Hi Maik,
The snapshots are purged from the cache when an EC is disposed if no other EO
in another EC is still referencing them. That is, disposing will decrement the
reference count for the snapshot of the EOs in the EC. That should happen
automatically when the page is garbage collecting, as
Hi Dennis,
thanks for your suggestions.
Currently, I don't dispose of editing contexts explicitly. I had EOF errors a
few years ago when I used to have dispose() calls after the final
saveChanges(), so I stopped doing dispose(). (I don't recall the details.) I do
however create editing context
Hi Chuck,
of course it could be something other than garbage collection, but at this
point I'm pretty sure it's something related to memory, either GC, or snapshot
cache size, or something related.
I checked for all sorts of things that can occur at 5pm and didn't find any. In
fact the problem
> Le 2016-01-27 à 06:27, Andrus Adamchik a écrit :
>
>
>> On Jan 27, 2016, at 2:09 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> - using Jersey to build RESTful applications using WO and EOF
>>
>> Hum. I would be interested to see how it’s better than ERRest.
>
> And how it compares to LinkRest :)
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 2:09 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
>>
>> - using Jersey to build RESTful applications using WO and EOF
>
> Hum. I would be interested to see how it’s better than ERRest.
And how it compares to LinkRest :)
Andrus
___
Do not pos
> Le 2016-01-27 à 05:38, Dennis Bliefernicht
> a écrit :
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>> On 23.11.2015, at 16:07, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>> It's that time of the year! Yes, I need topics for WOWODC 2016. Having them,
>> even if it's not a complet list, before the end of the year would be great.
>
>
Hi everyone,
> On 23.11.2015, at 16:07, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> It's that time of the year! Yes, I need topics for WOWODC 2016. Having them,
> even if it's not a complet list, before the end of the year would be great.
We're still going through the possibilities here, there are a few ideas
f
Hi,
> On 26.01.2016, at 14:28, Musall Maik wrote:
>
> Anyway, heap sizes of up to 60 GByte are apparently not so common, at least
> not with WebObjects. I found a helpful article [1] about very large JVM
> heaps, including the hint to the Zing Azul JVM, which features a stopless
> garbage col
