> On Dec 2, 2014, at 12:02 PM, OC wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
> thanks a lot, but don't please let my problems spoil your vacation :)
>
>> On 2. 12. 2014, at 4:11, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>
>> The list of objects to get certain operation (e.g. Insert, delete,etc) is
>> stored separately from the EOs. I
Chuck,
thanks a lot, but don't please let my problems spoil your vacation :)
On 2. 12. 2014, at 4:11, Chuck Hill wrote:
> The list of objects to get certain operation (e.g. Insert, delete,etc) is
> stored separately from the EOs. I have seen cases of Insert getting replaced
> with Update. I
The list of objects to get certain operation (e.g. Insert, delete,etc) is
stored separately from the EOs. I have seen cases of Insert getting replaced
with Update. I think this was due to the EC not being properly locked, but an
exception may have been involved too. It sounds like in your case