Hello,
(I mentioned this at the bottom of a thread on wonder-disc, but it probably got
buried.)
I'm looking at building some WebObjects applications on Amazon EC2 (with
Jenkins). Amazon Linux provides packages for OpenJDK. I'm sure I could get a
Sun/Oracle JDK installed if I tried, but it's
bivDAV != bizDAV
On 05/03/2012, at 12:19 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Thanks for your kind help in the past with our new complicated Lion Server
> SSD Deployment setup.
> Everything is working and rebooting smoothly now.
>
> Still one funny thing:
>
> vds4.webappz.com
Hi List,
Thanks for your kind help in the past with our new complicated Lion
Server SSD Deployment setup.
Everything is working and rebooting smoothly now.
Still one funny thing:
vds4.webappz.com 185.17.119.103 - - [04/Mar/2012:18:11:04 -0800] "GET
/cgi-bin/WebObjects/bizDAV HTTP/1.1" 200 78
On 2012-03-04, at 8:13 AM, G Brown wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have a question about the wolips build path. It seems to have some
> pathology, or I am mis-understanding something.
>
> If I have a project, a projectA and everhthing compiles correctly, then when
> I bring in a different project to the w
On 05/03/2012, at 9:40 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> Hey Alan,
>
> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
>
>> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm
>> curious where you are coming from here? Did you have a contract that
>> obligated Apple to continue to supp
Le 2012-03-04 à 18:40, Lachlan Deck a écrit :
> Hey Alan,
>
> On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
>
>> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm
>> curious where you are coming from here? Did you have a contract that
>> obligated Apple to continue to suppo
Hey Alan,
On 05/03/2012, at 9:32 AM, Alan Ward wrote:
> Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm curious
> where you are coming from here? Did you have a contract that obligated Apple
> to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you have for a law
> s
Speaking for myself (and definitely not on behalf of my employer) I'm curious
where you are coming from here? Did you have a contract that obligated Apple
to continue to support you? What grounds to you believe you have for a law
suit? I'm just curious.
Alan
On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Gaa
Apple ran out of money and can't afford to release it; they would just
have to dump WebObjects on us. :-)
On 04/Mar/12 2:11 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Well, I wish you luck. I'm not going to fight with Apple Legal for years, I
prefer actually moving the community forward and stopping looking at
Well, I wish you luck. I'm not going to fight with Apple Legal for years, I
prefer actually moving the community forward and stopping looking at the past.
> Apple is a North American company. So wouldn't a class action suit make
> sense? We all have a lot riding on WebObjects and Apple has termi
On Mar 3, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Francois Bientz wrote:
> Change WebObjectsDocumentRoot in apache.conf
Right, for deployment. Everything will be in the right place then.
Thanks.
kib
"The trouble with normal is it always gets worse."
Bruce Cockburn
Klaus Berkling
Web Application Dev. & Systems A
On Mar 3, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> The general WO Properties are in
> https://developer.apple.com/legacy/mac/library/#documentation/WebObjects/WOAppProperties/Articles/ApplicationProperties.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40005337-SW1
>
> I don't see anything there, so I looked in ERXS
Apple is a North American company. So wouldn't a class action suit make
sense? We all have a lot riding on WebObjects and Apple has terminated
us in 2009 without any proper notice period and reasoning. I am sure we
could get over a 1000 participants.
Dennis
On 04/Mar/12 7:16 AM, Matteo Centro
Also, even with the project closed, the eomodler complains about the closed
ERXExtensions project, so I guess one has to not introduce ANY dependent
projects at all.
On Mar 4, 2012, at 11:13 AM, G Brown wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have a question about the wolips build path. It seems to have some
> p
HI,
I have a question about the wolips build path. It seems to have some pathology,
or I am mis-understanding something.
If I have a project, a projectA and everhthing compiles correctly, then when I
bring in a different project to the workspace, e.g. ERXExtensions, now all of a
sudden project
It is certainly a good point... Don't know if it makes sense in real life but,
count me in!
Matteo
Sent from my iPhone
On 04/mar/2012, at 11:54, Helmut Tschemernjak wrote:
>
> I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to be
> supported or opened to the communit
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Helmut Tschemernjak wrote:
>
> I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important to
> be supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple
> shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock owners,
> bringing
I have an idea how to make Apple aware that the WebObjects is important
to be supported or opened to the community. We need to get as many Apple
shareholders we can, to demand with a significant amount of stock
owners, bringing up an motion to discuss the WebObjects support in an
extra announ
But I am happy to be 1 of 800 Worldwide.
^^
On 2012/03/04, at 9:39, Pascal Robert wrote:
> As every decisions Apple makes, we will never know why. But I guess that they
> don't see why they should support a group of ~ 800 developers… We have more
> .Net developers in Montreal than the total co
As every decisions Apple makes, we will never know why. But I guess that they
don't see why they should support a group of ~ 800 developers… We have more
.Net developers in Montreal than the total count of WO developers (excluding WO
devs inside Apple) world wide!
> Hi List,
>
> Why has Apple
We need to change Project Wonder licencing to forbid Apple using it ;-)
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 4 mars 2012 à 03:15, Chuck Hill a écrit :
> But that would require Apple to release a new version of WO. Only the
> psychotically delusional among us are still expecting that. We have two
> pract
21 matches
Mail list logo
