Hi Dennis,
Yes, this is true.
Best Regards
Cail
On Feb 1, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:
Is it true that the electronic licenses for Version 4 are the same
as those for Version 5? Thanks.
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems,
Besides, FrontBase just plain rocks. It does nothing besides just being there
and working exactly as it should.
- hugi
On 1.2.2010, at 19:17, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Resurrecting the "Is FrontBase Dead?!!?" thread...
>
> I reported a rather minor bug in 4.x last Friday. It was fixed as of Mon
Is it true that the electronic licenses for Version 4 are the same as those for
Version 5? Thanks.
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
On 2010-02-01, at 11:17 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Resurrecting the "Is FrontBase Dead?!!?" thread...
>
> I
Resurrecting the "Is FrontBase Dead?!!?" thread...
I reported a rather minor bug in 4.x last Friday. It was fixed as of
Monday morning and they gave me a patched version to download.
They are definitely still very much in the game, they've just been busy.
Chuck
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:55 A
To: Chuck Hill
Cc: WebObjectsDev Development
Subject: Re: FrontBase 5
That sounds like a Chuck Norris fact :-P
> Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>
>> I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBa
grumble
On Jan 8, 2010, at 3:08 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Chunk Hill wrote:
Hi George,
Did you notice much of a change in performance?
Between which?
64-bit vs 32-bit or Chunk Hill vs Chuck Noris?
Dave
Cheers,
Chunk
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:38 PM, George
Yes, but it's hard to know where all the new performance is coming from, since
we have OpenBase running on 2 new Xserves.
Since OpenBase was already memory intensive, going to 64bit removes it's
previous ceiling on memory — which was very important to us as our demand and
overall DB size is gro
On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:32 AM, Chunk Hill wrote:
> Hi George,
>
> Did you notice much of a change in performance?
Between which?
64-bit vs 32-bit or Chunk Hill vs Chuck Noris?
Dave
>
> Cheers,
> Chunk
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:38 PM, George Domurot wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth... We p
Hi George,
Did you notice much of a change in performance?
Cheers,
Chuck
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:38 PM, George Domurot wrote:
For what it's worth... We put OpenBase 64bit into production last
month. It's quite nice. I think it gets a public release soon.
-George
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:03 PM
Fact: Chuck Hill is smarter than Chuck Norris.
:-P
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:03 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
That sounds like a Chuck Norris fact :-P
Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in Front
That sounds like a Chuck Norris fact :-P
Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBase
when Chuck was vehemently attacking MySQL a while back ;-)
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Mike Schr
For what it's worth... We put OpenBase 64bit into production last month. It's
quite nice. I think it gets a public release soon.
-George
On Jan 7, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
>
>> I just wi
Chuck knew that 5 was coming out.
On Jan 7, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBase
when Chuck was vehemently attacking MySQL a while back ;-)
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Geert said it's been in producti
I just wish I had know about the lack of 64-bit intel in FrontBase
when Chuck was vehemently attacking MySQL a while back ;-)
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Geert said it's been in production use with one of their customers
since July ... So it's not really a .0 release.
ms
Geert said it's been in production use with one of their customers since July
... So it's not really a .0 release.
ms
On Jan 7, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:
> Hi Cail,
>
> Thank you. This is great!
>
> Is it stable enough for upgrading our large scale deployments?
>
>
Hi Cail,
Thank you. This is great!
Is it stable enough for upgrading our large scale deployments?
Or is it still going to be a dot zero release for a while.
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
Chief Technology Officer,
WEBAPPZ® Systems, Inc.
This message contains confidential information a
Hi Dennis,
I can confirm that FB5 does support Intel 64 bit.
-Cail
On Jan 7, 2010, at 7:50 PM, Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists wrote:
Hopefully, it will be "Intel (64 bit)"!!!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
On 2010-01-07, at 7:26 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
:-)
On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55,
Hopefully, it will be "Intel (64 bit)"!!!
With Kind Regards,
Dennis Gaastra,
On 2010-01-07, at 7:26 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
> :-)
>
> On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Just got an email from Geert at FrontBase that FB5 should be out in a week
>> or two ... So, FB lives
:-)
On 07/gen/2010, at 13.55, Mike Schrag wrote:
> Just got an email from Geert at FrontBase that FB5 should be out in a week or
> two ... So, FB lives :)
>
> ms
> ___
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev ma
Just got an email from Geert at FrontBase that FB5 should be out in a week or
two ... So, FB lives :)
ms
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscrib
20 matches
Mail list logo
