Re: Best Way to communicate with Tomcat

2006-05-17 Thread Mike Schrag
Having a second server running doesn't seem like it would effect EFFICIENCY ... From my experience, I would say SOAP is EASIER than RMI for the reasons he listed, but more efficient? Not sure about that. Binary serialization from an over-the-wire standpoint is going to be WAY smaller than

Re: Best Way to communicate with Tomcat

2006-05-17 Thread Philippe Lafoucrière
On 16 mai 06, at 22:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Philippe; Perhaps you could expand on what you mean by "interconnect" as this is like saying you want to build a bridge without specifiying if it's for two cars a day, for or a motorway or for rail. In each case it would be a differ

RE: Best Way to communicate with Tomcat

2006-05-16 Thread apl
Hello Philippe; Perhaps you could expand on what you mean by "interconnect" as this is like saying you want to build a bridge without specifiying if it's for two cars a day, for or a motorway or for rail. In each case it would be a different sort of bridge you would want. cheers. I wond

Best Way to communicate with Tomcat

2006-05-16 Thread Philippe Lafoucrière
Hello, I wonder what would be the best way to interconnect some webobjects servers with a tomcat one. I'm thinking of several solutions (SOAP/WSDL, RMI, JMS, etc.), but what are respective performances of this solutions ? Thank you by advance, Philippe