Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-26 Thread T Worman
On Jul 26, 2016, at 6:56 AM, Samuel Pelletier wrote: > > Hi Tim, > >> >> 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is NOT opt-in. >> :-) > > I also don’t understand “is NOT opt-in”. To use this, I have to change > the prototype of the id column from id

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-26 Thread Samuel Pelletier
Hi Tim, > > 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is NOT opt-in. > :-) I also don’t understand “is NOT opt-in”. To use this, I have to change the prototype of the id column from id to uuid. Of course the migration has to be fixed by ha

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread Paul Hoadley
Hi Tim, On 26 Jul 2016, at 11:34 AM, T Worman wrote: >> If you’ve observed a change that you haven’t opted in for, then it could be >> a bug. Could you describe it all more fully, and open a GitHub issue? > > Issue #1 was addressed by a subsequent patch which checks for a null > prototypeName

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread T Worman
On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On 26 Jul 2016, at 10:55 AM, T Worman > wrote: > >>> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Theodore Petrosky >> > wrote: >>> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:03 PM, T Worman >>>

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread Paul Hoadley
Hi Tim, On 26 Jul 2016, at 10:55 AM, T Worman wrote: >> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Theodore Petrosky > > wrote: >> >>> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:03 PM, T Worman >> > wrote: >>> >>> 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is N

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread T Worman
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote: > > On 26 Jul 2016, at 10:47 AM, T Worman wrote: >> >> On Jul 25, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tim, >>> >>> On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:33 AM, T Worman wrote: >>> 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread T Worman
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:03 PM, Theodore Petrosky wrote: > > >> On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:03 PM, T Worman > > wrote: >> >> 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is NOT opt-in. :-) > > I also don’t understand “is NOT opt-in”. To use this, I have to cha

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread Paul Hoadley
On 26 Jul 2016, at 10:47 AM, T Worman wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote: >> >> Hi Tim, >> >> On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:33 AM, T Worman wrote: >> >>> 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is NOT opt-in. :-) >> >> Could you explain this observation a bi

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread T Worman
On Jul 25, 2016, at 4:13 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:33 AM, T Worman wrote: > >> 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is NOT opt-in. :-) > > Could you explain this observation a bit further? Sorry, that was just me being sarcastic about w

Re: ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread Paul Hoadley
Hi Tim, On 26 Jul 2016, at 7:33 AM, T Worman wrote: > 1. The new (and very cool) UUID stuff in ERXGenericRecord is NOT opt-in. :-) Could you explain this observation a bit further? -- Paul Hoadley http://logicsquad.net/ ___ Do not post admin r

ERXGenericRecord and UUID's

2016-07-25 Thread T Worman
So, I deployed a new version of my app today which was based on Wonder 7. Apparently, I had a version of Wonder 7 that was more than 25 days old because I hit a fun bug in ERXGenericRecord.createUuidPrimaryKey. This bug has definitely been fixed. But I was surprised by a couple things: 1. The n