post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>> http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net
>
Just solved a problem that's I've been banging my head against.
PROBLEM: The resource manager is leaving off the Contents component of the name
when loading the resources into memory. For the most part everything will
function fine unless you have static files in the WebServerResources. The
pr
Has anyone discovered what would be causing the loss of the Contents/ entry for
images. I had an app where this was working fine and just started it again to
find my component images all having bad links.
> We are getting URLs like /app.woa/WebServerResources/... when we
> expect
> (and h
Good to know and looks like it might fix my problem. Except that
MySQL doesn't support WO's syntax for outer joins. Looks like it's
another point for switching to postgreSQL, maybe later though.
Switching over now would be a bit of a headache.
I also still think it should be classified as a
Having a little trouble with this one, its only what I can assume is
a bug.
I have two EOQualifiers, say A and B.
If I search the database with A I get objects a and b.
If I search the database with B I get the object c.
If I search with an EOOrQualifier generated from A and B I get only
ob
Try turning off the IPv6 networking stack if possible. Most likely
they aren't using it.
I think the libraries assume all addresses are 4 bytes so that's
why you get an error that doesn't make much sense.
Hallo,
I have a linux machine where a WO App is to be deployed at a
customers (beh
Careful with the Application.host() call. It can rely on the
underlying operating system's sense of identity. Therefor its not
always a complete domain name, i.e. you'll occasionally get "www"
instead of "www.foobar.com".
In addition its returning the name of the computer the WebObjects
A
Do you actually have any 1.5 specific code in the client application or are you
compiling it as 1.5 only? Currently the JavaClient WebStart only asks the
client for a 1.4+ JVM. I found out that the errors are very unusual when some
JVM's try to run a 1.5 binary after being told it's a 1.4 versio
I've recently done something similar. I believe the correct way to do what you propose is to create a subclass of EOApplication. Make sure you have the function:protected void finishInitialization() { super.finishInitialization(); // call your startup code}Bind this new subclass to applic
