can fetch on each slave and then mash them together in an array, but
> the objects in the array will not all share the same EC. Personally,
> I’d run away.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Paul Hoadley
> *Date: *Friday, December 15, 2017 at 2:5
: Chuck Hill
Cc: André Rothe , WebObjects-Dev
Subject: Re: Using database objects in different schemas
Hi Chuck,
On 16 Dec 2017, at 6:17 am, Chuck Hill
mailto:ch...@gevityinc.com>> wrote:
I think you can make it work, but it is going to need a database connection for
each slave. And
Hi Chuck,
On 16 Dec 2017, at 6:17 am, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I think you can make it work, but it is going to need a database connection
> for each slave. And there can’t be relationships between slaves or between
> the master and the slave. And it is going to be susceptible to “bad
> assumpti
EOAdaptorChannel.Delegate.adaptorChannelShouldEvaluateExpression
boolean adaptorChannelShouldEvaluateExpression(EOAdaptorChannel channel,
EOSQLExpression expression)
Invoked from evaluateExpression to tell the delegate that the adaptor channel
object is sending expression to the database server.
objects in different schemas
Hi André,
On 15 Dec 2017, at 6:33 pm, André Rothe
mailto:andre.ro...@phosco.info>> wrote:
But how does EOF differ the objects? They come from different tables (but with
the same name, only the owners differ). The owner I would intercept and change
in the SQL cod
Hi Paul,
Hm, then I will come back to my first idea, building EOModels
dynamically with
databaseContext.availableChannel().adaptorChannel().describeModelWithTableNames(namelist)
I hope, I can set full-qualified tablenames there. It is a very common
method in my business domain to have a mas
Hi André,
On 15 Dec 2017, at 6:33 pm, André Rothe wrote:
> But how does EOF differ the objects? They come from different tables (but
> with the same name, only the owners differ). The owner I would intercept and
> change in the SQL code. Can EOF track this without a model? Also the primary
>
Hi Markus,
But how does EOF differ the objects? They come from different tables
(but with the same name, only the owners differ). The owner I would
intercept and change in the SQL code. Can EOF track this without a
model? Also the primary keys could overlap, because the "slaves" use its
own s
André,
I seem to remember that there are hooks in WebObjects that allow you to have a
last look at the generated SQL statement before it is executed. You can then
fine tune your statements by adding the qualifiying schema name to any table
name. No need to fiddle with the EOModel.
EOAdaptor de
Hello Jean,
The problem with the "slave" accounts is, that I don't have the
passwords for them. So I cannot create a connection to every account
except the "master" account.
Within the "master" there is a table, which holds the account names of
the "slaves". So it is possible to get the acco
Hmmm … reading your email a few times again, it seems that I didn’t understand
your problem at first and that my answer was off-topic.
I’m still not sure I really understand enough to be of any help, but let me try
again with (I hope) a better answer.
It seems that you would need a new jdbc conn
You might need to create a new jdbc connection for every user.
If I understand your situation correctly, I would try to use a unique EOF stack
for every session (user). In practice this can work well as long as you don’t
have too many sessions (exhausting DB connection).
You will have to change
12 matches
Mail list logo