Re: The WOCommunity slack channel

2016-09-29 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
Please add me to! Best, M. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:38 AM, jens schulze wrote: > Please add me too: > > jens.schu...@me.com > > jens > > ** > *Prof. Dr. Jens Schulze* > *Marketing & Vertrieb* > Münsterstrasse 265 www.profjens.de >

Re: State of Windows deployment in 2009?

2009-11-24 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
Apple listens to Apple. Im not sure how much they care about WO developers right now, come on! just looking at wwdc talks you can get the feeling wo is not an important thin for Apple right now (at least wo developers outside Apple labs). My 2 cents. kind regards, Martin. On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 a

Re: State of Windows deployment in 2009?

2009-11-24 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
eciates in value because interest rates are so low and > inflation is high. Or they can give it to Uncle Sam in the form of taxes. > > Why not spend a little bit a money on WO? They are going to lose the money > anyway. > > Johnny > An AAPL Shareholder > > On Nov 24, 2

Re: State of Windows deployment in 2009?

2009-11-24 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
I believe it is a great thing that a wo oriented conference exists (no mater if it is because apple dropped wo sessions), but I also feel that would be nice if Apple as the 'owner' of WO showed some interest on it. I feel sometimes I invest a lot of energy on something that has a blury future, an

Re: State of Windows deployment in 2009?

2009-11-25 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
after all the wording here I see no clear future and what is worse I dont see how to support the idea of selling wo developments to clients if Apple continues to give no signs of wo survival. After all I have the feeling I will end up developing in spring+hibernate+wicket (already started as a saf

Re: Virtual Appliances

2010-02-16 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
Seems useful for me. But if development is not done in Apple hardware I believe is not allowes by the WO license. On 16/2/10 7:00 PM, "Don Lindsay" wrote: > Hello; > > I have created two virtual appliances that I use for WebObjects > development. I was wondering if they would be of interest

Re: Virtual Appliances

2010-02-16 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
ing they need to fully understand the license > before proceeding. > > Thanks > > Don > On Feb 16, 2010, at 5:11 PM, Martin Perez Barreiro wrote: > >> Seems useful for me. But if development is not done in Apple >> hardware I >> believe is not allowes by the

Re: WebObjects training

2010-03-15 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
Apple Docs + joshua marker¹s book + Chuck´s book. At least worked for me. (I had no other option, there is barely nothing wo related in Argentina) Martin. On 15/3/10 5:14 PM, "Lon Varscsak" wrote: > Hey all, I'm looking for some training for one of our employees and don't know > where to lo

Re: App not starting in deployment

2010-10-28 Thread Martin Perez Barreiro
Jean, The problem is that you compiled with a compiler a version (at least) above the runtime jre. You will need to match the development jdk and target jre versions, or have target jre with a version number superior to dev jdk and not the other way arround. Hope it helps, M. On 27/10/20