On 2010-11-18, at 3:09 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> It's hard to describe so I attached is a screen shot. I have several sort
> fields, a system for changing views (table, single, grid), pagination, a
> custom search field. On top of that I have a system of filters (left hand
> side) that inte
I think you need to bind it to a variable.
On Nov 18, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> I tried adding a wohiddenfield with a static string value but it doesn't seem
> to work. Do I need to update it somehow?
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> That is an old
I've decided I'm just going to cheat and use an update link that looks like a
checkbox.
On Nov 18, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> That is an old HTML problem. Unchecked boxes submit nothing. If the form
> has only check boxes, nothing is submitted. Add a WOHiddenField to the form.
>
I tried adding a wohiddenfield with a static string value but it doesn't seem
to work. Do I need to update it somehow?
On Nov 18, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> That is an old HTML problem. Unchecked boxes submit nothing. If the form
> has only check boxes, nothing is submitted. Add
That is an old HTML problem. Unchecked boxes submit nothing. If the form has
only check boxes, nothing is submitted. Add a WOHiddenField to the form.
On Nov 18, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Well, I'm getting closer :p
>
> I had evalScripts set to false and that was killing the s
Well, I'm getting closer :p
I had evalScripts set to false and that was killing the second update.
However, for some odd reason my cover method only gets called if I check the
box to on. When checked to off it does an ajax update but the cover method
doesn't get called?
Thanks,
Johnny
On N
Do you have the whole thing in a WOForm?
WOForm
AjaxObserveField
WORepetition
tb
On Nov 18, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> I'm getting a little confused on the wording in the JavaDocs.
>
> Here is my component layout
>
> ... updateContainerID="SomeId">
>
> I think that's righ
I'm getting a little confused on the wording in the JavaDocs.
Here is my component layout
...
I think that's right but I'm getting the error where only the first update gets
triggered. Do you know what I'm missing?
Thanks,
Johnny
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Travis Britt wrote:
> Yep. It
Yep. It will observe whatever it's wrapping.
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/hudson/job/Wonder54/javadoc/er/ajax/AjaxObserveField.html
On Nov 18, 2010, at 3:01 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Would I just use the updatecontainerid and not the observefieldid?
>
> thanks a lot,
>
> Johnny
>
> On N
It could do it, but may be more trouble than it is worth at this point. Some
of that would be a PITA.
On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> It's hard to describe so I attached is a screen shot. I have several sort
> fields, a system for changing views (table, single, grid), p
There is CSS. What sort of control do you want?
Chuck
On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Aesthetics, in this case, are very important. Do you get full control of the
> UI with AjaxGrid?
>
> thanks,
>
> Johnny
>
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>>
Would I just use the updatecontainerid and not the observefieldid?
thanks a lot,
Johnny
On Nov 18, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Travis Britt wrote:
> You could wrap the WORepetition in an AjaxObserveField and it will watch all
> the checkboxes.
>
> tb
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Johnny Miller wrot
Aesthetics, in this case, are very important. Do you get full control of the
UI with AjaxGrid?
thanks,
Johnny
On Nov 18, 2010, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Uh, that is what AjaxGrid does. Why re-invent it? Everything you want is
> already there.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> On Nov 18, 2010, at
Uh, that is what AjaxGrid does. Why re-invent it? Everything you want is
already there.
Chuck
On Nov 18, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a display group that I'm paginating through using ajax update links.
> Each of the objects has a checkbox whose state I want to
You could wrap the WORepetition in an AjaxObserveField and it will watch all
the checkboxes.
tb
On Nov 18, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a display group that I'm paginating through using ajax update links.
> Each of the objects has a checkbox whose state I want to r
Hi,
I have a display group that I'm paginating through using ajax update links.
Each of the objects has a checkbox whose state I want to record between
paginations.
Should I use an ajax observe field per checkbox or wrap each checkbox in an
ajax submit form or is there a better way? I guess
16 matches
Mail list logo
