write rules using significant keys like
session.user.role = "Admin"
or
session.user.access > 4
etc.
and you'll find D2W to be your greatest dream come true.
write low-level rules, just a handful --- and you'll adhere to the logic of
your business purpose.
nice.
On Feb 27, 2013, at 12:
Not much response to this. :-)
On 2013-02-26, at 6:10 AM, Brook, James wrote:
> I have a question about a general approach to high scalability for
> WebObjects applications. In particular I am interested in how people
> handle the incoming requests before they reach the application instances.
Hi all you D2W devs out there!
Your worst nightmare is here, and I'm using D2W for a app about to go into
production!
After it's initial roll-out, one of the next features to be rolled out is to
vary the attributes and relationships displayed to users based on permissions
that they have.
Wha
Hi all,
The only place this key exists in Wonder is in the rules file
d2wClient.d2wmodel.
It seems that they might have been referred to by the web assistant to allow
the selection of a property level component for a given task and attribute or
relationship?
My suspicion is that we could saf
Hi Ken,
Could you imagine an app for male and another one for female?
If that case, you could create your model where table name have _male as
suffix, use it as this in the WOApp for males and with a property file, change
the table names dynamically with, by convention, _female as suffix in the
Chuck,
I'll probably just have the User object determine valid options for that user -
and it can start out be making sure that the Male/Female flags match. Thanks
for the idea!
Ken
On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Maybe something like having then use a Role object and deleg
Ramsey,
Well, this really isn't a business rule - it's basically just that data will be
separated by Male/Female, and you would never attach a Male version of
something (like a workout) to a female customer. I like it when the model
enforces data validity in that way, but I think it's just too
Maybe something like having then use a Role object and delegate the validation
to object?
On 2013-02-26, at 12:38 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Can you give a concrete example illustrating what you mean? Generally I stay
> away from enforcing business rules with the schema. When business rules
>
Can you give a concrete example illustrating what you mean? Generally I stay
away from enforcing business rules with the schema. When business rules change,
as they always do, you're boned. I use the schema to enforce data integrity.
Ramsey
On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
> Al
All,
I have a difficult decision to make and am waffling back and forth. I'm hoping
some of you guys might have come across a similar situation and would have some
recommendations.
I have a model where a number of entities can by applied only to males or only
to females (it's an exercise app)
On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Tabert wrote:
> So, nothing out of the box. Any advise how to start? (maybe there is a
> component that can serve as example)
I use this for everything
https://github.com/nullterminated/ponder/tree/master/ERR2d2w/Components/Nonlocalized.lproj/R2DControllerB
So, nothing out of the box. Any advise how to start? (maybe there is a
component that can serve as example)
And there is a another thing.
If I use the ERDControllerButton within the "subTask" "tab" then the javascript
functions of the button are gone.
On 26.02.2013, at 19:28, Ramsey Gurley w
Having tried multiple times over the years... this is a minor miracle.
Thank you
On Feb 26, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> That has to be a first! Well done Markus!
>
> Chuck
>
> On 2013-02-26, at 10:57 AM, David Holt wrote:
>
>> Hi Markus,
>>
>> I just wanted to let you know that I
That has to be a first! Well done Markus!
Chuck
On 2013-02-26, at 10:57 AM, David Holt wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that I needed to install everything on a
> coworker's Mac yesterday that had never used WebObjects before and it went as
> smoothly as could be hoped f
Hi Markus,
I just wanted to let you know that I needed to install everything on a
coworker's Mac yesterday that had never used WebObjects before and it went as
smoothly as could be hoped following your document. Thanks for your hard work
on it!
David
On 2013-01-14, at 4:18 AM, Markus Ruggier
Then that should be doable, but you may need to customize the component html.
Practically all the actions in my look are done through controller buttons.
On Feb 26, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Jürgen Tabert wrote:
> Nothing special, I want to implement the default behaviour of the
> Inspect/Edit button
Nothing special, I want to implement the default behaviour of the Inspect/Edit
buttons.
On 26.02.2013, at 17:24, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Well, maybe. Define 'access.' What are you trying to do?
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
>
>> Yes :)
>>
>> Ramsey
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2
Well, maybe. Define 'access.' What are you trying to do?
On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:40 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> Yes :)
>
> Ramsey
>
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Jürgen Tabert wrote:
>
>> Is it possible to access the ERModern *Embedded* pages using an
>> ERDControllerButton?
>>
>> Thanks Jürge
Yes :)
Ramsey
On Feb 26, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Jürgen Tabert wrote:
> Is it possible to access the ERModern *Embedded* pages using an
> ERDControllerButton?
>
> Thanks Jürgen
>
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webo
I have a question about a general approach to high scalability for
WebObjects applications. In particular I am interested in how people
handle the incoming requests before they reach the application instances.
I am confident that the Java applications scale. The sort of load I am
talking about is i
Is it possible to access the ERModern *Embedded* pages using an
ERDControllerButton?
Thanks Jürgen
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Upd
21 matches
Mail list logo
