Le 2010-11-16 à 11:11, Michael Gargano a écrit :
> This actually brings me to a question I've been "wonder"-ing about
>
> Do I need to use WOInstaller.jar to install the base frameworks or do I
> just need a script to create the directory structure and embed all the
> frameworks into
This actually brings me to a question I've been "wonder"-ing about
Do I need to use WOInstaller.jar to install the base frameworks or do I
just need a script to create the directory structure and embed all the
frameworks into my apps?
If so, which directories need to be creat
On 16/11/2010, at 6:44 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
> ON a related subject, can I mix Wonder JavaMonitor/WOTaskd with Apple's
> versions? .. or more specifically, can I replace the single JavaMonitor
> app and leave all the wotaskds on all the servers intact in one cluster of
> machines?
I d
There are piles of free/opensource tools out there nowadays for network
monitoring. I've just gone through the process of evaluating again for a small
ISP and we settled on a mix of solutions, the two I would recommend for doing
something like 'connect to port 80 and verify response HTML contai
Ah OK, well then it is worth updating wotaskd too while I am at it I guess.
Thanks, Kieran
On Nov 15, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
> That's a good question. I think it should work, but you lost the "make a
> backup of the config" feature of Wonder's wotaskd.
>
> ON a related subject,
That's a good question. I think it should work, but you lost the "make a
backup of the config" feature of Wonder's wotaskd.
ON a related subject, can I mix Wonder JavaMonitor/WOTaskd with Apple's
> versions? .. or more specifically, can I replace the single JavaMonitor
> app and leave all the
AFAIK, the only wotaskd changes were bug fixes. So, yes.
Chuck
On Nov 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
> ON a related subject, can I mix Wonder JavaMonitor/WOTaskd with Apple's
> versions? .. or more specifically, can I replace the single JavaMonitor
> app and leave all the
ON a related subject, can I mix Wonder JavaMonitor/WOTaskd with Apple's
versions? .. or more specifically, can I replace the single JavaMonitor app
and leave all the wotaskds on all the servers intact in one cluster of machines?
Regards, Kieran
On Nov 15, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
Hi Greg;
We just had an issue with our WebObjects application becoming
unresponsive on our new production server (a Mac Mini of course!). The
It is probably a good idea is to get a stack trace of your
"unresponsive" application to see what all of the threads are doing and
really diagnose th
2010/11/15 Chuck Hill
> On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
>
> > Thanks Pascal and Chuck
> > (Pascal won the race to reply by a minute and 26 seconds ! Chuck, Chuck,
> you're slowing down ... :)
>
> I went to pour a cup of coffee. I need a coffee machine next to my
> computers!
On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
> Thanks Pascal and Chuck
> (Pascal won the race to reply by a minute and 26 seconds ! Chuck, Chuck,
> you're slowing down ... :)
I went to pour a cup of coffee. I need a coffee machine next to my computers!
>
> --
> Valerio Luccio
Thanks Pascal and Chuck
(Pascal won the race to reply by a minute and 26 seconds ! Chuck,
Chuck, you're slowing down ... :)
--
Valerio Luccio (212) 998-8736
Center for Brain Imaging4 Washington Place, Room 156
New York University New York, NY 10003
On Nov 15, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
> Pascal Robert wrote:
>> Yes, the SiteConfig.xml is the same. Usually, I put the Wonder versions in
>> /Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications (or
>> /opt/Local/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications if it's on Linux) and I
>> change the startup s
Le 2010-11-15 à 13:39, Valerio Luccio a écrit :
> Pascal Robert wrote:
>> Yes, the SiteConfig.xml is the same. Usually, I put the Wonder versions in
>> /Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications (or
>> /opt/Local/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications if it's on Linux) and I
>> change the startup scrip
Pascal Robert wrote:
Yes, the SiteConfig.xml is the same. Usually, I put the Wonder
versions in /Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications (or
/opt/Local/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications if it's on Linux) and I
change the startup scripts for wotaskd and JavaMonitor to use the
Wonder versions. We
Yes, the SiteConfig.xml is the same. Usually, I put the Wonder versions in
/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications (or
/opt/Local/Library/WebObjects/JavaApplications if it's on Linux) and I change
the startup scripts for wotaskd and JavaMonitor to use the Wonder versions. We
are running the Wonder
Interesting...that's sort of what I was looking for. Is it pretty
straightforward to migrate from the standard JavaMonitor and wotaskd to the
Project Wonder versions? We haven't been using them so far. Thanks very
much for the help!
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>
> L
Le 2010-11-15 à 11:11, Greg Lappen a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> We just had an issue with our WebObjects application becoming unresponsive on
> our new production server (a Mac Mini of course!). The java process was
> running, but not even our login page would show up - we got the "No instance
>
Hi all,
We just had an issue with our WebObjects application becoming unresponsive
on our new production server (a Mac Mini of course!). The java process was
running, but not even our login page would show up - we got the "No instance
available" message from mod_webobjects.
What I'd like to do i
19 matches
Mail list logo
