+1
> On 4 Sep 2016, at 23:21, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
>
> JMHO but I think we should keep the money in the association, and we should
> promote the Kickstarter project.
>
> Put out an email every week to get everyone’s attention to sign up and put in
> some money. I’m ready!
>
>
>
>
>> On
Mark,
I discover some useful classes in the er.extensions.concurrency package inside
ERExtensions.
Bases on these my current pattern for background tasks is this:
ERXApplication._startRequest();
ec = ERXEC.newEditingContext(parentObjectStore);
try {
do the job without worrying about loc
Dear René,
Thank you. This is really helpful. I hadn’t spotted the screencast and will
check it out.
Mark
> On 5 Sep 2016, at 09:34, René Bock wrote:
>
> Hi Mark
>
>> Am 03.09.2016 um 22:36 schrieb Mark Wardle :
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I’m debugging a deadlock and realise that I probably nee
Hugi,
Thank you. It works!
Mark
> On 4 Sep 2016, at 23:16, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>
> You probably need to open the Eclipse .project-file in your project and add:
>
> org.maven.ide.eclipse.maven2Nature
>
> …as a project nature (inside the “natures"-tag).
>
> WebObjects uses this identifier t
Oh come on, Theodore—you just cost me a thousand bucks! :)
But seriously, I agree the community should hold on to its funds for the
conferences. I’m not sure Maven by itself is a large enough subject to warrant
a Kickstarter, but I’ve been wanting to do a more complete “Modern WebObjects”
proje
Hi Mark
> Am 03.09.2016 um 22:36 schrieb Mark Wardle :
>
> Dear all,
>
> I’m debugging a deadlock and realise that I probably need to re-design some
> of my code logic.
>
> Am I right in saying…
>
> 1. For a background thread, it is appropriate to create a new editing context
> (ERXEC.newEdi
