Hi
Ok... can you see the difference between "PostgresqlPlugin" and
"PostgresqlPlugIn"? A whole day lost with this. Please insult me,
kick me, bash me while I'm killing myself. I'm so happy.
G!
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2006/06/22, at 15:28, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
I create
Hi!
On 2006/06/22, at 18:21, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
On 2006/06/22, at 17:35, Chuck Hill wrote:
Not related to your problem, but it is a best practice to set the
connection dictionary in code when having models in reusable
frameworks. Here is one way to do this (straight from Google):
htt
Hi!
I'm using Eclipse, so it's not that problem.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2006/06/22, at 20:13, Art Isbell wrote:
On Jun 22, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Obviously, I have included the PostgresqlPlugin framework, both
in the framework and in the app.
Double-check that the
On Jun 22, 2006, at 4:28 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Obviously, I have included the PostgresqlPlugin framework, both
in the framework and in the app.
Double-check that the PostgresqlPlugin framework is in the
Application Server target in the app project.
Aloha,
Art
_
Hi!
On 2006/06/22, at 17:35, Chuck Hill wrote:
Not related to your problem, but it is a best practice to set the
connection dictionary in code when having models in reusable
frameworks. Here is one way to do this (straight from Google):
http://wocode.com/cgi-bin/WebObjects/WOCode.woa/1/wa/Sh
Hi Miguel,
On Jun 22, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
I created a framework that contains a model file. I built and
installed it, and now I'm creating an app that should use it.
The model file has de adaptar stuff well defined, because I can
generate SQL and run it to create th
Hi!
I created a framework that contains a model file. I built and
installed it, and now I'm creating an app that should use it.
The model file has de adaptar stuff well defined, because I can
generate SQL and run it to create the tables.
The problem is that, when I try to use it in
