation Task Force meeting today at 11am EST (GMT -4).
If you want to help on WO, Project Wonder and WOLips documentation, please meet
us at:
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/373262168
Thanks.
___
Do
Hi Marius,
On 23/09/2011, at 5:29 PM, Marius Soutier wrote:
> Paul, are you depending on the bundle when building from Hudson? For me this
> property only mattes inside of Eclipse because I'm working bundle-less (which
> is much more compatible with other plug-ins).
I run the unit tests inside
Le 2011-09-26 à 07:55, Kai Lochbaum a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the update.
>
> But the script fails to install because the update site for mechanics has
> changed. See:
> http://blatherberg.wordpress.com/2011/09/24/new-home-for-the-workspace-mechanic-update-sites/
"The old repositories wi
I will update it. Eclipse 3.7.1 was also released last week (with support for
Java 1.7), so we will probably need to update that too.
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the update.
>
> But the script fails to install because the update site for mechanics has
> changed. See:
> http://blatherberg.wordpress.co
Hi,
thanks for the update.
But the script fails to install because the update site for mechanics
has changed. See:
http://blatherberg.wordpress.com/2011/09/24/new-home-for-the-workspace-mechanic-update-sites/
Regards,
Kai Lochbaum
Am 19.09.11 01:43, schrieb David LeBer:
All,
Thanks to some
Le 2011-09-26 à 07:36, Paul Yu a écrit :
> My experience with hiring programmers.
>
> Type 1: Chasing after the next job. The only reason that they want your job
> is so it prepares them for their next job. They want the acronyms of the day
> to beef up their resume. These guys usually hav
Le 2011-09-26 à 06:57, Jim Kinsey a écrit :
> The last time I did any interviewing for developers, we ended up with some
> devs who really did not want to engage with WO on any level, no matter how
> they came across in the interview. Years of complaining about WO, misusing it
> in ways which
My experience with hiring programmers.
Type 1: Chasing after the next job. The only reason that they want your job
is so it prepares them for their next job. They want the acronyms of the day
to beef up their resume. These guys usually have a lot of acronyms and
certifications on their resu
On 26.09.2011, at 12:57, Jim Kinsey wrote:
> experienced JEE types who have all the certs under the Sun
Nice one! :)
I agree with you, people who know Java well and have at least basic Cocoa /
CocoaTouch exp should be able to grasp WO rather quickly.
I'll check out the Community Talk now, th
There was a project here that used Cayenne a while ago, but it didn't gain much
traction. Often thought that was a shame!
On 26 Sep 2011, at 12:05, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jim Kinsey wrote:
>
>> Sadly, I am no longer using WO professionally and only maintain an
On Sep 26, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Jim Kinsey wrote:
> Sadly, I am no longer using WO professionally and only maintain an interest
> for a side project. As for what happened on my last team, the new devs got
> their way and the system was ported to Hibernate. Amusingly, this is still
> not in produc
The last time I did any interviewing for developers, we ended up with some devs
who really did not want to engage with WO on any level, no matter how they came
across in the interview. Years of complaining about WO, misusing it in ways
which hurt the performance of the system (as the last remain
I think I didn't sent the link to the Community Talk slides from WOWODC 2011...
Anyway, the slides give a good overview of the community:
http://wocommunity.org/podcasts/wowodc/2011/slides/CommunityTalk.pdf
It's a good companion to the "Finding WO people for startups" thread.
--
Pascal Rober
thanks Paul and George,
So here are my steps based on information gleaned from your replies.
1. Create new Wonder Framework. This framework is special in that it contains
no Application nor DirectAction nor Session java classes.
2. Add a .eomodeld file for the database. if using the properties
On Sep 26, 2011, at 11:26 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> Andrus, I have to ask a legal question: since people say Cayenne is EOF-like,
> does Cayenne is clean of EOF patents?
I am answering this question following what wise people elsewhere in the open
source world advise to do in this case: I hav
Le 2011-09-26 à 03:59, Andrus Adamchik a écrit :
>
> On Sep 26, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
>
>> Am 26.09.2011 um 07:39 schrieb John Huss:
>>
>>> Cayenne + Tapestry
>>
>> We tried it some years ago (it might have evolved) in a larger project
>> (customer did not want WO) but it
On Sep 26, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
> Am 26.09.2011 um 07:39 schrieb John Huss:
>
>> Cayenne + Tapestry
>
> We tried it some years ago (it might have evolved) in a larger project
> (customer did not want WO) but it was not ready. And every new release broke
> some APIs...
Ca
Am 26.09.2011 um 07:39 schrieb John Huss:
> Cayenne + Tapestry
We tried it some years ago (it might have evolved) in a larger project
(customer did not want WO) but it was not ready. And every new release broke
some APIs...
Back to Marius' question:
As WO evolved from Cocoa you could try to
39 matches
Mail list logo
