Hi scanned the page and one of the first thing that my eyes catched:
/>
really awesome :-) Is it really worthwhile to read further? ;-)
This is from the VS2008 page, right? I'm not saying the ASP.net
inside of it is pretty :) But the things the IDE does are pretty
impressive.
ms
__
Hi scanned the page and one of the first thing that my eyes catched:
/>
really awesome :-) Is it really worthwhile to read further? ;-)
Oliver
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They
Hello;
With WebObjects and WOLips you do not have to write all your java
code. Java Code in most database applications has to do with
retrieving, updating, inserting, and deleting data. WebObjects does
all this for you.
The HTML files in your component can be edited with any html edi
On 17.05.2008, at 18:40, Chuck Hill wrote:
HEY! It's weekend, it's 29 degrees and even sunny in Vancouver. Go,
grab a beer, grill a steak and hug your wife! That's what I'm going
to do now (No, I'll hug MY wife!).
I think that Nok will be disappointed.
And as I don't want that, I'll inclu
Hello;
I tried Netbeans and Visual Web on a test project. The interface in
Netbeans is very tweaky and crashes constantly. I never made it
though the whole project befroe I threw my hands in the air.
WebObjects is more mature faster and less of a resource hog in my
experience.
Don
On
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI
and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
I'm not sure what you're looking to compare -- WO + Eclipse/WOLips to
JSF + NetBeans or just the IDE features of Eclipse/WOLips to the IDE
feature
On May 17, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
On 17.05.2008, at 18:22, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Ken Foust wrote:
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the
GUI and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
W
On 17.05.2008, at 18:22, Chuck Hill wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Ken Foust wrote:
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI
and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
WOLips support WebObjects.
NetBeans supports shite.
Yo
On May 17, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Ken Foust wrote:
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI
and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
WOLips support WebObjects.
NetBeans supports shite.
Your choice.
Chuck
--
Practical WebObjects
On 17.05.2008, at 16:47, Ken Foust wrote:
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI
and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
Why? You really think a Java Beans / JSF environment will become a WO
replacement for people here? Ugh
This seems to take a shot at replacing Apple's WO as it has the GUI
and self coding features.
Please give me your comparative thoughts to WOlips
thanks ken
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
