Re: ERModernDirectToWeb Formatter Bug?

2010-09-09 Thread David Avendasora
Whew. I was wondering if I'm the only person living out on the edge of Head... Thanks Non-Dave! Dave On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote: > Committed. I noticed this yesterday too. D2WDisplayNumber didn't like it. > > Ramsey > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 5:58 AM, David Avendasora w

Re: ERModernDirectToWeb Formatter Bug?

2010-09-09 Thread David LeBer
On 2010-09-09, at 5:58 AM, David Avendasora wrote: > Hi all, mostly David LeBer, > > I see that a little over a week ago David LB added the following rule: > > 40 : *true* => formatter = %Y-%m-%d > [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment], > > And now any number field that doesn't have a hi

Re: ERModernDirectToWeb Formatter Bug?

2010-09-09 Thread Ramsey Lee Gurley
Committed. I noticed this yesterday too. D2WDisplayNumber didn't like it. Ramsey On Sep 9, 2010, at 5:58 AM, David Avendasora wrote: > Hi all, mostly David LeBer, > > I see that a little over a week ago David LB added the following rule: > > 40 : *true* => formatter = %Y-%m-%d > [com.we

ERModernDirectToWeb Formatter Bug?

2010-09-09 Thread David Avendasora
Hi all, mostly David LeBer, I see that a little over a week ago David LB added the following rule: 40 : *true* => formatter = %Y-%m-%d [com.webobjects.directtoweb.Assignment], And now any number field that doesn't have a higher priority formatter rule on it fails with: IllegalArgumentExcep