Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

Hi all I dont’ build wonder myself and I still use ant for old projects even if maven works great. if it helps and save time maintaining wonder… yes please, show us the way and move to maven. Have a nice day, Jérémy > Le 17 juin 2022 à 03:14, Ray Kiddy via Webobjects-dev > a écrit : >

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

It has been getting harder and harder to build Wonder with ant. The last time I had to, I ended up not bothering to finish the build. Life is too short. Yes, I am still using ant in my own apps, but that is different. So, my vote is: Make it so. cheers - ray On 6/16/22 17:05, Paul

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

> (and if you're using the builds from jenkins.wocommunity.org > , you're already using the maven built > frameworks). So… This was a blatant lie on my behalf (would love some recipes for crow right now). Jenkins currently uses the ant build. But Maven in

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

I also support this proposal. Thanks for maintaining and improving wonder Henrique et al. Tim On 17/6/22 09:58, Paul Hoadley via Webobjects-dev wrote: On 17 Jun 2022, at 08:12, Henrique Prange via Webobjects-dev wrote: What do you think? I fully support this proposal. -- Paul Hoadley

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

Hey Ted, Already answered, but just for additional reassurance: On 17 Jun 2022, at 08:17, Theodore Petrosky via Webobjects-dev wrote: > What about us guys whose projects are smallish projects and never instituted > Maven... It won't affect your projects! This is purely about building the

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

On 17 Jun 2022, at 08:12, Henrique Prange via Webobjects-dev wrote: > What do you think? I fully support this proposal. -- Paul Hoadley https://logicsquad.net/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/ ___ Do not post admin requests to the

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

Hi Ted, Thanks for your feedback. > On 16 Jun 2022, at 19:47, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > > What about us guys whose projects are smallish projects and never instituted > Maven... We don't mean to cause any harm to existing users. However, supporting two build systems in Wonder slows down

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

Thanks for raising the issue Henrique! It probably comes as no surprise that I support this :). Ted; just to clarify, this proposal only applies to the building of Wonder itself. Wonder's maven build generates artifacts/bundles that can be consumed by Ant applications, so nothing changes in

Re: [Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

What about us guys whose projects are smallish projects and never instituted Maven... Riddle me this how are the docs or examples on the Wiki to implement Maven? Can you point me to some good references so I can come on board? Ted On 6/16/22, 6:42 PM, "Henrique Prange via

[Proposal] Drop Wonder's Ant Build

Hey guys, I've been talking to other Wonder users/committers lately. Keeping the Ant build configuration up to date in Wonder is becoming increasingly counterproductive. Most of us have been using Maven for years. As a result, our environments are not prepared to build the project with Ant,