Re: Going out of the community

2016-10-11 Thread Paul Hoadley
On 7 Oct 2016, at 9:14 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > Thanks for all your support over the years, and I do hope to see you again > sometime, Thanks for all your work Pascal. It’s been much appreciated far and wide. -- Paul Hoadley http://logicsquad.net/ _

Re: Going out of the community

2016-10-11 Thread Ken Anderson
Pascal, Thank you for all you’ve done! It would not have been the same without you. Even if you’re not present at the next WOWODC in Montreal, hopefully you’ll join us for dinner! Ken > On Oct 6, 2016, at 6:44 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > In the events in my life in the

Re: Maven migration: last two hurdles

2016-10-11 Thread Paul Hoadley
On 12 Oct 2016, at 8:55 AM, Faizel Dakri wrote: > Regarding your second issue, I also keep my components grouped in subfolders > and I was never able to find an automated way to flatten just the components > subfolders. I ended up having to explicitly exclude all subfolders under > src/main/co

Re: Going out of the community

2016-10-11 Thread Faizel Dakri
Pascal, Thanks for all of your efforts over the years. I am glad that I was finally able to make it to WOWODC this year and meet you in person. I hope you do take some time and start enjoying life—you deserve it. All the best to you and whatever you embark on next. F -- Faizel Dakri list...@

Re: Maven migration: last two hurdles

2016-10-11 Thread Faizel Dakri
Regarding your second issue, I also keep my components grouped in subfolders and I was never able to find an automated way to flatten just the components subfolders. I ended up having to explicitly exclude all subfolders under src/main/components and then add each subfolder as a resource directo

Re: WORedirect with a known MIME type?

2016-10-11 Thread OC
Samuel and all others, thanks a lot! On 10. 10. 2016, at 22:39, Samuel Pelletier wrote: > The mime type of the final file is sent by the final web server. The redirect > simply tell the browser to get the content elsewhere and does not define it's > type. That's in other words what I asked f