Re: WOAdaptor build and test

2016-04-07 Thread Chuck Hill
Assuming you can access the app, yes. On 2016-04-07, 11:24 AM, "Paul Yu" wrote: >So if I’ve got it compiled and loaded into Apache 2.4 and apachectl -M shows >the module loaded then I should be fine? > >Paul > >> On Apr 7, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Chuck Hill

Re: WOAdaptor build and test

2016-04-07 Thread Paul Yu
So if I’ve got it compiled and loaded into Apache 2.4 and apachectl -M shows the module loaded then I should be fine? Paul > On Apr 7, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > Install it and use it to access the app. If it compiles, it is pretty much a > binary test,

Re: WOAdaptor build and test

2016-04-07 Thread Chuck Hill
Install it and use it to access the app. If it compiles, it is pretty much a binary test, either it crashes or it works fine. Try a file upload too. I don’t recall ever hearing of any “it mostly works except for this one edge case” bugs due to version updates. Chuck On 2016-04-07, 6:00

Re: Maven classpath ordering

2016-04-07 Thread T Worman
On another topic, I went with Mustache of StringTemplate specifically because of the KVC/getter issue. I shoulda probably dug deeper to override its behavior but I got lazy. :-) I’d love to see what you did there. Anyway, here was my original thread:

Re: WOAdaptor build and test

2016-04-07 Thread Paul Yu
Once I have the woadaptor built, how do I know that it is actually working by itself? Paul Sent from my iPad > On Apr 6, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > Testing? Seriously? :-P If it does not crash, it is tested. > > Look in the archives for these threads: >