Jesse,
> On 29. 5. 2020, at 3:15 PM, Jesse Tayler wrote:
> Well, I don’t know but I think the fact you’d be having this problem points
> to another problem.
Perhaps it does, but frankly, I can't see that.
> I don’t know your traffic or architecture, but you really should not have
> that
Well, I don’t know but I think the fact you’d be having this problem points to
another problem.
I don’t know your traffic or architecture, but you really should not have that
problem at all, I wonder if perhaps you are creating too many separate ECs?
I find myself generally putting the bulk of
Hi there,
just again, I've been bit in my tender parts by the well-known problem that
1. thread A locks its EC
2. thread B saves some change into DB
3. thread A saves its own changes (of different properties), which alas as a
side-effect also reverts B's changes ...
... since A's EC still
