Yeah, I had the same reaction when I was trying to get details on an unrelated
exception in Eclipse. You have to know what you are looking for now. :-)
I don't think it is 4.4.1, I use it in another context and it is very stable.
Chuck
On 2014-10-20, 7:58 PM, "Paul Hoadley" wrote:
On 21 Oct
On 21 Oct 2014, at 11:40 am, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Does the Error Log view give a stack trace for the exception?
I wondered where the log output was going. Err, short answer yes, something
seems to be going to the Error Log view, but the longer answer is that every
time I click on an entry in t
Hi Ted,
On 21 Oct 2014, at 11:53 am, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> I had this exact problem. What did you do with JRebel? did you remove it from
> the WOLips build?
Yes I removed it from the build. I don't have JRebel.
--
Paul Hoadley
http://logicsquad.net/
Paul,
I had this exact problem. What did you do with JRebel? did you remove it from
the WOLips build? I had a conversation with the JRebel people and they wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:05 PM EEST, ZT Support
>>> wrote:
Hi Theodore,
I'm Curtis, one of the engineers
Does the Error Log view give a stack trace for the exception?
On 2014-10-20, 6:07 PM, "Paul Hoadley" wrote:
On 19 Oct 2014, at 9:05 am, Paul Hoadley
mailto:pa...@logicsquad.net>> wrote:
On 19 Oct 2014, at 1:04 am, Gino Pacitti
mailto:ginok...@mac.com>> wrote:
I had to reinstall Luna and bui
On 19 Oct 2014, at 9:05 am, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2014, at 1:04 am, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>
>> I had to reinstall Luna and build WOLips again…
>>
>> Maybe there is a better way but it worked for me...
>
> Thanks Gino. It turned out that starting a new workspace from scratch and
> i
It's "POODLE", actually: "Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption."
http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.com/2014/10/this-poodle-bites-exploiting-ssl-30.html
And, you know what else? I hate that I know this. :-)
- Patrick
On Oct 20, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 201
Oh right...haha...I'm getting them all confused these days. :P Either way,
Apache 2.4 doesn't fix either. :)
-Lon
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> Le 2014-10-20 à 19:00, Lon Varscsak a écrit :
>
> > Shellshock was an SSLv3/v2 fallback problem (technically a client
> b
Le 2014-10-20 à 19:00, Lon Varscsak a écrit :
> Shellshock was an SSLv3/v2 fallback problem (technically a client
> bug)...upgrading Apache shouldn't resolve this (unless by default 2.4 turns
> off SSLv3/v2).
Shellshock is the bash security issue :-) The SSL fallback issue is called
POOTLE.
Shellshock was an SSLv3/v2 fallback problem (technically a client
bug)...upgrading Apache shouldn't resolve this (unless by default 2.4 turns
off SSLv3/v2).
-Lon
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Ray Kiddy wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:10:19 -0700
> Lon Varscsak wrote:
>
> > I just downgraded
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 14:10:19 -0700
Lon Varscsak wrote:
> I just downgraded and installed 2.2.26 using homebrew (and these
> instructions https://gist.github.com/falker/857c40ac854999d88135).
> Figured it was the path of least resistance. :P
>
> -Lon
So, I updated my apache instance in response
I just downgraded and installed 2.2.26 using homebrew (and these
instructions https://gist.github.com/falker/857c40ac854999d88135). Figured
it was the path of least resistance. :P
-Lon
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Michael Kondratov <
mich...@aspireauctions.com> wrote:
> I would also love to
+1
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 Oct 2014, at 22:10, Lon Varscsak wrote:
>
> I just downgraded and installed 2.2.26 using homebrew (and these instructions
> https://gist.github.com/falker/857c40ac854999d88135). Figured it was the
> path of least resistance. :P
>
> -Lon
>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 201
I must agree…. every time I’ve used flattened relationships, I eventually find
a reason to undo it.
For instance, a lot of my databases have a transID that represents a foreign
key relationship to a table that tracks the responsible party for each
transaction. Even though I may not add data to
Hi Markus,
The embedded blocks are part of ERMODEditRelationshipPage:
It probably won't be easy to extract this functionality. At least have your
static page extend ERD2WPage.
May I ask what your requirement is that prevents you from using a D2W page?
Most of the time
Correct! :-)
Flattening would only be useful if you wanted to logically have the
relationship:
Quote <<--->> Product
Since there is actual information in the QuotedProduct join table, you don’t
want to flatten.
Regards,
Mark
On Oct 20, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Flavio Donadio wrote:
> Hello, peopl
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:41:00 -0200
Flavio Donadio wrote:
> Hello, people!
>
> I am experimenting a little more... and hitting some roadblocks!
>
> Example: I have these entities called Product and Quote. A Quote has
> many products. But each quoted product has more information, like
> price, qu
Hello, people!
I am experimenting a little more... and hitting some roadblocks!
Example: I have these entities called Product and Quote. A Quote has many
products. But each quoted product has more information, like price, quantity
and lead time. So, I am using this QuotedProduct entity, which
I am working on a modern D2W application. Look at the enclosed screenshot. It
shows an example of what I want to achieve manually.
I want to open such an embedded editor (for create as well as inspect tasks)
from a hand crafted static page (there are some special requirements that
cannot be d
+1
Dr. Wo, his iPhone 6
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 12:28 PM, Michael Kondratov
> wrote:
>
> I would also love to get a copy of a binary. Tried compiling - no success.
>
> Michael Kondratov
> Aspire Auctions, Inc.
> 216-231-5515
>
>> On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>>
>> Hi all…
I would also love to get a copy of a binary. Tried compiling - no success.
Michael Kondratov
Aspire Auctions, Inc.
216-231-5515
> On Oct 20, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
>
> Hi all…
>
> Just updated to Yosemite and duh… Apache is updated and I cannot get WO to
> work…
> I have the ad
Paul and Gino,
I didn't face these problems because I was already creating a new workspace. I
had never really done anything worth keeping, so I just trashed everything and
started from scratch.
Glad to see my walk-through is working!
Cheers,
Flavio
On 18/10/2014, at 19:35, Paul Hoadley wr
Hi all…
Just updated to Yosemite and duh… Apache is updated and I cannot get WO to work…
I have the adaptor make file from wonder but not totally sure how to set it up
to compile. There is no make.postamble or make.config and I am not sure what to
use to configure if there were.
Is there a prec
23 matches
Mail list logo
