Hi Lachlan
Sure you did and I read that too :)
Cheers
Cheong Hee
- Original Message -
From: "Lachlan Deck"
To: "Cheong Hee (Gmail)"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: ^ binding syntax usage
Hi Cheong,
the WOComponent file spec wasn't
Hi Cheong,
the WOComponent file spec wasn't at issue for me, but how WO resolves the java
class for it when it is not in the default java package.
I've solved it as mentioned.
Lachlan Deck
lachlan.d...@gmail.com
On 22/07/2011, at 7:50 PM, Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
> Hi Lachlan
>
> Deos this s
Don't you see the warning icon right in front? :)
- Original Message -
From: "Amy Worrall"
To:
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: ^ binding syntax usage
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Cheong Hee (Gmail)
wrote:
Hi Lachlan
Deos this serve the pu
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Cheong Hee (Gmail) wrote:
> Hi Lachlan
>
> Deos this serve the purpose?
>
That document is teasing us:
"Apple reserves the right to modify the syntax and behavior of parsing
the WOComponent HTML file format in future releases."
Future releases? :P
___
quot;
To: "webobjects-dev Development"
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 3:26 AM
Subject: ^ binding syntax usage
Hi there,
anyone remember when the '^' was introduced for component bindings and
where the official docs are for it?
I'm obviously a little rusty on its usage as I can&#x
On 22/07/2011, at 6:45 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I think that is only needed for Main and only when you have something else on
> your classpath with a Main class.
I found that it couldn't resolve MainWrapper class without this, at least in
development. If that doesn't happen for you then possibly
I think that is only needed for Main and only when you have something else on
your classpath with a Main class.
On 2011-07-21, at 1:40 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> On 22/07/2011, at 5:38 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> So I've forgotten how to help WO resolve component classes that aren't in
>> the d
On 22/07/2011, at 5:38 AM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> So I've forgotten how to help WO resolve component classes that aren't in the
> default package. How do you do this nowadays?
@Override
public void installPatches() {
super.installPatches();
ERXPatcher.setClassForName(Main.class, "
The syntax is correct, I've used it many times. The setup you describe also
looks good to me. Can you double-check that what you're doing IRL is the same
as what you describe below?
Timo
Am 21.07.2011 um 21:26 schrieb Lachlan Deck:
> Hi there,
>
> anyone remember when the '^' was introduced
Hey Chuck,
On 22/07/2011, at 5:30 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On 2011-07-21, at 12:26 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> anyone remember when the '^' was introduced for component bindings and where
>> the official docs are for it?
>
> A very long time ago, it was in the printed WO docs
On 2011-07-21, at 12:26 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> anyone remember when the '^' was introduced for component bindings and where
> the official docs are for it?
A very long time ago, it was in the printed WO docs from Apple if you remember
that far back. :-)
I have never used it
Hi there,
anyone remember when the '^' was introduced for component bindings and where
the official docs are for it?
I'm obviously a little rusty on its usage as I can't make it work.
e.g.,
MainWrapper.wo:
<...>
Main.wo:
<...>
UnknownKeyException: [ takeValueForKey()]: at
12 matches
Mail list logo
