Re: Bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed() when using query dictionary

2006-05-02 Thread Nathan Hadfield
(I wrote this Friday but just realized I failed to include the listserv in my reply.) Thanks so much for the quick replies, and sorry to bring up an old debate. My bad for not searching the archives well enough. In my case I was generating the URL for use in a plain-text e-mail, so

Bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed() when using query dictionary

2006-04-26 Thread Nathan Hadfield
I seem to have encountered a bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed(). When I pass it a query dictionary containing more than one key, it returns a string in which the query arguments are separted by 'amp;' instead of just an ampersand. As a result, if I pass a query dictionary

Re: Bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed() when using query dictionary

2006-04-26 Thread Chuck Hill
Not really sure I want to step into this... :-) On Apr 26, 2006, at 3:49 PM, Nathan Hadfield wrote: I seem to have encountered a bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed(). When I pass it a query dictionary containing more than one key, it returns a string in which the query

Re: Bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed() when using query dictionary

2006-04-26 Thread Mike Schrag
David LeBer, Nov 15 2005 says a quick Mail search ... This teeters on a religious debate I believe :) It comes down to how you are using the result of that method. If you use it inside of an a href = .. then it's SUPPOSED to be escaped (to be XHTML compliant). However, apparently it

Re: Bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed() when using query dictionary

2006-04-26 Thread Chuck Hill
On Apr 26, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: So basically, if you were expecting it the old way, it's broken, but if you thought it was broken before, it's fixed :) ROFL! -- Coming in late 2006 - an introduction to web applications using WebObjects and Xcode

Re: Bug in WOContext.directActionURLForActionNamed() when using query dictionary

2006-04-26 Thread David LeBer
On 26-Apr-06, at 8:32 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: David LeBer, Nov 15 2005 says a quick Mail search ... This teeters on a religious debate I believe :) It comes down to how you are using the result of that method. If you use it inside of an a href = .. then it's SUPPOSED to be escaped (to be